Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?

Abstract This research study elicits students' perceptions of the extent to which a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) supports, or indeed enhances, their learning experiences. A phenomenographic research study was conducted among first year, undergraduate accounting students at a UK business school that adopts the commercially provided VLE, Blackboard. Although the aim of using the VLE as a supplementary tool is to add value to the broader teaching–learning environment, the findings revealed that students perceived tutors to be using the VLE simply as an ‘online textbook’, resulting, at best, in the use of the VLE as a ‘safety net’. The findings also suggested that taught sessions were perceived as adding little or no value to the VLE provision. By providing a clearer understanding of students' perceptions, this study enables tutors to review both their classroom and online provisions within Entwistle's (2003) conceptual framework to facilitate changes that would enrich the teaching–learning environment.

[1]  Jeffrey H. Johnson,et al.  Personality and learning preferences of students in design and design-related disciplines , 1996 .

[2]  Evelyn McLellan,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching, 2nd Edition: Diana Laurillard, RoutledgeFalmer, 2002, 288pp, price £19.99, ISBN 0-41525-679-8 , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  The Focus-Group Approach as an Alternative for Collecting Faculty Evaluation Data To Improve Teaching. , 1994 .

[4]  Themin Suwardy,et al.  Delivery of Accounting Subjects via the Internet: Student Perceptions , 1998 .

[5]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[6]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[7]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[8]  John Tiffin,et al.  In Search of the Virtual Class: Education in an Information Society , 1995 .

[9]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[10]  Barry Bozeman.  Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method , 2003 .

[11]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Concepts and conceptual frameworks underpinning the ETL project , 2003 .

[12]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Frederick Bennett.  Education and the future , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Carlin Dowling,et al.  Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes? , 2003 .

[15]  Roger Harrison,et al.  Supporting Lifelong Learning: Volume I: Perspectives on Learning , 2001 .

[16]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[17]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition , 1987 .

[18]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[19]  Andrew McDonald,et al.  Accounting Education Through an Online-Supported Virtual Learning Environment , 2004 .

[20]  'Virtual learning environments in business and management: A review of some recent developments' , 2003 .

[21]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-Based and Distance Education , 2000 .

[22]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[23]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Learning and gender: Complexity and possibility , 1998 .

[24]  Alan Rogers.  Activities in self-instructional texts , 1993 .

[25]  U. Lucas.  Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[26]  Martha Stone Wiske,et al.  Teaching for understanding : linking research with practice , 1998 .

[27]  P. Taylor,et al.  Changing expectations: Preparing students for flexible learning , 2000 .

[28]  T INGLES,et al.  An Experience in Learning , 1957, Nursing research.

[29]  A. Dufresne,et al.  Cognitive Style and Its Implications for Navigation Strategies , 1997 .

[30]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[32]  David Kember,et al.  Open Learning Courses for Adults: A Model of Student Progress , 1995 .

[33]  N. Ford,et al.  Gender differences in Internet perceptions and use , 1996 .

[34]  Cd Whittington,et al.  Task‐Oriented Learning on the Web , 1999 .

[35]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[36]  Caroline Ramsey,et al.  Using Virtual Learning Environments to Facilitate New Learning Relationships , 2003 .

[37]  D. Morgan.  7 Focus Group Interviewing , 2001 .

[38]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[39]  L. Unwin,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2002 .

[40]  Khaled Sabry,et al.  Web-based learning interaction and learning styles , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  Themin Suwardy,et al.  Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation , 2003 .

[42]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching 2nd Edition: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies , 2002 .

[43]  Sandra Meredith,et al.  Models of eLearning: Technology Promise vs Learner Needs Literature Review , 2003 .

[44]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[45]  Philip Duchastel.  A Web-Based Model for University Instruction , 1997 .

[46]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning , 2007 .

[47]  Velda McCune,et al.  Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of University Teaching-Learning Environments : Concepts , Measures and Preliminary Findings , 2003 .

[48]  Jill Turnbull,et al.  Transforming Learning Support: An Online Resource Centre for a Diverse Student Population , 2003 .

[49]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[50]  John W. Moore.  Teaching for Understanding , 2002 .

[51]  R. McAleese.  Flexible learning in a digital world – experiences and expectations , 2003 .

[52]  Michael W. Kramer,et al.  Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers , 1997 .

[53]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Taking Teaching Seriously: Meeting the Challenge of Instructional Improvement. ERIC Digest. , 1995 .

[54]  Betty Collis,et al.  Influences on the Educational Use of the WWW, Email and Videoconferencing , 2000 .

[55]  Yehuda E. Kalay,et al.  Virtual Learning Environments , 2003 .

[56]  D. Anderson,et al.  The hidden curriculum. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[57]  Doreen Starke-Meyerring,et al.  Theoretical and practical considerations for virtual learning environments in technical communication: An annotated bibliography , 1999 .

[58]  Adrian Kirkwood,et al.  Understanding Independent Learners' Use of Media Technologies , 2003 .

[59]  Betty Collis,et al.  Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations , 2001 .

[60]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[61]  David L. Morgan,et al.  Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research , 1984 .

[62]  James E. Hunton,et al.  The Use of Technology in the Delivery of Instruction: Implications for Accounting Educators and Education Researchers , 2000 .