Challenges, uncertainties and issues facing gas production from gas hydrate deposits

Challenges, Uncertainties and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas Hydrate Deposits G.J. Moridis, SPE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; T.S. Collett, SPE, US Geological Survey; M. Pooladi- Darvish, SPE, University of Calgary and Fekete; S. Hancock, SPE, RPS Group; C. Santamarina, Georgia Institute of Technology; R. Boswell, US Department of Energy; T. Kneafsey, J. Rutqvist and M. B. Kowalsky, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; M.T. Reagan, SPE, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; E.D. Sloan, SPE, Colorado School of Mines; A.K. Sum and C. A. Koh, Colorado School of Mines Abstract The current paper complements the Moridis et al. (2009) review of the status of the effort toward commercial gas production from hydrates. We aim to describe the concept of the gas hydrate petroleum system, to discuss advances, requirement and suggested practices in gas hydrate (GH) prospecting and GH deposit characterization, and to review the associated technical, economic and environmental challenges and uncertainties, including: the accurate assessment of producible fractions of the GH resource, the development of methodologies for identifying suitable production targets, the sampling of hydrate-bearing sediments and sample analysis, the analysis and interpretation of geophysical surveys of GH reservoirs, well testing methods and interpretation of the results, geomechanical and reservoir/well stability concerns, well design, operation and installation, field operations and extending production beyond sand-dominated GH reservoirs, monitoring production and geomechanical stability, laboratory investigations, fundamental knowledge of hydrate behavior, the economics of commercial gas production from hydrates, and the associated environmental concerns. Introduction Background. Gas hydrates (GH) are solid crystalline compounds of water and gaseous substances described by the general chemical formula G•N H H 2 O, in which the molecules of gas G (referred to as guests) occupy voids within the lattices of ice- like crystal structures. Gas hydrate deposits occur in two distinctly different geographic settings where the necessary conditions of low temperature T and high pressure P exist for their formation and stability: in the Arctic (typically in association with permafrost) and in deep ocean sediments (Kvenvolden, 1988). The majority of naturally occurring hydrocarbon gas hydrates contain CH 4 in overwhelming abundance. Simple CH 4 - hydrates concentrate methane volumetrically by a factor of ~164 when compared to standard P and T conditions (STP). Natural CH 4 -hydrates crystallize mostly in the structure I form, which has a hydration number N H ranging from 5.77 to 7.4, with N H = 6 being the average hydration number and N H = 5.75 corresponding to complete hydration (Sloan and Koh, 2008). Natural GH can also contain other hydrocarbons (alkanes C  H 2+2 ,  = 2 to 4), but may also contain trace amounts of other gases (mainly CO 2 , H 2 S or N 2 ). Although there has been no systematic effort to map and evaluate this resource on a global scale, and current estimates of in-place volumes vary widely (ranging between 10 15 to 10 18 m 3 at standard conditions), the consensus is that the worldwide quantity of hydrocarbon within GH is vast (Milkov, 2004; Boswell and Collett, 2010). Given the sheer magnitude of the resource, ever increasing global energy demand, and the finite volume of conventional fossil fuel resources, GH are emerging as a potential energy source for a growing number of nations. The attractiveness of GH is further enhanced by the environmental desirability of natural gas, as it has the lowest carbon intensity of all fossil fuels. Thus, the appeal of GH accumulations as future hydrocarbon gas sources is rapidly increasing and their production potential clearly demands technical and economic evaluation. The past decade has seen a marked acceleration in gas hydrate R&D, including both a proliferation of basic scientific endeavors as well as the strong emergence of focused field studies of GH occurrence and resource potential, primarily within national GH programs (Paul et al., 2010). Together, these efforts have helped to clarify the dominant issues and challenges facing the extraction of methane from gas hydrates. A review paper by Moridis et al. (2009) summarized the status of the effort for production from gas hydrates. The authors discussed the distribution of natural gas hydrate accumulations, the status of the primary international research and development R&D programs (including current policies, focus and priorities), and the remaining science and technological challenges facing commercialization of production. After a brief examination of GH accumulations that are well characterized and appear to be models for future development and gas production, they analyzed the role of numerical simulation in the assessment of the hydrate production potential, identified the data needs for reliable predictions, evaluated the status of knowledge with regard to these needs, discussed knowledge gaps and their impact, and reached the conclusion that the numerical simulation capabilities are quite advanced and that the related gaps are either not significant or are being addressed. Furthermore, Moridis et al. (2009) reviewed the current body of literature relevant to potential productivity from different types of GH deposits, and determined that there are consistent indications of a large production potential at high rates over long periods from a wide variety of GH deposits. Finally, they identified (a) features, conditions, geology and techniques that are desirable in the selection of potential production targets, (b) methods to maximize production, and (c) some of the conditions and characteristics that render certain GH deposits undesirable for production.