An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for SNSs: Analyzing Self-Disclosure and Self-Withdrawal in a Representative U.S. Sample

The privacy calculus established that online self-disclosures are based on a cost-benefit tradeoff. For the context of SNSs, however, the privacy calculus still needs further support as most studies consist of small student samples and analyze self-disclosure only, excluding self-withdrawal e.g., the deletion of posts, which is essential in SNS contexts. Thus, this study used a U.S. representative sample to test the privacy calculus' generalizability and extend its theoretical framework by including both self-withdrawal behaviors and privacy self-efficacy. Results confirmed the extended privacy calculus model. Moreover, both privacy concerns and privacy self-efficacy positively predicted use of self-withdrawal. With regard to predicting self-disclosure in SNSs, benefits outweighed privacy concerns; regarding self-withdrawal, privacy concerns outweighed both privacy self-efficacy and benefits.

[1]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[2]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies , 2013, MIS Q..

[3]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2015 .

[4]  Monika Taddicken,et al.  The 'Privacy Paradox' in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure1 , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Marko Hölbl,et al.  Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure: The case of Facebook , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Privacy and Communication , 1982 .

[8]  Jinyoung Min,et al.  How are people enticed to disclose personal information despite privacy concerns in social network sites? The calculus between benefit and cost , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[10]  Yoon Hyung Choi,et al.  Self‐Disclosure Characteristics and Motivations in Social Media: Extending the Functional Model to Multiple Social Network Sites , 2015 .

[11]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Do men and women differ in privacy? Gendered privacy and (in)equality in the Internet , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Xi Chen,et al.  Factors affecting privacy disclosure on social network sites: an integrated model , 2010, Electronic Commerce Research.

[13]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  R. Rogers.  Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of prote , 1983 .

[15]  Oliver Günther,et al.  Self-disclosure and Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Culture , 2012, WI 2012.

[16]  S. Utz,et al.  The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms , 2009 .

[17]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Sabine Trepte,et al.  Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors , 2015 .

[19]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[20]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online , 2013, Commun. Res..

[21]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[22]  John Leubsdorf,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .

[23]  Xiangbin Yan,et al.  Information disclosure on social networking sites: An intrinsic-extrinsic motivation perspective , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[25]  Emily Christofides,et al.  Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Impression Management 2.0 , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[27]  R. Laufer,et al.  Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory , 1977 .

[28]  Yongqiang Sun,et al.  Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  L. Reinecke,et al.  Influence of Social Support Received in Online and Offline Contexts on Satisfaction With Social Support and Satisfaction With Life: A Longitudinal Study , 2015 .

[30]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Keeping our network safe: a model of online protection behaviour , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Zach W. Y. Lee,et al.  Self-disclosure in social networking sites: The role of perceived cost, perceived benefits and social influence , 2015, Internet Res..

[32]  Kevin Wise,et al.  The Real You? The Role of Visual Cues and Comment Congruence in Perceptions of Social Attractiveness from Facebook Profiles , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[35]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[36]  Norshidah Mohamed,et al.  Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..