Societies, whose publishing programmes are primarily mission‐driven, play a unique role in funding and disseminating research. But by their nature – often small and with limited resources – they are particularly prone to the turbulence currently affecting scholarly publishing. BMJ Journals is itself a society publisher but also publishes under contract for other societies. During 2008, we carried out research to assess societies' evolving needs from their publishing partnerships. The changing expectations and behaviours of the next generation of researchers are considered to be as much of a threat as declining revenues. Societies are planning to expand professional development activities and to maximise their use of emerging technologies to help maintain and grow membership. Although surplus is a low priority for societies and, accordingly, for their publishing programmes, a high financial return is nonetheless a key criterion when choosing publishing partners – as are reputation, technological innovation, and individual title development.
[1]
Mark Ware.
Choosing a publishing partner: advice for societies and associations
,
2008,
Learn. Publ..
[2]
David Bull,et al.
What do societies and publishers want from publishing partnerships?
,
2000,
Learn. Publ..
[3]
Alma Swan,et al.
Open access self-archiving: An author study
,
2005
.
[4]
Sally Morris,et al.
Mapping the journal publishing landscape: how much do we know?
,
2007,
Learn. Publ..
[5]
Sally Morris,et al.
Learned society members and open access
,
2009,
Learn. Publ..
[6]
Mary Waltham.
Learned society business models and open access: overview of a recent JISC‐funded study
,
2006,
Learn. Publ..
[7]
Raym Crow.
Publishing cooperatives: an alternative for society publishers
,
2006
.