How well can hillslope evolution models “explain” topography? Simulating soil transport and production with high-resolution topographic data

The morphology of hillslopes is a direct refl ection of tectonic forcing and climatic and biologic processes that drive soil production, mobilization, and transport. Soil transport on hillslopes affects river incision by providing tools for channel abrasion and controls the distribution of sediment that infl uences aquatic habitat. Although numerous hillslope transport relationships have been proposed over the past 60+ years, a comprehensive analysis of model predictions for a real landscape has not been performed. Here, we use high-resolution topographic data obtained via airborne laser swath mapping (ALSM) to simulate the long-term evolution of Oregon Coast Range hillslopes and test three published transport models and a new model that accounts for nonlinear depth- and slopedependent transport. Analysis of one-dimensional, steady-state solutions for these four models suggests that plots of gradient-curvature may be diagnostic for distinguishing model predictions. To evaluate two-dimensional model predictions for our fi eld site, we assumed local steady-state erosion for a 72,000 m 2 sequence of hillslopes and valleys. After calibrating each of the four models, we imposed constant base-level lowering for cells within the valley network, simulated 500,000 yr of soil production and transport, and determined which transport model best preserved morphologic patterns that describe the current landscape form. Models for which fl ux varies proportionally with hillslope gradient generated broadly convex hilltops inconsistent with the sharp-crested, steep-sided slopes of our study site, whereas the two nonlinear slope-dependent models produced convex-planar slopes consistent with current hillslope form. Our proposed nonlinear slope- and depth-dependent model accounts for how soil thickness controls the magnitude of biogenic disturbances that drive transport; this model best preserved the current landscape form, particularly the narrow, sharply convex hilltops characteristic of the Oregon Coast Range. According to our formulation, which provides an explicit linkage for relating the distribution of biota to hillslope processes, the degree of hilltop convexity varies nonlinearly with the ratio of erosion rate to maximum soil production rate, highlighting the profound infl uence of soil depth on hillslope evolution.

[1]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall , 1997 .

[2]  R. Beschta Long-Term Patterns of Sediment Production Following Road Construction and Logging in the Oregon Coast Range , 1978 .

[3]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes , 1996, Oecologia.

[4]  D. J. Petley,et al.  The Existence of Threshold Hillslopes in the Denudation of the Landscape , 1970 .

[5]  M. Caffee,et al.  Using Cosmogenic Nuclide Measurements In Sediments To Understand Background Rates Of Erosion And Sediment Transport , 2001 .

[6]  J. Roering,et al.  Fire and the evolution of steep, soil-mantled landscapes , 2005 .

[7]  S. Fagherazzi,et al.  Stability of creeping soil and implications for hillslope evolution , 2001 .

[8]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Stochastic processes of soil production and transport: erosion rates, topographic variation and cosmogenic nuclides in the Oregon Coast Range , 2001 .

[9]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Process-based model linking pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) activity to sediment transport and soil thickness , 2005 .

[10]  J. Lovell Tyee Formation: Undeformed Turbidites and their Lateral Equivalents:Mineralogy and Paleogeography , 1969 .

[11]  D. Montgomery Slope Distributions, Threshold Hillslopes, and Steady-state Topography , 2001 .

[12]  William C. Orr,et al.  Geology of Oregon , 1976 .

[13]  H. Kooi,et al.  Escarpment evolution on high‐elevation rifted margins: Insights derived from a surface processes model that combines diffusion, advection, and reaction , 1994 .

[14]  Torsten Schaub,et al.  The variability of root cohesion as an influence on shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range , 2001 .

[15]  Arthur Newell Strahler,et al.  Equilibrium theory of erosional slopes approached by frequency distribution analysis; Part II , 1950 .

[16]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Modelling landscape evolution on geological time scales: a new method based on irregular spatial discretization , 1997 .

[17]  S. F. Personius,et al.  Late Quaternary stream incision and uplift in the forearc of the Cascadia subduction zone , 1995 .

[18]  G. Tucker,et al.  Erosional dynamics, flexural isostasy, and long-lived escarpments: A numerical modeling study , 1994 .

[19]  Jean Braun,et al.  Sediment transport mechanisms on soil-mantled hillslopes , 2001 .

[20]  E. Gabet Gopher bioturbation: field evidence for non-linear hillslope diffusion. , 2000 .

[21]  A. Howard A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolution , 1994 .

[22]  Alan D. Howard,et al.  BADLAND MORPHOLOGY AND EVOLUTION: INTERPRETATION USING A SIMULATION MODEL , 1997 .

[23]  G. K. Gilbert The Convexity of Hilltops , 1909, The Journal of Geology.

[24]  D. Rhodes,et al.  Hillslope development in areas of active tectonics , 1996 .

[25]  J. Bockheim,et al.  Quaternary upper plate deformation in coastal Oregon , 1996 .

[26]  J. Roering Soil creep and convex‐upward velocity profiles: theoretical and experimental investigation of disturbance‐driven sediment transport on hillslopes , 2004 .

[27]  W. Culling Soil Creep and the Development of Hillside Slopes , 1963, The Journal of Geology.

[28]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Sediment budget for a small catchment in mountainous terrain , 1978 .

[29]  W. Dietrich,et al.  The search for a topographic signature of life , 2006, Nature.

[30]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Valley incision by debris flows: Evidence of a topographic signature , 2003 .

[31]  J. Roering,et al.  Systematic variation of bedrock channel gradients in the central Oregon Coast Range: implications for rock uplift and shallow landsliding , 2004 .

[32]  P. O. Koons,et al.  The topographic evolution of collisional mountain belts; a numerical look at the Southern Alps, New Zealand , 1989 .

[33]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1998 .

[34]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory , 1991 .

[35]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Chemical weathering and runoff chemistry in a steep headwater catchment , 2001 .

[36]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Erosion of steepland valleys by debris flows , 2006 .

[37]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Late Quaternary erosion in southeastern Australia: a field example using cosmogenic nuclides , 2001 .

[38]  J. Braun,et al.  A parametric study of soil transport mechanisms , 2006 .

[39]  K. Whipple,et al.  The Relation Between Topography and Millennial Erosion Rates in the San Gabriel Mountains, California , 2005 .

[40]  N Strahler Arthur,et al.  Equilibrium theory of erosional slopes approached by frequency distribution analysis , 1973 .

[41]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Hillslope evolution by nonlinear, slope‐dependent transport: Steady state morphology and equilibrium adjustment timescales , 2001 .

[42]  R. Yeats,et al.  Tectonics of the Neogene Cascadia forearc basin: Investigations of a deformed late Miocene unconformity , 2000 .

[43]  Sean D. Willett,et al.  Orogeny and orography: The effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts , 1999 .

[44]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Hillslope evolution by diffusive processes: The timescale for equilibrium adjustments , 1997 .

[45]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Hillslope evolution by nonlinear creep and landsliding: An experimental study , 2001 .

[46]  F. Ahnert,et al.  Local relief and the height limits of mountain ranges , 1984 .

[47]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[48]  Peter C. Almond,et al.  Constraining climatic controls on hillslope dynamics using a coupled model for the transport of soil and tracers: Application to loess‐mantled hillslopes, South Island, New Zealand , 2004 .

[49]  W. Culling,et al.  Analytical Theory of Erosion , 1960, The Journal of Geology.

[50]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Evidence for nonlinear, diffusive sediment transport on hillslopes and implications for landscape morphology , 1999 .

[51]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Forest clearing and regional landsliding , 2000 .

[52]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Characterizing structural and lithologic controls on deep-seated landsliding: Implications for topographic relief and landscape evolution in the Oregon Coast Range, USA , 2005 .

[53]  F. Ahnert Functional relationships between denudation, relief, and uplift in large, mid-latitude drainage basins , 1970 .

[54]  P. Vincent,et al.  Present‐day vertical deformation of the Cascadia Margin, Pacific Northwest, United States , 1994 .

[55]  W. Davis THE CONVEX PROFILE OF BAD-LAND DIVIDES. , 1892, Science.

[56]  D. Tarboton,et al.  Modeling of the interactions between forest vegetation, disturbances, and sediment yields , 2004 .

[57]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Active tectonics in southern Xinjiang, China: Analysis of terrace riser and normal fault scarp degradation along the Hotan‐Qira Fault System , 1993 .

[58]  F. Bretherton,et al.  Stability and the conservation of mass in drainage basin evolution , 1972 .

[59]  Robert S. Anderson,et al.  Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay , 1994 .

[60]  S. Mudd,et al.  Responses of soil‐mantled hillslopes to transient channel incision rates , 2007 .

[61]  Efi Foufoula-Georgiou,et al.  Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets , 2007 .

[62]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel Initiation and the Problem of Landscape Scale , 1992, Science.

[63]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Mechanistic soil–landscape modelling as an approach to developing pedogenetic classifications , 2006 .

[64]  Jean Braun,et al.  Numerical modelling of landscape evolution on geological time‐scales: a parameter analysis and comparison with the south‐eastern highlands of Australia , 1998 .

[65]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Fitting degradation of shoreline scarps by a nonlinear diffusion model , 1987 .

[66]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges , 2002 .

[67]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[68]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  EROSION RATES IN THE SOUTHERN OREGON COAST RANGE: EVIDENCE FOR AN EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN HILLSLOPE EROSION AND SEDIMENT YIELD , 1991 .

[69]  Robert S. Anderson,et al.  Modeling the tor-dotted crests, bedrock edges, and parabolic profiles of high alpine surfaces of the Wind River Range, Wyoming , 2002 .

[70]  W. Dietrich,et al.  The illusion of diffusion: Field evidence for depth-dependent sediment transport , 2005 .

[71]  E. Baldwin Geologic map of the lower Siuslaw River area, Oregon , 1956 .

[72]  L. Benda,et al.  Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow , 1997 .

[73]  H. A. Mooney,et al.  Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale , 1996, Oecologia.

[74]  J. Roering,et al.  Using soil residence time to delineate spatial and temporal patterns of transient landscape response , 2007 .

[75]  K. Ridgway,et al.  Geological Society of America Bulletin , 1997 .

[76]  Nicholas Brozovic,et al.  Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas , 1996, Nature.

[77]  O. Reichman,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF BIOTURBATION ON SOIL PROCESSES AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT , 2003 .

[78]  R. Dott,et al.  Shelf and Deep-Sea Sedimentation in Eocene Forearc Basin, Western Oregon--Fan or Non-Fan? , 1983 .