Assessment of Driving Simulator Studies on Driver Distraction

The objective of this research is the critical assessment of driving simulator studies on driver distraction. For this purpose 45 scientific papers have been examined with respect to the design of driving simulator experiments on the effects of various sources of driver distraction (in-vehicle or external). More specifically, for each experiment reviewed, several basic characteristics have been recorded and analyzed such as the sample characteristics (size, sex, age distribution), the experiment design (number of trials, duration and type of driving tasks, simulated road and traffic environment), as well as the distraction source examined (cell phone, conversation, visual, music, driver assistance systems, etc.). Through this analysis it was concluded that there is a considerable body of research devoted to driver distraction and the existing studies have contributed useful insights on the effects of distraction on driver behavior and safety. It was revealed that research results are consistent in terms of the sign and magnitude of the effects of distraction, indicating that driving simulators – despite their limitations – are a most useful tool for distracted driving research. However, the analysis also revealed several areas for improvement in the design of future studies. It appears that the design and implementation of such experiments can be carried out in a variety of ways, depending on the research question and the type of simulator, however it is important to conform to experimental design principles. It was found that the majority of existing studies are based on samples between 30-40 participants, in most cases not representative of the general population, and for which statistical power is not always reported. The number and duration of experiment trials vary considerably, not always proportionally to the number of parameters examined, complicating the comparability of the studies. The most common distraction sources examined are visual distraction and cell phone use, while other sources of distraction have received notably less attention in existing studies. The simulated road environment of most experiments was rural, whereas far less is known on the effects of distraction in urban areas; furthermore, ambient traffic is not explicitly simulated and the effect of traffic flow on distracted driving may be a key question for further investigation. Finally, driver distraction is expressed by a number of measures, in terms of its impact to driver attention (hands-off the wheel, eyes-off the road), driver behavior (vehicle speed, headway, lateral position, driver reaction time) and driver accident risk. Although these different measures describe different aspects of the distracted driving mechanism, it would be important to focus on the most sensitive ones, keeping in mind the entire chain of distracted driving causes and impacts, in order to significantly enhance the potential of exploitation of the results of existing studies.

[1]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Mark B Johnson,et al.  Living Dangerously: Driver Distraction at High Speed , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[3]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Conversing while driving: The importance of visual information for conversation modulation , 2011 .

[4]  A. Singhal,et al.  The emotional side of cognitive distraction: Implications for road safety. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Y Ian Noy,et al.  Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  William P. Berg,et al.  The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking , 2009 .

[7]  Sarah Ting,et al.  Psychological predictors of college students' cell phone use while driving. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  The blind date: the effects of change blindness, passenger conversation and gender on looked-but-failed-to-see (LBFTS) errors. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Frank A. Drews,et al.  Passenger and Cell-Phone Conversations in Simulated Driving , 2004 .

[11]  Timothy Chamberlain,et al.  The effect of audio materials from a rear-seat audiovisual entertainment system or from radio on simulated driving , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Samuel G Charlton,et al.  Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Samuel G Charlton,et al.  The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Corinne Brusque,et al.  Does making a conversation asynchronous reduce the negative impact of phone call on driving , 2009 .

[16]  George Yannis,et al.  Is it Risky to Talk, Eat, or Smoke While Driving? Findings from a Driving Simulator Experiment , 2011 .

[17]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving , 2005 .

[18]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  The effect of visual and cognitive distraction on driver’s anticipation in a simulated car following scenario , 2011 .

[19]  Claudia J. Stanny,et al.  Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving , 2007 .

[20]  B. Reimer,et al.  The impact of distractions on young adult drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Crash dieting: the effects of eating and drinking on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Edward M Bernat,et al.  Combined effects of alcohol and distraction on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Johan Engström,et al.  Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty , 2005 .

[24]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Conflicts of interest: The implications of roadside advertising for driver attention , 2009 .

[25]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Drivers' attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies , 2006 .

[26]  M. Fillmore,et al.  Alcohol and distraction interact to impair driving performance. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[27]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  Salaheddine Bendak,et al.  The role of roadside advertising signs in distracting drivers. , 2010 .

[29]  John R. Treat,et al.  A study of precrash factors involved in traffic accidents , 1980 .

[30]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Driver distraction : a review of the literature , 2007 .

[31]  John D Lee,et al.  Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Yulan Liang,et al.  Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior , 2012 .

[33]  J Lockhart,et al.  The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  D. E Haigney,et al.  Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes , 2000 .

[35]  D Basacik,et al.  Investigating driver distraction: the effects of video and static advertising: a driving simulator study , 2009 .

[36]  Simone Benedetto,et al.  Driver workload and eye blink duration , 2011 .

[37]  Daryl Lloyd,et al.  Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report , 2013 .

[38]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The relationship between distraction and driving performance: towards a test regime for in-vehicle information systems , 2005 .

[39]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Effects of Passenger and Cellular Phone Conversations on Driver Distraction , 2004 .

[41]  Eve Mitsopoulos-Rubens,et al.  The effects of using a portable music player on simulated driving performance and task-sharing strategies. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[42]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Distraction while driving: The case of older drivers , 2011 .

[43]  John D. Lee,et al.  Defining Driver Distraction , 2009 .

[44]  Kristie L Young,et al.  A simulator study of the effects of singing on driving performance. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[45]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[46]  B. Metz,et al.  Attention during visual secondary tasks in driving: Adaptation to the demands of the driving task , 2011 .

[47]  David Shinar,et al.  Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[48]  Lana M Trick,et al.  Testing assumptions implicit in the use of the 15-second rule as an early predictor of whether an in-vehicle device produces unacceptable levels of distraction. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[49]  L Garay-Vega,et al.  Evaluation of different speech and touch interfaces to in-vehicle music retrieval systems. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[50]  Michelle L. Reyes,et al.  Effects of cognitive load presence and duration on driver eye movements and event detection performance , 2008 .

[51]  M. Lesch,et al.  Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements? , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.