Domain Specificity of Oculomotor Learning after Changes in Sensory Processing

Humans visually process the world with varying spatial resolution and can program their eye movements optimally to maximize information acquisition for a variety of everyday tasks. Diseases such as macular degeneration can change visual sensory processing, introducing central vision loss (a scotoma). However, humans can learn to direct a new preferred retinal location to regions of interest for simple visual tasks. Whether such learned compensatory saccades are optimal and generalize to more complex tasks, which require integrating information across a large area of the visual field, is not well understood. Here, we explore the possible effects of central vision loss on the optimal saccades during a face identification task, using a gaze-contingent simulated scotoma. We show that a new foveated ideal observer with a central scotoma correctly predicts that the human optimal point of fixation to identify faces shifts from just below the eyes to one that is at the tip of the nose and another at the top of the forehead. However, even after 5000 trials, humans of both sexes surprisingly do not change their initial fixations to adapt to the new optimal fixation points to faces. In contrast, saccades do change for tasks such as object following and to a lesser extent during search. Our findings argue against a central brain motor-compensatory mechanism that generalizes across tasks. They instead suggest task specificity in the learning of oculomotor plans in response to changes in front-end sensory processing and the possibility of separate domain-specific representations of learned oculomotor plans in the brain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The mechanism by which humans adapt eye movements in response to central vision loss is still not well understood and carries importance for gaining a fundamental understanding of brain plasticity. We show that although humans adapt their eye movements for simpler tasks such as object following and search, these adaptations do not generalize to more complex tasks such as face identification. We provide the first computational model to predict where humans with central vision loss should direct their eye movements in face identification tasks, which could become a critical tool in making patient-specific recommendations. Based on these results, we suggest a novel theory for oculomotor learning: a distributed representation of learned eye-movement plans represented in domain-specific areas of the brain.

[1]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[2]  David Williams,et al.  Improved likelihood ratio tests for complete contingency tables , 1976 .

[3]  H. Barlow The absolute efficiency of perceptual decisions. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[5]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  A. Burgess Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  R A Schuchard,et al.  Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[10]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. , 1997, Psychological review.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .

[13]  P. Schyns,et al.  Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[14]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[15]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  M. Crossland,et al.  Evaluation of a new quantitative technique to assess the number and extent of preferred retinal loci in macular disease , 2004, Vision Research.

[18]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Michael D Crossland,et al.  Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[20]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Transmitting and Decoding Facial Expressions , 2005, Psychological science.

[21]  D. Pelli,et al.  Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.

[23]  Yuki Kaku,et al.  Learning Signals from the Superior Colliculus for Adaptation of Saccadic Eye Movements in the Monkey , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search , 2009, Vision Research.

[25]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  T. Andrews,et al.  Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Active search for multiple targets is inefficient , 2010, Vision Research.

[28]  Elias B. Issa,et al.  Precedence of the Eye Region in Neural Processing of Faces , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  First fixations during face identification are invariant to rotation and scale , 2013 .

[30]  W. Seiple,et al.  Abnormal Fixation in Individuals With Age-Related Macular Degeneration When Viewing an Image of a Face , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Individual Differences in Eye Movements During Face Identification Reflect Observer-Specific Optimal Points of Fixation , 2013, Psychological science.

[32]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Choice of saccade endpoint under risk. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[33]  Maciej Pajak,et al.  Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[34]  Bosco S. Tjan,et al.  Rapid and Persistent Adaptability of Human Oculomotor Control in Response to Simulated Central Vision Loss , 2013, Current Biology.

[35]  Lei Liu,et al.  Adaptation to a simulated central scotoma during visual search training , 2014, Vision Research.

[36]  Ipek Oruc,et al.  Size determines whether specialized expert processes are engaged for recognition of faces. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[37]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces , 2014, Vision Research.

[38]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[39]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[40]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Visual search under scotopic lighting conditions , 2015, Vision Research.

[41]  T. Meese,et al.  Area summation of first- and second-order modulations of luminance. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[42]  Andrei Gorea,et al.  Time dilates more with apparent than with physical speed. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[43]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Stop before you saccade: Looking into an artificial peripheral scotoma. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[44]  Sheng Zhang,et al.  Optimal and human eye movements to clustered low value cues to increase decision rewards during search , 2015, Vision Research.

[45]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Perception and Processing of Faces in the Human Brain Is Tuned to Typical Feature Locations , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.