Assessment of benefits and risks in development of targeted therapies for cancer — The view of regulatory authorities

Drug licensing and approval decisions involve the balancing of benefits against the risks (harms) in the presence of uncertainty. Typically, the benefits are estimated from primary efficacy endpoints from confirmatory (phase III) clinical trials although exceptions where promising early data from single‐arm studies have led to accelerated approvals are not uncommon, particularly for cancer drugs.

[1]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[2]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Is quantitative benefit-risk modelling of drugs desirable or possible? , 2011, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[3]  B. Jonsson,et al.  The European Medicines Agency: An Overview of Its Mission, Responsibilities, and Recent Initiatives in Cancer Drug Regulation , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  Daniel J. Freeman,et al.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  W. Gregory,et al.  Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. , 1990, BMJ.

[6]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  Pathological complete response and accelerated drug approval in early breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  G. Rasi,et al.  Cancer Drug Development and the Evolving Regulatory Framework for Companion Diagnostics in the European Union , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  E. Baudin,et al.  Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Role of randomized phase III trials in an era of effective targeted therapies , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[11]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Implementing personalized cancer care , 2014, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[12]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Armando Santoro,et al.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Abraham The international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use , 2009 .

[16]  P. Keegan,et al.  Accelerated approval of oncology products: the food and drug administration experience. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  L. Phillips,et al.  Balancing benefit and risk of medicines: a systematic review and classification of available methodologies , 2014, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[18]  F. Frueh,et al.  Evidence of Clinical Utility: An Unmet Need in Molecular Diagnostics for Patients with Cancer , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  Alasdair Breckenridge,et al.  Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Adachi,et al.  Patients preferences in chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Internal medicine.

[22]  P. Keegan,et al.  FDA drug approval summary: panitumumab (Vectibix). , 2007, The oncologist.

[23]  F. Johnson,et al.  Are Gastroenterologists Less Tolerant of Treatment Risks than Patients? Benefit-Risk Preferences in Crohn's Disease Management , 2010, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[24]  D. Berry,et al.  I‐SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[25]  P. Keegan,et al.  FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. , 2009, The oncologist.

[26]  B S Levitan,et al.  Application of the BRAT Framework to Case Studies: Observations and Insights , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[27]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[28]  H. Eichler,et al.  Adaptive Licensing: Taking the Next Step in the Evolution of Drug Approval , 2012, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[29]  J. Blay,et al.  VE-BASKET, a Simon 2-stage adaptive design, phase II, histology-independent study in nonmelanoma solid tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations (V600m): Activity of vemurafenib (VEM) with or without cetuximab (CTX) in colorectal cancer (CRC). , 2014 .

[30]  H. Eichler,et al.  Safe drugs and the cost of good intentions. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Why do patients choose chemotherapy near the end of life? A review of the perspective of those facing death from cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Strategies to overcome clinical, regulatory, and financial challenges in the implementation of personalized medicine. , 2013, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[33]  W. Wilson,et al.  Reevaluating the Accelerated Approval Process for Oncology Drugs , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  P. Murawa,et al.  Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  P. Keegan,et al.  Review of oncology and hematology drug product approvals at the US Food and Drug Administration between July 2005 and December 2007. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[36]  T. Mok,et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Anders Sundström,et al.  Factors Predisposing an Abstract To Be Accepted for Oral Presentation , 2008 .

[38]  C. Garnett,et al.  Vandetanib for the Treatment of Symptomatic or Progressive Medullary Thyroid Cancer in Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Disease: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval Summary , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[39]  R. Bremnes,et al.  Cancer patients, doctors and nurses vary in their willingness to undertake cancer chemotherapy. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[40]  P. Littlejohns NICE at 10 years: new challenges ahead , 2009, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.