Protocols for Collection of Surface Soil Samples at Military Training and Testing Ranges for the Characterization of Energetic Munitions Constituents

Abstract : In the past, very little guidance has been available for site characterization activities addressing the concentration and mass of energetic residues in military training range soils. Energetic residues are heterogeneously distributed over military training ranges as particles of various sizes, shapes, and compositions. Most energetic residues are deposited on the surface, and the highest concentrations exist at firing positions, near targets, and where demolition activities are performed. In the case of impact and demolition ranges the greatest quantities of residues are from rounds that fail to detonate as designed. To address the compositional and distributional heterogeneity associated with the distribution of particles and to obtain representative mean energetic residue soil concentrations, the sampling strategy must strive for the acquisition of samples that contain the constituents of concern in the same proportion to the bulk matrix as exists within the decision unit (sampled area, population, or exposure unit). This report summarizes the sampling strategies and designs that have been implemented for various types of military ranges, including hand grenade, antitank rocket, artillery, bombing, and demolition ranges. These protocols were developed during investigations on active ranges and primarily addressed potential surface source zones from which energetic residues could be migrating into surface and groundwater systems. A multi-increment sampling strategy was selected to accomplish this task after exposing the inadequacies of discrete sampling.

[1]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Residues from Live Fire Detonations of 155-mm Howitzer Rounds , 2005 .

[2]  Sonia Thiboutot,et al.  Identity and distribution of residues of energetic compounds at army live-fire training ranges. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[3]  Kevin L. Bjella Pre-Screening for Explosives Residues in Soil Prior to HPLC Analysis Utilizing Expray , 2005 .

[4]  Susan R. Bigl,et al.  Sampling Studies at an Air Force Live-Fire Bombing Range Impact Area , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Representative Sampling for Energetic Compounds at Military Training Ranges , 2005 .

[6]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice , 1989 .

[7]  Sonia Thiboutot,et al.  Environmental Conditions of Surface Soils and Biomass Prevailing in the Training Area at CFB Gagetown, New Brunswick , 2003 .

[8]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Sampling strategies near a low-order detonation and a target at an artillery impact area , 2004 .

[9]  Richard A. Karn,et al.  Distribution and Fate of Energetics on DoD Test and Training Ranges , 2004 .

[10]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Collection Methods and Laboratory Processing of Samples from Donnelly Training Area Firing Points, Alaska, 2003 , 2005 .

[11]  René Lefebvre,et al.  Evaluation of the Impacts of Live Fire Training at CFB Shilo , 2003 .

[12]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Estimating Energetic Residue Loading on Military Artillery Ranges: Large Decision Units , 2005 .

[13]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Representative sampling for energetic compounds at an antitank firing range , 2004 .

[14]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[15]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Characterization and Fate of gun and rocket propellant residues on testing and training ranges: Interim Report 2 , 2010 .

[16]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Distribution and Fate of Energetics on DoD Test and Training Ranges: Interim Report 5 , 2006 .

[17]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Energetic Residues From Live-Fire Detonations of 120-mm Mortar Rounds , 2005 .

[18]  P. Stolpman,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.

[19]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Coping with Spatial Heterogeneity Effects on Sampling and Analysis at an HMX-Contaminated Antitank Firing Range. , 1999 .

[20]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[21]  Marianne E. Walsh,et al.  Comment on “Data Representativeness for Risk Assessment” by Rosemary Mattuck et al., 2005 , 2005 .

[22]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Estimates for Explosives Residue from the Detonation of Army Munitions , 2003 .

[23]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Sampling error associated with collection and analysis of soil samples at TNT‐contaminated sites , 1997 .

[24]  Michael R. Walsh Field sampling tools for explosives residues developed at CRREL , 2004 .

[25]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Characterization of Explosives Contamination at Military Firing Ranges Characterization of Explosives Contamination at Military Firing Ranges Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program , 2022 .

[26]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Identity and distribution of residues of energetic compounds at military live-fire training ranges , 2005 .

[27]  Sonia Thiboutot,et al.  Characterization of Antitank Firing Ranges at CFB Valcartier, WATC Wainwright and CFAD Dundurn, , 1998 .

[28]  Susan Taylor,et al.  RDX and TNT residues from live-fire and blow-in-place detonations. , 2005, Chemosphere.