Detecting cryoablation with EIT and the benefit of including ice front imaging data.

Imaging has made cryosurgery, the destruction of unwanted tissue through freezing, valuable. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been explored as a method to determine the volume of tissue that is frozen during the procedure. However, studies have shown that tissue near the edge of the frozen zone often survives since in this region it may only be the extra-cellular space that is frozen. This threatens the usefulness of cryosurgery for cancer therapy since inaccurate ablation either allows the cancer to survive or increases the chances of complications. Since low-frequency conductivity of tissue increases due to cell membrane impairment, and ablated tissue implies impaired membranes, EIT has the capability to recover images of tissue viability. Cryosurgery is a technique that can benefit from this: EIT scans before freezing and after thawing can show changes in conductivity and hence viability due to treatment. Assuming unfrozen tissue will survive treatment, we explore the use of differential EIT in combination with intra-operative ice front imaging modes that are currently in clinical practice to recover enhanced-resolution images of cryosurgical treatment efficacy in a set of simulated experiments. We also investigate the sensitivity to violation of this assumption and predict tolerable levels of measurement noise.

[1]  A. Gage,et al.  Mechanisms of tissue injury in cryosurgery. , 1998, Cryobiology.

[2]  Keith Paulsen,et al.  Using multiple-electrode impedance measurements to monitor cryosurgery. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  T. Jang,et al.  Histopathology of human renal tumors after laparoscopic renal cryosurgery. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[4]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  A Matlab toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the Electrical Impedance and Diffuse Optical Reconstruction Software project , 2002 .

[5]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography of cell viability in tissue with application to cryosurgery. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  P. Mazur Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  Richard L. Sohn,et al.  Long-term follow up and prognostic factors for cryotherapy of malignant liver tumors. , 2004, Surgery.

[8]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Cryosurgical monitoring using bioimpedance measurements-a feasibility study for electrical impedance tomography , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  M S Roos,et al.  MRI-monitored cryosurgery in the rabbit brain. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  A. Goncharsky,et al.  Iterative algorithms for solving non-linear ill-posed problems with monotonic operators. Principle of iterative regularization , 1994 .

[11]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided hepatic cryosurgery in the treatment of metastatic colon carcinoma. Preliminary results , 1991, Cancer.

[12]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[13]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Temperature dependence of tissue impedivity in electrical impedance tomography of cryosurgery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  A. Belldegrun,et al.  Third‐generation cryosurgery for primary and recurrent prostate cancer , 2004, BJU international.

[15]  Moshe Rosenfeld,et al.  Induced current bio-impedance technique for monitoring cryosurgery procedure in a two-dimensional head model using generalized coordinate systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.