A dual layer hair array of the brown lacewing: repelling water at different length scales.

Additional weight due to contamination (water and/or contaminating particles) can potentially have a detrimental effect on the flight capabilities of large winged insects such as butterflies and dragonflies. Insects where the wing surface area-body mass ratio is very high will be even more susceptible to these effects. Water droplets tend to move spontaneously off the wing surface of these insects. In the case of the brown lacewing, the drops effectively encounter a dual bed of hair springs with a topographical structure which aids in the hairs resisting penetration into water bodies. In this article, we demonstrate experimentally how this protective defense system employed by the brown lacewing (Micromus tasmaniae) aids in resisting contamination from water and how the micro- and nanostructures found on these hairs are responsible for quickly shedding water from the wing which demonstrates an active liquid-repelling surface.

[1]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[2]  J. Boreyko,et al.  Self-propelled dropwise condensate on superhydrophobic surfaces. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[3]  Jolanta A Watson,et al.  How micro/nanoarchitecture facilitates anti-wetting: an elegant hierarchical design on the termite wing. , 2010, ACS nano.

[4]  M. W. Holdgate,et al.  The Wetting of Insect Cuticles by Water , 1955 .

[5]  Christopher L. Brown,et al.  UV patterning of polyimide: differentiation and characterization of surface chemistry and structure , 2004 .

[6]  S N Gorb,et al.  Microsculpture of the wing surface in Odonata: evidence for cuticular wax covering. , 2000, Arthropod structure & development.

[7]  Stephan Herminghaus,et al.  How plants keep dry: a physicist's point of view. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[8]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[9]  T. J. McCarthy,et al.  How Wenzel and cassie were wrong. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  S. Gorb Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[11]  The escape strategy of green lacewings from orb webs , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[12]  Stephan Herminghaus,et al.  Roughness-induced non-wetting , 2000 .

[13]  P. Hansma,et al.  A nondestructive method for determining the spring constant of cantilevers for scanning force microscopy , 1993 .

[14]  J. Sambles,et al.  Photonic structures in biology , 2003, Nature.

[15]  Sverre Myhra,et al.  Putative functions and functional efficiency of ordered cuticular nanoarrays on insect wings. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Xuefeng Gao,et al.  Biophysics: Water-repellent legs of water striders , 2004, Nature.

[17]  Christopher L. Brown,et al.  Micro and nanostructures found on insect wings – designs for minimising adhesion and friction , 2010 .

[18]  Glen McHale,et al.  An introduction to superhydrophobicity. , 2010, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[19]  Sverre Myhra,et al.  Interactions of poly(amino acids) in aqueous solution with charged model surfaces - analysis by colloidal probe , 2004 .

[20]  G. Watson,et al.  Wetting properties on nanostructured surfaces of cicada wings , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  Bradley P. Dinte,et al.  Demonstration of atomic scale stick-slip events stimulated by the force versus distance mode using atomic force microscopy , 2002 .

[22]  Chunxiong Luo,et al.  Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[23]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .