We do as we construe: extended behavior construed as one task is executed as one cognitive entity

We select and execute extended task episodes (‘make tea’) as one entity and not individually execute their very many components (find kettle, boil water, etc.). Such hierarchical execution is thought to occur in familiar task situations with pre-existing task episode-related scripts that once selected, control the identity and sequence of component steps. Here, in contrast, we show hierarchical execution of extended behavior in situations, where the identity and sequence of component steps were unknown and a predetermined script could not have existed. Participants performed a rule-switching task in which the rule to be applied on each trial could not be predicted. Crucially, they were biased into construing a recurring instance of three or five trials as a single task episode. Behavioral signs of hierarchical execution, identical to those seen during memorized task-sequence executions, were present. These included longer reaction time on the first trial of each episode that was proportionate to the length of that episode, and absence of rule switch costs only between those consecutive trials that crossed episode boundaries. Hierarchical execution thus occurs every time the to-be-executed behavior is construed as one task episode, and is not limited to predictable sequences. We suggest that hierarchical execution occurs because task episodes are controlled and executed through goal-related entities assembled at the beginning of execution that subsume the execution and instantiate purposive control across time until the goal is complete.

[1]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: A reinforcement learning perspective , 2009, Cognition.

[3]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[4]  Amir Dezfouli,et al.  Habits as action sequences: hierarchical action control and changes in outcome value , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Tom Manly,et al.  Hierarchical Cognition Causes Task-Related Deactivations but Not Just in Default Mode Regions , 2018, eNeuro.

[6]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity in Goal Pursuit , 2005 .

[7]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[8]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Dissociating restart cost and mixing cost in task switching , 2009, Psychological research.

[9]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Sticky plans: Inhibition and binding during serial-task control , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Chunking away task-switch costs: a test of the chunk-point hypothesis , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[13]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  T. Egner Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Motor Programs: Concepts and Issues , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[17]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[18]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Selection for Cognition: Cognitive Constraints on Visual Spatial Attention Selection for Cognition: Cognitive Constraints on Visual Spatial Attention , 2022 .

[19]  S. Lehman The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal‐Directed Movements , 1990, Neurology.

[20]  K. Lewin,et al.  Vorsatz, Wille und Bedürfnis , 1926 .

[21]  Steven A. Jax,et al.  The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. , 2007, Human movement science.

[22]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Long-term memory and the control of attentional control , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  D Gopher,et al.  Switching tasks and attention policies. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. , 1989 .

[25]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[27]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[29]  L. Brooks,et al.  Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept Learning , 1984 .

[30]  Darren J Edwards,et al.  Task-relevant chunking in sequence learning. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[32]  M J Kahana,et al.  Interresponse times in serial recall: effects of intraserial repetition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  R. Passingham Attention to action. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Representation of Action Sequence Boundaries by Macaque Prefrontal Cortical Neurons , 2003, Science.

[35]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[37]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[38]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[39]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[40]  A. Allport,et al.  Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs” , 2000, Psychological research.

[41]  E. Koechlin,et al.  The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Science.

[42]  W. James The principles of psychology , 1983 .

[43]  John Duncan,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Cognition Reflected in Distributed Frontoparietal Activity , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Transient BOLD responses at block transitions , 2005, NeuroImage.

[45]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[47]  D. Plaut,et al.  Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. , 2004, Psychological review.

[48]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The cost of serially chaining two cognitive operations , 2012, Psychological research.

[49]  W. Neill Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. , 1997 .

[50]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[51]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[52]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[53]  E. Thorndike Ideo-motor action. , 1913 .

[54]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The cognitive architecture for chaining of two mental operations , 2009, Cognition.

[55]  R. Buckner,et al.  Transient Activation during Block Transition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[56]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Attention and Performance XIII , 2018 .

[57]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered , 1973 .

[59]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[60]  H. Spencer The Principles of Psychology - Vol. I , 2016 .

[61]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Simulating a Skilled Typist: A Study of Skilled Cognitive-Motor Performance , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  Theresa M. Desrochers,et al.  The Necessity of Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Higher-Level Sequential Behavior , 2015, Neuron.

[63]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[64]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[65]  A. Battersby Plans and the Structure of Behavior , 1968 .

[66]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Forgetting to Remember: The Functional Relationship of Decay and Interference , 2002, Psychological science.

[67]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[68]  T. Shallice,et al.  CONTENTION SCHEDULING AND THE CONTROL OF ROUTINE ACTIVITIES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.