Social Rights Jurisprudence: Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

INTRODUCTION After the adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR’), which included a relatively full catalogue of human rights, the UN General Assembly instructed the Commission on Human Rights to commence the drafting of a single covenant on human rights. While the drafting of a treaty covering civil and political rights was completed in short time, disagreement over whether to include economic, social and cultural rights led the Economic and Social Council (‘ECOSOC’) to request guidance from the General Assembly. The General Assembly initially ordered the Commission to produce one covenant but later reversed its position due to mediocre drafting progress, further prompting from ECOSOC and opposition of some Western States to economic, social and cultural rights. In 1966, it approved the adoption of two Covenants: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (‘ICCPR’) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the ‘Covenant’ or ‘ICESCR’), the latter lacking a complaints mechanism. Two decades after this schism, the ‘renaissance’ of economic, social and cultural rights (‘ESC rights’) is partly attributable to the pioneering work of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (‘the Committee’). Established in 1987, the Committee has developed a ‘jurisprudence’ through its general comments and State-specific concluding observations. This work has been influential and catalytic in helping develop the conceptual framework of economic, social and cultural rights.

[1]  A. Mowbray.  The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights , 2004 .

[2]  Charles A. Reich,et al.  The New Property , 1964 .

[3]  Ashwani Saith,et al.  From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation , 2006 .

[4]  M. Craven.  The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on its Development , 1995 .

[5]  Salman M. A. Salman,et al.  The human right to water : legal and policy dimensions , 2004 .

[6]  T. Kiefer,et al.  Beyond State Sovereignty: The Human Right to Water , 2005 .

[7]  Michele E. Gilman,et al.  Legal Accountability in an Era of Privatized Welfare , 2001 .

[8]  Wouter Vandenhole,et al.  I Book Review: The Procedures before the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Divergence or Convergence?, Non-Discrimination and Equality in the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies , 2007 .

[9]  G. Quinn,et al.  The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights , 1987 .

[10]  J. Freeman.  Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law , 1999 .

[11]  D. P. Stewart,et al.  Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Should There Be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing, and Health? , 2004, American Journal of International Law.

[12]  M. Craven.  The Violence of Dispossession: Extra-Territoriality and Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights , 2007 .

[13]  S. Tully.  A Human Right to Access Water? A Critique of General Comment No. 15 , 2005 .

[14]  K. Müller.  Privatising Old-Age Security: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared , 2003 .

[15]  Philip Alston.  Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals , 2005 .

[16]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do , 2001 .

[17]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Human right to water , 1998 .

[18]  D. P. Stewart,et al.  International human rights in a nutshell , 1976 .

[19]  A. Cahill.  ‘The human right to water – a right of unique status’: The legal status and normative content of the right to water , 2005 .

[20]  W. Vandenhole.  Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the CRC: Is There a Legal Obligation to Cooperate Internationally for Development? , 2009 .

[21]  P. Alston.  Out of the Abyss: The Challenges Confronting the New U. N. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights , 1987 .

[22]  Jeff A. King.  Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian Chaoulli Health Care Decision , 2006 .

[23]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Basic Water Requirements for Human Activities: Meeting Basic Needs , 1996 .

[24]  Pierre M. Dupuy.  Reviewing the difficulties of codification: on Ago's classification of obligations of means and obligations of result in relation to state responsibility , 1999 .

[25]  J. Freeman,et al.  Extending Public Law Norms Through Privatization , 2003 .

[26]  Право Соціального Забезпечення,et al.  THE RIGHT TO SOCIAL SECURITY , 2001, The Revised European Social Charter.

[27]  M. Sepúlveda.  Obligations of ‘International Assistance and Cooperation’ in an Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights , 2006 .

[28]  D. J. Kennedy.  Due Process in a Privatized Welfare System , 1998 .

[29]  R. Robertson.  Measuring state compliance with the obligation to devote the 'maximum available resources' to realizing economic, social and cultural rights , 1994 .

[30]  A. Sen.  Work and rights , 2000 .

[31]  Mary Dowell-Jones.  I Book Review: Contextualising the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Assessing the Economic Deficit , 2004 .

[32]  D. Bilchitz.  Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights , 2007 .

[33]  Anne-Marie Guillemard.  Emploi, protection sociale et cycle de vie : résultats d'une comparaison internationale des dispositifs de sortie anticipée d'activité , 1993 .