Influence of Three-Dimensional Scaffold on Bone Induction by KUSA/A1 Cells

Recently, atelocollagen has been used in tissue engineering as one of the most useful scaffolds for bone formation. However, the optimal scaffold-structure for bone engineering has not been determined. Hence, we compared the honeycomb porous structure (HPS) and the interconnected porous structure (IPS) with or without KUSA/A1 cells in vivo. KUSA/A1 cells alone, HPS alone, IPS alone, KUSA/A1-HPS and KUSA/A1-IPS were implanted in the subcutaneous pockets of 4-weeks-old male SCID mice. The implants were examined radiologically and histologically 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after implantation. Radiologically, small radiopaque islands of new bone were observed in the implant of KUSA/A1 cells alone. No radiopacity was observed with both scaffols alone. In the KUSA/A1-HPS implant, the scaffold was partially filled with radiopaque areas. In contrast, in the KUSA/A1-IPS implant, the whole scaffold was filled with a well-defined radiopaque area. Histologically, KUSA/A1 cells alone induced only small nests of new bone. HPS alone produced inflammatory reaction. A large bone was observed in implants of KUSA/A1 cells combined with both scaffolds, but the scaffold was completely filled with new bone without inflammatory reaction within a shorter period in the KUSA/A1-IPS compared to KUSA/A1-HPS implant. Our results indicated that a cotton structured scaffold plays an important role in carrying the cells, providing the precise size, shape and comfortable environment. These results have potential impact to enhance existing therapeutic strategies.

[1]  K. Segawa,et al.  Multipotent marrow stromal cell line is able to induce hematopoiesis in vivo , 1992, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  Q. Shang,et al.  Tissue-Engineered Bone Repair of Sheep Cranial Defects with Autologous Bone Marrow Stromal Cells , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[3]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Use of isolated mature osteoblasts in abundance acts as desired‐shaped bone regeneration in combination with a modified poly‐DL‐lactic‐co‐glycolic acid (PLGA)‐collagen sponge , 2003, Journal of cellular physiology.

[4]  Y Noishiki,et al.  A honeycomb collagen carrier for cell culture as a tissue engineering scaffold. , 2001, Artificial organs.

[5]  K. Nakano,et al.  Aging and Ectopic Bone Formation Induced by Partially Purified Bone Morphogenetic Protein : Blood Vessel Ingrowth and Localization of Type I Collagen and Osteocalcin Assessed by Immunohistochemistry , 1997 .

[6]  A. Friedenstein,et al.  Bone marrow osteogenic stem cells: in vitro cultivation and transplantation in diffusion chambers , 1987, Cell and tissue kinetics.

[7]  M. Murata,et al.  De Novo Bone Formation Using Bovine Collagen and Platelet-rich Plasma in Animals , 2004 .

[8]  J O Hollinger,et al.  The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. , 1990, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[9]  D. Sato,et al.  Bone augmentation by onlay implant using recombinant human BMP-2 and collagen on adult rat skull without periosteum. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  J. Kaiser Seeking the Cause of Induced Leukemias in X-SCID Trial , 2003, Science.

[11]  Y. Kuboki,et al.  Comparative histological studies of bone and cartilage formations induced by various BMP-carrier composites.:Comparative histological studies of bone and cartilage formations induced by various BMP-carrier composites , 1994 .

[12]  Joseph P Vacanti,et al.  Formation of a mandibular condyle in vitro by tissue engineering. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.