Development of decoding, reading comprehension, vocabulary and spelling during the elementary school years

The goal of this study was (1) to investigate the development of decoding(efficiency), reading comprehension, vocabulary and spelling during theelementary school years and (2) to determine the differences between poor,average and good performers with regard to the development of theseskills. Twice each year two standardized tests for each skill wereadministered. For two successive periods, one of the tests for each skill wasthe same. To describe the development in terms of a latent variable evolvingacross grades, the structured-means version of the structural equationmodel was used. The growth was expressed in terms of effect size. Withrespect to the first question, clear seasonal effects were found for readingcomprehension, vocabulary and spelling, while the seasonal effect fordecoding efficiency was restricted to the early grades. Progress tended tobe greater from fall to spring than from spring to fall. For decodingefficiency, and to a lesser degree for vocabulary and spelling, growthshowed a declining trend across grades. For reading comprehension, theprogress in grade 2 was lower than the progress in grade 3, but progresswas declining across higher grades. With respect to the second question,it appeared that initially low performers on reading comprehension,vocabulary and spelling tended to show a greater progress, especially inperiods where the largest amount of instruction was given. Although it wasfound that the low, medium and high ability groups remain in the sameorder, as far as their means are concerned, these findings do not confirmthe existence of a Matthew effect for reading comprehension, vocabularyand spelling. For decoding efficiency no clear differential effect could befound: the gap between the poor and good performers did not widen overtime for this skill.

[1]  T. W. Anderson.  Maximum Likelihood Estimates for a Multivariate Normal Distribution when Some Observations are Missing , 1957 .

[2]  Marja Vauras,et al.  Development of Text-Processing Skills in High-, Average-, and Low-Achieving Primary School Children , 1994 .

[3]  Johan H. L. Oud,et al.  7. Nonstationary Longitudinal LISREL Model Estimation from Incomplete Panel Data Using EM and the Kalman Smoother , 1996 .

[4]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Merging the Simple View of Reading with Rauding Theory , 1993 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  R. Venezky,et al.  Orthographic structure and spelling-sound regularity in reading English words. , 1987 .

[7]  Lynne Outhred,et al.  An evaluation of Reading Recovery , 1995 .

[8]  M.J.C. Mommers,et al.  An investigation into the relation between word recognition skills, reading comprehension and spelling skills in the first two years of primary school , 1987 .

[9]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Children's literacy environments and early word recognition subskills , 1993 .

[10]  D. Francis,et al.  A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading : results from a longitudinal study , 1995 .

[11]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  The simple view of reading , 1990 .

[12]  R.A.R.G. Jansen.  Constructing monitoring systems in the behavioral sciences: the SEM state space approach , 1997 .

[13]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read , 1987 .

[14]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability , 1986 .

[15]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Conditions of Vocabulary Acquisition , 1991 .

[16]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quar , 1991 .

[17]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Seven-year longitudinal study of the early prediction of reading achievement. , 1985 .

[18]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  ESTIMATION AND TESTING OF SIMPLEX MODELS , 1970 .

[19]  Priscilla L. Griffith,et al.  Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. , 1986 .

[20]  C. Juel.  Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. , 1988 .

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  J.F.J. van Leeuwe,et al.  Het belang van technisch lezen, woordenschat en ruimtelijke intelligentie voor begrijpend lezen. , 1988 .

[23]  K. Taube.  Reading acquisition and self-concept , 1988 .

[24]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[25]  Barbara A. Wasik,et al.  Success for All: A Summary of Research , 1996 .

[26]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[27]  Sam Duker,et al.  Listening and Reading , 1965, The Elementary School Journal.

[28]  Theo Boland.  The importance of being literate: Reading development in primary school and its consequences for the school career in secondary education , 1993 .

[29]  R. Garner.  Metacognition and reading comprehension , 1987 .

[30]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .