Automatische Volumenabgrenzung in der onkologischen PET – Bewertung eines entsprechenden Software-Werkzeugs und Vergleich mit manueller Abgrenzung anhand klinischer Datensätze

Aim: Evaluation of a dedicated software tool for automatic delineation of 3D regions of interest in oncological PET. Patients, methods: The applied procedure encompasses segmentation of user-specified subvolumes within the tomographic data set into separate 3D ROIs, automatic background determination, and local adaptive thresholding of the background corrected data. Background correction and adaptive thresholding are combined in an iterative algorithm. Nine experienced observers used this algorithm for automatic delineation of a total of 37 ROIs in 14 patients. Additionally, the observers delineated the same ROIs also manually (using a freely chosen threshold for each ROI) and the results of automatic and manual ROI delineation were compared. Results: For the investigated 37 ROIs the manual delineation shows a strong interobserver variability of (26.8±6.3)% (range: 15% to 45%) while the corresponding value for automatic delineation is (1.1±1.0)% (range: <0.1% to 3.6%). The fractional deviation of the automatic volumes from the observer-averaged manual ones is (3.7±12.7)%. Conclusion: The evaluated software provides results in very good agreement with observer-averaged manual evaluations, facilitates and accelerates the volumetric evaluation, eliminates the problem of interobserver variability and appears to be a useful tool for volumetric evaluation of oncological PET in clinical routine.

[1]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  P. Wust,et al.  Comparison of CT, MRI and FDG-PET in response prediction of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal preoperative therapy: Is there a benefit in using functional imaging? , 2005, European Radiology.

[3]  L. Broemeling,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Autocontouring Versus Manual Contouring , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Real-Time Volume Rendering Visualization of Dual-Modality PET/CT Images With Interactive Fuzzy Thresholding Segmentation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6]  D Visvikis,et al.  Fuzzy hidden Markov chains segmentation for volume determination and quantitation in PET. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Andreas Bockisch,et al.  Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Di Yan,et al.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  A. Riegel,et al.  Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Florent Tixier,et al.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  The current status of FDG-PET in tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2006, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  I. Poon,et al.  Automated radiation targeting in head-and-neck cancer using region-based texture analysis of PET and CT images. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  P Vera,et al.  Development of a generic thresholding algorithm for the delineation of 18FDG-PET-positive tissue: application to the comparison of three thresholding models , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Repeatability of Metabolically Active Volume Measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[18]  Wilson Roa,et al.  A local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[19]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Automated functional image-guided radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Anne Bol,et al.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  Daniel A Low,et al.  A novel PET tumor delineation method based on adaptive region-growing and dual-front active contours. , 2008, Medical physics.

[24]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  R. Kessler,et al.  Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  B. C. Penney,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model for definition of lung tumor volumes in positron emission tomography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[27]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET , 2007, Nuclear medicine communications.

[28]  C. Boy,et al.  3D volume and SUV analysis of oncological PET studies , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[29]  F Hofheinz,et al.  Effects of cold sphere walls in PET phantom measurements on the volume reproducing threshold , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.