Optimal Location Analysis of Delivery Parcel-Pickup Points Using AHP and Network Huff Model: A Case Study of Shiweitang Sub-District in Guangzhou City, China

The use of parcel-pickup points (PPPs) is an effective approach for solving the last-mile problem. However, few studies provide specific guidance for the optimal organization of PPPs. Here, a geographic information system(GIS)-based hybrid model was developed combining the widely used analytic hierarchy process (AHP) multi-criteria analysis method with the Huff model that predicts the number of visiting customers to determine the optimal facility for collaboration and service as a PPP. Using this model, a decision-maker can select the highest-ranking facility or use the fluctuation ranking graph to determine a priority list of candidate facilities according to the appropriate PPP service distance. Our findings suggest that the optimal candidate facility should be located near high population density areas, a dense road network, and few geographic barriers. The facility should have a high attractiveness value, long business hours, and convenient access to public transportation, cover a large, high-population area, and should be a retail chain store. Based on these findings, the AHP method can improve the accuracy of obtaining the facility attractiveness value using the Huff model. Facility attractiveness has a strong effect on the resulting number of customers in the case of acceptably long distances to residential buildings.

[1]  E. Voorde,et al.  Characteristics and Typology of Last-mile Logistics from an Innovation Perspective in an Urban Context , 2011 .

[2]  Tony Hernandez,et al.  Enhancing retail location decision support: The development and application of geovisualization , 2007 .

[3]  Klaus D Goepel,et al.  Implementation of an Online Software Tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS) , 2018, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

[4]  A. McKinnon,et al.  Comparative analysis of the carbon footprints of conventional and online retailing: A “last mile” perspective , 2010 .

[5]  M. Ranagalage,et al.  Modeling the drivers of urban land use changes in Lusaka, Zambia using multi-criteria evaluation: An analytic network process approach , 2020 .

[6]  Chee Yew Wong,et al.  Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach , 2010 .

[7]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  Cost modelling and simulation of last-mile characteristics in an innovative B2C supply chain environment with implications on urban areas and cities , 2014 .

[8]  Andrew T. Collins Behavioural Influences on the Environmental Impact of Collection/Delivery Points , 2015 .

[9]  James J. Wang,et al.  Understanding the diversity of final delivery solutions for online retailing: A case of Shenzhen, China , 2017 .

[10]  James J. Wang,et al.  Co-evolution between etailing and parcel express industry and its geographical imprints: The case of China , 2015 .

[11]  R. Suárez-Vega,et al.  A multi-criteria GIS based procedure to solve a network competitive location problem , 2011 .

[12]  Carlos Henggeler Antunes,et al.  A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  David L. Huff,et al.  Defining and Estimating a Trading Area , 1964 .

[14]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  E-commerce last-mile in Belgium: Developing an external cost delivery index , 2017 .

[15]  Anrong Dang,et al.  Application of network Huff model for commercial network planning at suburban – Taking Wujin district, Changzhou as a case , 2013, Ann. GIS.

[16]  Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi,et al.  Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach , 2020, Financial Innovation.

[17]  Alan C. McKinnon,et al.  Unattended delivery to the home: an assessment of the security implications , 2003 .

[18]  P. Harker Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[19]  Sanjit Kumar Roy,et al.  Customer engagement behaviors: The role of service convenience, fairness and quality , 2018, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[20]  Klaus D. Goepel,et al.  Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process - A New Approach , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[21]  Fan Wu,et al.  Social Sustainability and Redevelopment of Urban Villages in China: A Case Study of Guangzhou , 2018, Sustainability.

[22]  Rosaria de F. S. M. Russo,et al.  Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature , 2015, ITQM.

[23]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce , 2004 .

[24]  Florent Joerin,et al.  Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Kum Fai Yuen,et al.  An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery , 2018, Transport Policy.

[26]  Yuji Murayama,et al.  A GIS Approach to Estimation of Building Population for Micro‐spatial Analysis , 2009, Trans. GIS.

[27]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Last Mile Distribution in Humanitarian Relief , 2008, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[28]  Eleonora Morganti,et al.  Final Deliveries for Online Shopping: The Deployment of Pickup Point Networks in Urban and Suburban Areas , 2014 .

[29]  Xu Xin,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Smart Grid based on AHP-Entropy Method , 2012 .

[30]  J. Holmström,et al.  Solving the last mile issue: reception box or delivery box? , 2001 .

[31]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Geographical information systems and location science , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[33]  Antonio Scala,et al.  Sparse and distributed Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2017, Autom..