Formation of soot and nitrogen oxides in unsteady counterflow diffusion flames

The formation of pollutant species in turbulent diffusion flames is strongly affected by turbulence/chemistry interactions. Unsteady counterflow diffusion flames can be conveniently used to address the unsteady effects of hydrodynamics on the pollutant chemistry, because they exhibit a larger range of combustion conditions than those observed in steady flames. In this paper, unsteady effects on the formation of soot (and its main precursors) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) are investigated by imposing harmonic oscillations on the strain rate of several counterflow diffusion flames fed with propane. Numerical results confirm that the dynamic response of each species is strongly affected by the strain rate oscillations and the characteristic time governing its chemistry. At low frequencies of imposed oscillations the soot and NOx profiles show strong deviations from the steady-state profile. At large frequencies a decoupling between the concentration and the velocity field is evident. In particular, the formation of soot and NOx is found less sensitive to velocity fluctuations for flames with large initial strain rate. The significant increase of soot and NOx concentrations in unsteady conditions appears to be a function of both forcing frequency and flame global strain rate. Moreover, the cut-off frequency, defined as the minimum frequency above which the strain rate oscillations have negligible effects on the formation of each species, was found to be strongly dependent on the chemical characteristic time and the flame global strain rate, but only marginally affected by the amplitude of imposed oscillations.

[1]  F. Williams,et al.  Theory of Structures of Hydrogen-Air Diffusion Flames , 1995 .

[2]  Guido Buzzi-Ferraris Scientific C++: Building Numerical Libraries the Object-Oriented Way , 1993 .

[3]  Richard C Aiken,et al.  Stiff computation , 1985 .

[4]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  A wide range kinetic modeling study of the pyrolysis and combustion of naphthenes , 2003 .

[5]  C. Sung,et al.  Structural sensitivity, response, and extinction of diffusion and premixed flames in oscillating counterflow , 2000 .

[6]  D. E. Rosner,et al.  Thermophoretic Effects on Particles in Counterflow Laminar Diffusion Flames , 1993 .

[7]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Response of counterflow diffusion flames to oscillating strain rates , 1995 .

[8]  N. Peters Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion , 1988 .

[9]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  An experimental and theoretical investigation of the dilution, pressure and flow-field effects on the extinction condition of methane-air-nitrogen diffusion flames , 1991 .

[10]  E. Ranzi,et al.  Experimental and kinetic modeling study of sooting atmospheric-pressure cyclohexane flame , 2009 .

[11]  C. Sung,et al.  Structural response of counterflow diffusion flames to strain rate variations , 1995 .

[12]  James A. Miller,et al.  The Chemkin Thermodynamic Data Base , 1990 .

[13]  Davide Manca,et al.  BzzOde: a new C++ class for the solution of stiff and non-stiff ordinary differential equation systems , 1998 .

[14]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Numerical problems in the solution of oxidation and combustion models , 2001 .

[15]  William L. Roberts,et al.  Simultaneous particle-imaging velocimetry and OH planar laser-induced fluorescence measurements in an unsteady counterflow propane/air diffusion flame , 2000 .

[16]  Fabian Mauß,et al.  A lagrangian simulation of flamelet extinction and re-ignition in turbulent jet diffusion flames , 1991 .

[17]  Michele E. Decroix,et al.  Study of Transient Effects on the Extinction Limits of an Unsteady Counterflow Diffusion Flame , 1999 .

[18]  M. Mehl,et al.  Autoignition and burning rates of fuel droplets under microgravity , 2005 .

[19]  R. Barlow,et al.  Scalar profiles and NO formation in laminar opposed-flow partially premixed methane/air flames , 2001 .

[20]  Fokion N. Egolfopoulos,et al.  Unsteady counterflowing strained diffusion flames: diffusion-limited frequency response , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  L. Shampine,et al.  Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations. , 1995 .

[22]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Wide-Range Kinetic Modeling Study of the Pyrolysis, Partial Oxidation, and Combustion of Heavy n-Alkanes , 2005 .

[23]  E. Ranzi,et al.  Soot formation in unsteady counterflow diffusion flames , 2009 .

[24]  C. Carter,et al.  The response of a propane-air counter-flow diffusion flame subjected to a transient flow field , 2003 .

[25]  T. Faravelli,et al.  Frequency Response of Counter Flow Diffusion Flames to Strain Rate Harmonic Oscillations , 2008 .

[26]  T. Poinsot,et al.  Theoretical and numerical combustion , 2001 .

[27]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  The importance of time-dependent flame structures in stretched laminar flamelet models for turbulent jet diffusion flames , 1989 .

[28]  J. Warnatz,et al.  Numerical investigation of time-dependent properties and extinction of strained methane and propane-air flamelets , 1991 .

[29]  Tiziano Faravelli,et al.  Lumping procedures in detailed kinetic modeling of gasification, pyrolysis, partial oxidation and combustion of hydrocarbon mixtures , 2001 .

[30]  Michele E. Decroix,et al.  Transient Flow Field Effects on Soot Volume Fraction in Diffusion Flames , 2000 .

[31]  James A. Miller,et al.  A Computational Model of the Structure and Extinction of Strained, Opposed Flow, Premixed Methane- , 1988 .

[32]  F. Williams,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Diffusion-Flame Extinction with Radiant Loss from the Flame Zone , 1982 .

[33]  R. Barlow,et al.  On transient flamelets and their relationship to turbulent methane-air jet flames , 1992 .

[34]  R. Fox Computational Models for Turbulent Reacting Flows , 2003 .