Process Capability Indices Based on the Highest Density Interval

For process capability indices (PCIs) of non-normal processes, the natural tolerance is defined as the difference between the 99.865 percentile and the 0.135 percentile of the process characteristic. However, some regions with relatively low probability density may still be included in this natural tolerance, while some regions with relatively high probability density may be excluded for asymmetric distributions. To take into account the asymmetry of process distributions and the asymmetry of tolerances from the viewpoint of probability density, the highest density interval is utilized to define the natural tolerance, and a family of new PCIs based on the highest density interval is proposed to ensure that regions with high probability density are included in the natural tolerance. Some properties of the proposed PCIs and two algorithms to compute the highest density interval are given. A real example is given to show the application of the proposed method. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Control Limits Based on the Narrowest Confidence Interval , 2011 .

[2]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Process Capability Indices—A Review, 1992–2000 , 2002 .

[3]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Process capability indices for a regularly adjusted process , 2002 .

[4]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  APPLICATION OF CLEMENTS' METHOD FOR CALCULATING SECOND- AND THIRD-GENERATION PROCESS CAPABILITY INDICES FOR NON-NORMAL PEARSONIAN POPULATIONS , 1994 .

[5]  Victor E. Kane,et al.  Process Capability Indices , 1986 .

[6]  R. L. Shinde,et al.  Probability-Based Process Capability Indices , 2009, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[7]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  A generalization of Clements’ method for non‐normal Pearsonian processes with asymmetric tolerances , 1999 .

[8]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Capability assessment for processes with multiple characteristics: A generalization of the popular index Cpk , 2011, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[9]  Mahdi Bashiri,et al.  A New Multivariate Process Capability Index Under Both Unilateral and Bilateral Quality Characteristics , 2012, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[10]  Yu Zhao,et al.  Multivariate control chart based on the highest possibility region , 2013 .

[11]  Ingrid Tano,et al.  Comparing Confidence Intervals for Multivariate Process Capability Indices , 2012, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[12]  W. L. Pearn,et al.  New generalization of process capability index Cpk , 1998 .

[13]  Hamid Shahriari,et al.  A process capability index for simple linear profile , 2013 .

[14]  Matthew P. Wand,et al.  Kernel Smoothing , 1995 .

[15]  Babak Abbasi,et al.  A transformation technique to estimate the process capability index for non-normal processes , 2008 .

[16]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  Capability measure for asymmetric tolerance non-normal processes applied to speaker driver manufacturing , 2005 .

[17]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  A Note on “Capability Assessment for Processes with Multiple Characteristics: A Generalization of the Popular Index Cpk” , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Babak Abbasi,et al.  Three New Multivariate Process Capability Indices , 2012 .

[19]  W. Pearn,et al.  Estimating process capability indices for non‐normal pearsonian populations , 1995 .

[20]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Distributional and Inferential Properties of Process Capability Indices , 1992 .

[21]  Jyh-Jen Horng Shiau,et al.  Yield‐Related Process Capability Indices for Processes of Multiple Quality Characteristics , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[22]  Daniel Grau,et al.  New Capability Indices for Non Normal Processes , 2010 .

[23]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Computing and Graphing Highest Density Regions , 1996 .