Experimental and computational investigation of multi U-tube boreholes

In ground source heat pump (GSHP) applications, borehole drilling cost constitutes an important part of the investment cost and it can be reduced by improving borehole performance. In vertical GSHP applications, usually double-U tube configurations are used to improve the heat transfer rate per unit length of a borehole, (unit HTR value). To determine the optimal number of U-tubes which maximizes the commercial and engineering benefits of multi U-tube applications, cost and performance analyses of multi U-tube boreholes are crucial. In this study, a triple U-tube is used in a borehole of 50m depth. Time variation of unit HTR value of the borehole is experimentally measured when single, double and triple U-tubes are in operation separately. Furthermore a computational model is calibrated by fitting the computational results to the experimental ones, and effects of using four and five U-tubes in a borehole are computationally investigated. The relations between number of U tubes and time variation of unit HTR value of a borehole as well as investment cost are analyzed. Long term borehole performance predictions are made and compared for multi U-tube applications. Both experimental and computational results showed that performance improvements are remarkable for 2U-tube and 3U-tube configurations while it is nearly insignificant for 4U and 5U ones. If the investment cost per thermal power is considered, 2U-tube configuration is the optimal one if the prices of polyethylene pipes are relatively high, like in Turkey. When the cost of pipes decreases, then 3U-tube or even 4U–tube configuration can be the cheapest solution.

[1]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  Vertical-borehole ground-coupled heat pumps: A review of models and systems , 2010 .

[2]  Hyunku Park,et al.  Evaluation of thermal response and performance of PHC energy pile: Field experiments and numerical simulation , 2013 .

[3]  Francesco Tinti,et al.  An innovative Borehole Heat Exchanger configuration with improved heat transfer , 2013 .

[4]  Jalaluddin,et al.  Thermal performance investigation of several types of vertical ground heat exchangers with different operation mode , 2012 .

[5]  Michele De Carli,et al.  Thermal performance of two types of energy foundation pile: Helical pipe and triple U-tube , 2013 .

[6]  Chengying Qi,et al.  Improved method and case study of thermal response test for borehole heat exchangers of ground source heat pump system , 2010 .

[7]  Shin-Hyung Kang,et al.  Heating performance verification of a ground source heat pump system with U-tube and double tube type GLHEs , 2013 .

[8]  Daniel Castro-Fresno,et al.  Borehole thermal response and thermal resistance of four different grouting materials measured with a TRT , 2013 .

[9]  Marita L. Allan,et al.  Materials characterization of superplasticized cement–sand grout , 2000 .

[10]  Z. Fang,et al.  Heat transfer analysis of boreholes in vertical ground heat exchangers , 2003 .

[11]  Steve P. Kavanaugh,et al.  Thermal Conductivity of Cementitious Grouts and Impact On Heat Exchanger Length Design for Ground Source Heat Pumps , 1999 .

[12]  B. Palm,et al.  Distributed thermal response tests on pipe-in-pipe borehole heat exchangers , 2013 .

[13]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Comparative performance of ‘U-tube’ and ‘coaxial’ loop designs for use with a ground source heat pump. , 2012 .

[14]  Michele De Carli,et al.  Analysis of short helical and double U-tube borehole heat exchangers: A simulation-based comparison , 2013 .

[15]  Jin Luo,et al.  Thermal performance and economic evaluation of double U-tube borehole heat exchanger with three different borehole diameters , 2013 .

[16]  Paul Christodoulides,et al.  Single and double U-tube ground heat exchangers in multiple-layer substrates , 2013 .

[17]  Ahmet Koyun,et al.  Experimental study of heat transfer of buried finned pipe for ground source heat pump applications , 2009 .

[18]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1952 .

[19]  Daniel Pahud,et al.  Numerical evaluation of thermal response tests , 2007 .

[20]  Enzo Zanchini,et al.  Improving the thermal performance of coaxial borehole heat exchangers , 2010 .

[21]  S. Kakac,et al.  Heat conduction: Second edition , 1985 .

[22]  José Acuña,et al.  Borehole resistance and vertical temperature profiles in coaxial borehole heat exchangers , 2013 .

[23]  Konstantinos Papakostas,et al.  On the evaluation of design parameters effects on the heat transfer efficiency of energy piles , 2011 .

[24]  David Banks,et al.  An Introduction to Thermogeology: Ground Source Heating and Cooling , 2008 .

[25]  Gianpiero Colangelo,et al.  CFD simulations of horizontal ground heat exchangers: A comparison among different configurations , 2012 .

[26]  H. Brandl.  Energy foundations and other thermo-active ground structures , 2006 .

[27]  Bertrand François,et al.  Efficiency of various grouting materials for borehole heat exchangers , 2014 .