Diverse virtual social networks: implications for remote software testing teams

This paper evaluates offshore outsourcing in the IT testing industry and determines what conditions determine its success. There is particular focus on the influence of diversity in teams on group relationships. Two studies are described: the first, investigated the perceptions of professional software testers on the critical factors of offshore outsourcing; and the second study looked at the ability for diverse teams to form close working relationships through virtual networks. We find that overt diversity factors inhibit interaction across nationality boundaries. The limitations of virtual networks for fostering personal communications is apparent in preventing group members from overcoming the initial aversion to mix with out-group members, which could be achieved with closer and more personal communications between members with different diversity factors in normal face to face communications. Where software testing teams are outsourced globaly, and must rely on virtual communications, there seems potential for significant difficulties in developing close working relationships, which on the one hand, can be negative for group cohesion, but one the other hand, can be positive for encouraging imparitality.

[1]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing , 2004, CACM.

[2]  P. Paulus,et al.  The Impact of Group Composition and Attitudes Towards Diversity on Anticipated Outcomes of Diversity in Groups , 2009 .

[3]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[4]  Madhuchhanda Das Aundhe,et al.  Risks in offshore IT outsourcing: A service provider perspective , 2009 .

[5]  Kraiwinee Bunyaratavej,et al.  Services cultural alignment in offshoring: The impact of cultural dimensions on offshoring location choices , 2010 .

[6]  Robbie T. Nakatsu,et al.  A comparative study of important risk factors involved in offshore and domestic outsourcing of software development projects: A two-panel Delphi study , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[7]  George B. Cunningham,et al.  Group Diversity, Occupational Commitment, and Occupational Turnover Intentions among NCAA Division IA Football Coaching Staffs , 2004 .

[8]  R. Dick,et al.  Recognizing the benefits of diversity: When and how does diversity increase group performance? , 2010 .

[9]  J. Brett,et al.  Managing multicultural teams. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[10]  Muhammad Ali Babar,et al.  Establishing and maintaining trust in software outsourcing relationships: An empirical investigation , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[11]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[12]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  Team structure and team performance in IS development: a social network perspective , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[13]  William E. Perry,et al.  Effective methods for software testing , 1995 .

[14]  Bogdan Korel,et al.  The chaining approach for software test data generation , 1996, TSEM.

[15]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[16]  G. Symon,et al.  The experience of outsourcing transfer: implications for guidance and counselling , 2006 .

[17]  Bo Yang,et al.  The integration mechanism of IT outsourcing partnership , 2005, ICEC '05.

[18]  George B. Cunningham.  Opening the Black Box: The Influence of Perceived Diversity and a Common In-Group Identity in Diverse Groups , 2007 .

[19]  Sachidanandam Sakthivel,et al.  Virtual workgroups in offshore systems development , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[20]  Long Wang,et al.  Empirical analysis of online social networks in the age of Web 2.0 , 2008 .

[21]  P. Earley,et al.  Cultural Intelligence , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

[22]  David Smith,et al.  Offshoring: Political Myths and Economic Reality , 2006 .

[23]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage , 2001 .

[24]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[25]  Stephen J. H. Yang,et al.  A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  Demographic Dissimilarity and Workplace Inclusion , 1999 .

[27]  Stephen Nicholas,et al.  The Role of Openness to Cognitive Diversity and Group Processes in Knowledge Creation , 2009 .

[28]  M. Guirdham.  Communicating with Diversity at Work , 1999 .

[29]  Stella Ting-Toomey.  Communicating Across Cultures , 1999 .

[30]  Pankaj Mudholkar,et al.  Software Testing , 2002, Computer.

[31]  Deepak Nayyar.  Globalisation, history and development: a tale of two centuries , 2006 .

[32]  Leisa D. Sargent,et al.  Does Diversity Affect Group Efficacy? , 2001 .

[33]  Pasi Pyöriä.  Virtual collaboration in knowledge work: from vision to reality , 2009 .

[34]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[35]  Glenford J. Myers,et al.  Art of Software Testing , 1979 .