Domain Specificity of Oculomotor Learning after Changes in Sensory Processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .
[2] David Williams,et al. Improved likelihood ratio tests for complete contingency tables , 1976 .
[3] H. Barlow. The absolute efficiency of perceptual decisions. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[4] R. F. Wagner,et al. Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.
[5] A. Hendrickson,et al. Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[6] A. Burgess. Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[7] Wendy L. Braje,et al. Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.
[8] R A Schuchard,et al. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[9] Y. Benjamini,et al. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .
[10] G. Legge,et al. Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. , 1997, Psychological review.
[11] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[12] Craig K. Abbey,et al. A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .
[13] P. Schyns,et al. Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.
[14] G. Legge,et al. Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.
[15] H.H. Barrett,et al. Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[16] Miguel P. Eckstein,et al. Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[17] M. Crossland,et al. Evaluation of a new quantitative technique to assess the number and extent of preferred retinal loci in macular disease , 2004, Vision Research.
[18] Wilson S. Geisler,et al. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.
[19] Michael D Crossland,et al. Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. , 2005, Ophthalmology.
[20] Garrison W. Cottrell,et al. Transmitting and Decoding Facial Expressions , 2005, Psychological science.
[21] D. Pelli,et al. Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.
[22] G. Cottrell,et al. Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.
[23] Yuki Kaku,et al. Learning Signals from the Superior Colliculus for Adaptation of Saccadic Eye Movements in the Monkey , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[24] Wilson S. Geisler,et al. Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search , 2009, Vision Research.
[25] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[26] T. Andrews,et al. Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.
[27] Preeti Verghese,et al. Active search for multiple targets is inefficient , 2010, Vision Research.
[28] Elias B. Issa,et al. Precedence of the Eye Region in Neural Processing of Faces , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[29] Miguel P. Eckstein,et al. First fixations during face identification are invariant to rotation and scale , 2013 .
[30] W. Seiple,et al. Abnormal Fixation in Individuals With Age-Related Macular Degeneration When Viewing an Image of a Face , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[31] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Individual Differences in Eye Movements During Face Identification Reflect Observer-Specific Optimal Points of Fixation , 2013, Psychological science.
[32] Michael S Landy,et al. Choice of saccade endpoint under risk. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[33] Maciej Pajak,et al. Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[34] Bosco S. Tjan,et al. Rapid and Persistent Adaptability of Human Oculomotor Control in Response to Simulated Central Vision Loss , 2013, Current Biology.
[35] Lei Liu,et al. Adaptation to a simulated central scotoma during visual search training , 2014, Vision Research.
[36] Ipek Oruc,et al. Size determines whether specialized expert processes are engaged for recognition of faces. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[37] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces , 2014, Vision Research.
[38] Galit Yovel,et al. Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[39] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[40] Wilson S. Geisler,et al. Visual search under scotopic lighting conditions , 2015, Vision Research.
[41] T. Meese,et al. Area summation of first- and second-order modulations of luminance. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[42] Andrei Gorea,et al. Time dilates more with apparent than with physical speed. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[43] Preeti Verghese,et al. Stop before you saccade: Looking into an artificial peripheral scotoma. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[44] Sheng Zhang,et al. Optimal and human eye movements to clustered low value cues to increase decision rewards during search , 2015, Vision Research.
[45] Geraint Rees,et al. Perception and Processing of Faces in the Human Brain Is Tuned to Typical Feature Locations , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.