Recent advances in buccal drug delivery and absorption--in vitro and in vivo studies.

In the first part of this study, the aim was to characterize transport of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled dextrans of different molecular weights as model compounds for peptides and proteins through buccal mucosa. The penetration of these dextrans through porcine buccal mucosa (a nonkeratinized epithelium, comparable to human buccal mucosa) was investigated by measuring transbuccal fluxes and by analyzing the distribution of the fluorescent probe in the epithelium, using confocal laser scanning microscopy for visualizing permeation pathways. The results revealed that passage of hydrophilic compounds such as the FITC-dextrans through porcine buccal epithelium is restricted to permeants with a molecular weight lower than 20 kDa. The permeabilities of buccal mucosa for the 4 and 10 kDa FITC-dextran (of the order of 10(-8) cm/s) were not significantly different from each other or from the much smaller compound FITC. The confocal images of the distribution pattern of FITC-dextrans showed that the paracellular route is the major pathway through buccal epithelium. In the in vivo part of this study, buccal delivery of FITC-labelled dextran 4400 (FD4) and the peptide drug buserelin was investigated in vivo, in pigs. The delivery device consisted of an application chamber with a solution of FD4 or buserelin, and was attached to the buccal mucosa for 4 h using an adhesive patch. A randomized cross-over study including intravenous administration and buccal delivery without and with 10 mM sodium glycodeoxycholate (GDC) as an absorption enhancer was performed in pigs. After buccal administration, steady-state plasma levels were rapidly achieved. Co-administration of 10 mM GDC increased the absolute bioavailability from 1.8+/-0.5 to 12.7+/-2.0% for FD4. From the present studies, it is concluded that buccal administration is a suitable route for the delivery for macromolecules and hydrophilic compounds such as peptide drugs.

[1]  J. Pitha,et al.  Hydrophilic cyclodextrin derivatives enable effective oral administration of steroidal hormones. , 1986, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  T. Nagai,et al.  Buccal/gingival drug delivery systems , 1987 .

[3]  T. Nagai Adhesive topical drug delivery system , 1985 .

[4]  H. Merkle,et al.  (D) Routes of delivery: Case studies , 1992 .

[5]  B. Aungst,et al.  Comparison of the effects of various transmucosal absorption promoters on buccal insulin delivery , 1989 .

[6]  J. Cassidy,et al.  Controlled buccal delivery of buprenorphine , 1993 .

[7]  U. Kompella,et al.  Mucosal penetration enhancers for facilitation of peptide and protein drug absorption. , 1991, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[8]  H. Junginger,et al.  Buccal delivery of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4400 and the peptide drug buserelin with glycodeoxycholate as an absorption enhancer in pigs , 1996 .

[9]  S. W. Kim,et al.  Mucosal delivery of macromolecules , 1994 .

[10]  C. Howes,et al.  The effect of enhancers on the buccal absorption of hybrid (BDBB) α-interferon , 1994 .

[11]  H. Junginger,et al.  In-vivo buccal delivery of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4400 with glycodeoxycholate as an absorption enhancer in pigs. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[12]  Y. Nakada,et al.  The effect of additives on the oral mucosal absorption of human calcitonin in rats. , 1988, Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics.

[13]  H. Merkle,et al.  Buccal delivery for peptide drugs , 1992 .

[14]  C A Squier,et al.  The permeability of oral mucosa. , 1991, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[15]  W. Pw,et al.  Cellular and molecular basis of barrier function in oral epithelium. , 1991 .

[16]  Y. Nakada,et al.  The effect of bile salts on the oral mucosal absorption of human calcitonin in rats. , 1989, Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics.

[17]  J. Robinson,et al.  Mechanisms of penetration enhancement for transbuccal delivery of salicylic acid , 1992 .

[18]  C. Squier,et al.  The Structure and Function of Oral Mucosa , 1984 .

[19]  T. Stanley,et al.  An in vivo dog model for studying recovery kinetics of the buccal mucosa permeation barrier after exposure to permeation enhancers: apparent evidence of effective enhancement without tissue damage , 1994 .

[20]  H. Merkle,et al.  Comparative study of intravenous, nasal, oral and buccal TRH administration among healthy subjects , 1985, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[21]  J. Hadgraft,et al.  Absorption of drugs from the human oral cavity , 1991 .

[22]  D. Williams,et al.  The Permeability of Human Oral Mucosa and Skin to Water , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[23]  T. Nagai,et al.  New mucosal dosage form of insulin. , 1981, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[24]  J. Swarbrick Drugs and the pharmaceutical sciences , 1975 .

[25]  T. Nagai,et al.  Mucosal dosage form of lidocaine for toothache using hydroxypropyl cellulose and carbopol. , 1982, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[26]  H E Junginger,et al.  Developments in buccal drug delivery. , 1991, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.