Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants

Summary The accelerating loss of biodiversity worldwide demands effective tools for monitoring animal populations and informing conservation action. In habitats where direct observation is difficult (rain forests, oceans), or for cryptic species (shy, nocturnal), passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) provides cost-effective, unbiased data collection. PAM has broad applicability in terrestrial environments, particularly tropical rain forests. Using examples from studies of forest elephants in Central African rain forest, we show how PAM can be used to investigate cryptic behaviour, mechanisms of communication, estimate population size, quantify threats, and assess the efficacy of conservation strategies. We discuss the methodologies, requirements, and challenges of obtaining these data using acoustics. Where applicable, we compare these methods to more traditional approaches. While PAM methods and associated analysis are maturing rapidly, mechanisms are needed for processing the dense raw data efficiently with standard computer hardware, speeding development of detection algorithms, and harnessing communication networks to move data from the field to research facilities. Passive acoustic monitoring is a viable and cost-effective tool for conservation and should be incorporated in monitoring schemes much more broadly. The capability to quickly assess changes in behaviour, population size, and landscape use, simultaneously over large geographical areas, makes this approach attractive for detecting human-induced impacts and for assessing the success of conservation strategies.

[1]  T. Rogers,et al.  Density Can Be Misleading for Low-Density Species: Benefits of Passive Acoustic Monitoring , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Mya E. Thompson,et al.  Heard but not seen: an acoustic survey of the African forest elephant population at Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana , 2010 .

[3]  A. M. Rui,et al.  Habitat use and seasonal activity of insectivorous bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in the grasslands of southern Brazil , 2014 .

[4]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Acoustic monitoring of nocturnally migrating birds accurately assesses the timing and magnitude of migration through the Great Lakes , 2014 .

[5]  Eric R. Britzke,et al.  Evaluation of Mobile Acoustic Techniques for Bat Population Monitoring , 2014 .

[6]  Designing an effective mark-recapture study of Antarctic blue whales. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  A. Frankel,et al.  A New Context‐Based Approach to Assess Marine Mammal Behavioral Responses to Anthropogenic Sounds , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  Paul D. Teal,et al.  Temporal and environmental influences on the vocal behaviour of a nocturnal bird , 2014 .

[9]  Zhigang Jiang,et al.  Bioacoustic cues and their relations to dominance rank in Père David’s deer stags , 2016 .

[10]  S. Parijs,et al.  2. Biologically Important Areas for Cetaceans Within U.S. Waters – East Coast Region , 2015 .

[11]  C. Clark,et al.  Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: intuitions, analysis, and implication , 2009 .

[12]  S. Eltringham,et al.  The daily activity of the elephant in the Rwenzori National Park, Uganda , 1974 .

[13]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success , 2011 .

[14]  Peter H. Wrege,et al.  Opening a larger window onto forest elephant ecology , 2012 .

[15]  Phyllis C. Lee,et al.  Forest elephants: fission–fusion and social arenas , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Kurt M. Fristrup,et al.  No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas , 2009 .

[17]  Sean O'Donnell,et al.  Severe declines of understory birds follow illegal logging in Upper Guinea forests of Ghana, West Africa , 2015 .

[18]  Christopher W. Clark,et al.  Data Mining Sound Archives: A New Scalable Algorithm for Parallel-Distributing Processing , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW).

[19]  D. Woodruff,et al.  Estimating population sizes for elusive animals: the forest elephants of Kakum National Park, Ghana , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[20]  C. Kerbiriou,et al.  Use of Large‐Scale Acoustic Monitoring to Assess Anthropogenic Pressures on Orthoptera Communities , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Integrating passive acoustic and visual data to model spatial patterns of occurrence in coastal dolphins , 2015 .

[22]  P. Miller,et al.  Marine seismic surveys and ocean noise: time for coordinated and prudent planning , 2015 .

[23]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Continuous‐time spatially explicit capture–recapture models, with an application to a jaguar camera‐trap survey , 2014 .

[24]  Peter H Wrege,et al.  Use of Acoustic Tools to Reveal Otherwise Cryptic Responses of Forest Elephants to Oil Exploration , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[25]  L. L. Bailey,et al.  Efficient Species‐Level Monitoring at the Landscape Scale , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  Janelle L. Morano,et al.  North Atlantic right whale occurrence near wind energy areas along the mid-Atlantic US coast: implications for management , 2015 .

[27]  Hjalmar S. Kühl,et al.  Towards the automated detection and occupancy estimation of primates using passive acoustic monitoring , 2015 .

[28]  Samuel T. Turvey,et al.  Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition , 2008 .

[29]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Mark J. Whittingham,et al.  The Use of Automated Bioacoustic Recorders to Replace Human Wildlife Surveys: An Example Using Nightjars , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  T. Breuer,et al.  The consequences of poaching and anthropogenic change for forest elephants , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  M. Willig,et al.  Standardized Assessment of Biodiversity Trends in Tropical Forest Protected Areas: The End Is Not in Sight , 2016, PLoS biology.

[33]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  Acoustic estimation of wildlife abundance: methodology for vocal mammals in forested habitats , 2009 .

[34]  Kathryn T. A. Lambert,et al.  A low-cost, yet simple and highly repeatable system for acoustically surveying cryptic species , 2014 .

[35]  J. Szewczak,et al.  Bat Activity Across the Vertical Gradient of an Old-Growth Sequoia sempervirens Forest , 2014 .

[36]  M. Amorim,et al.  Painted gobies sing their quality out loud: acoustic rather than visual signals advertise male quality and contribute to mating success , 2013 .

[37]  David R. Wilson,et al.  Urban noise affects song structure and daily patterns of song production in Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) , 2014, Urban Ecosystems.

[38]  K. Fernie,et al.  Population trends and calling phenology of anuran populations surveyed in Ontario estimated using acoustic surveys , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[39]  H. Chen,et al.  Animal occurrence and space use change in the landscape of anthropogenic noise , 2015 .

[40]  The effects of poaching disturbance on elephant behaviour , 1990 .

[41]  Christopher W. Clark,et al.  An autonomous, near‐real‐time buoy system for automatic detection of North Atlantic right whale calls. , 2009 .

[42]  Hjalmar S. Kühl,et al.  Assessing the performance of a semi‐automated acoustic monitoring system for primates , 2015 .

[43]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera‐trap studies , 2009 .

[44]  G. Wittemyer,et al.  Assessing species occurrence and species-specific use patterns of bais (forest clearings) in Central Africa with camera traps , 2014 .

[45]  P. Tyack,et al.  Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.