End-Therapy Positron Emission Tomography for Treatment ResponseAssessmentinFollicularLymphoma:ASystematic

Purpose: Use of 2[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in postchemotherapyresponseassessmentinfollicularlymphomaisstillacontroversialissue.Here,weconducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the predictive value of FDG-PET in predicting outcome after chemotherapy of follicular lymphoma. Experimental Design: Comprehensive literature search in Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies which evaluate predictive value of end-therapy PET and/or computed tomography (CT) in patients with follicular lymphoma. To quantitatively compare the predictive value ofPETandCT,pooledhazardratios(HRs)comparingprogression-freesurvival(PFS)betweenpatientswith positive and negative results were adopted as the primary indicators for meta-analysis. To explore the efficiency in determining complete remission (CR), pooled CR rates of PET- and CT-based response criteria were calculated. Pooling of these parameters was based on the random-effects model. Results: Review of 285 candidate articles identified eight eligible articles with a total of 577 patients for qualitativereviewandmeta-analysis. ThepooledHRsof end-therapyPETandCTwere5.1[95%confidence interval (CI), 3.7‐7.2] and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2‐5.8), respectively, which implies that PET is more predictive of PFS after chemotherapy than CT. The pooled CR rates of PET- and CT-based response criteria were 75% (95% CI, 70‐79%) and 63% (95% CI, 53‐73%), respectively, which implies that PET is more efficient in distinguishingCR(withoutresidualdisease)fromotherstateswithresidualdisease.Inaddition,qualitative systematic review indicates the same findings. Conclusions:ConsistentevidencefavoringPET-basedtreatmentassessmentshouldbeconsideredinthe management of patients with follicular lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res; 19(23); 6566–77. � 2013 AACR.

[1]  P. Zinzani,et al.  SIE, SIES, GITMO revised guidelines for the management of follicular lymphoma , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[2]  G. Salles,et al.  Impact of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response evaluation in patients with high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy: a prospective study from the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte and GOELAMS. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Armitage,et al.  Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: convention and controversy. , 2012, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  S. Fanti,et al.  FDG PET/CT predictive role in follicular lymphoma , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  M. Tatsumi,et al.  Relevance of monitoring metabolic reduction in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphoma receiving bendamustine: a multicenter study , 2011, Cancer science.

[6]  U. Nestle,et al.  Retrospective web-based multicenter evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and CT derived predictive factors. Radioimmunotherapy with yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan in follicular non Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2010, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[7]  D. Huglo,et al.  FDG-PET in the assessment of patients with follicular lymphoma treated by ibritumomab tiuxetan Y 90: multicentric study. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  R. Houot,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  T. Nihashi,et al.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response assessment before high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, The oncologist.

[10]  D. Rubello,et al.  FDG PET and 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with follicular lymphoma. , 2010, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[11]  G. Salles,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma in the prerituximab era: effect of response quality on survival--A study from the groupe d'etude des lymphomes de l'adulte. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Ora Israel,et al.  18F-FDG Avidity in Lymphoma Readdressed: A Study of 766 Patients , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  S. Pileri,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scan in the Follow-Up of Lymphoma , 2009 .

[14]  R. Wahl,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring the Response of Lymphoma to Radioimmunotherapy , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  O. Imataki,et al.  The utility of FDG-PET for managing patients with malignant lymphoma: analysis of data from a single cancer center. , 2009, Internal medicine.

[16]  S. Swerdlow,et al.  Phase II Trial of Short-Course CHOP-R Followed by 90Y-ibritumomab Tiuxetan and Extended Rituximab in Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  T. Pavlík,et al.  Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of follicular lymphoma: the end of a dilemma? , 2008, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[18]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  Prognostic versus predictive value of biomarkers in oncology. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[19]  T. Nihashi,et al.  18F-FDG PET for Posttherapy Assessment of Hodgkin's Disease and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Systematic Review , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  M. Sydes,et al.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis , 2007, Trials.

[21]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  J. Armitage,et al.  Predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography treated grade 1 and 2 follicular lymphoma , 2007, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[24]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography in the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma. , 2007, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[25]  U. Jaeger,et al.  18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) visualizes follicular lymphoma irrespective of grading. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  C. Dooms,et al.  Positron-emission tomography in prognostic and therapeutic assessment of lung cancer: systematic review. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  J. Armitage,et al.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.