Bladder augmentation using acellular collagen biomatrix: a pilot experience in exstrophic patients

PurposeA preliminary experience on in vivo bladder wall regeneration in a subset of patients born with exstrophy–epispadias complex is reported. The objective was to improve bladder capacity and compliance without bowel augmentation.MethodsFive patients (3 males, 2 females), mean age 10.4 years, presenting poor bladder capacity and compliance after complete exstrophy repair, underwent bladder augmentation using small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffold. Ultrasonography, cystoscopy with cystogram, assessment of bladder volume and compliance and bladder biopsy were performed before surgery (T0), at 6 (T1) and 18 months (T2) follow-up. Histology was compared with normal bladder specimens. Wilcoxon test was adopted for statistics.ResultsBladder capacity and compliance resulted increased (+30%) at T1 (p < 0.05) and remained stable at T2, despite dry intervals did not changed significantly. Bladder biopsy at T1 showed no evidence of SIS, but normal transitional mucosa and sero-muscular layer containing smooth muscle fascicles, small nerve trunks and vessels within abundant type-3 collagen. Muscle/collagen ratio was decreased compared with controls at T1 and T2 (p < 0.05). No kidney damage, bladder diverticula, or stones were observed at 3 years follow-up.ConclusionsBladder regeneration was feasible in these patients, but bladder capacity and compliance was poorly increased to obtain significant clinical benefit. Histology showed poor muscle components. The acellular matrix grafting failed to provide long-term effective results in terms of continence achievement.

[1]  J. Pope,et al.  The use of small intestinal submucosa as an off-the-shelf urethral sling material for pediatric urinary incontinence. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[2]  B. Kropp Small-intestinal submucosa for bladder augmentation: a review of preclinical studies , 1998, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Intestinocystoplasty and total bladder replacement in children and young adults: followup in 129 cases. , 1987, The Journal of urology.

[4]  A. Vidlář,et al.  Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. , 2007, European urology.

[5]  R. Benelli,et al.  Bladder cell culture on small intestinal submucosa as bioscaffold: experimental study on engineered urothelial grafts. , 2004, European urology.

[6]  S. Badylak,et al.  Small intestinal submucosa: a rapidly resorbed bioscaffold for augmentation cystoplasty in a dog model. , 1998, Tissue engineering.

[7]  D. Husmann,et al.  Long-term follow up of enteric bladder augmentations: the risk for malignancy. , 2008, Journal of pediatric urology.

[8]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Ureteral reconstruction: small intestine submucosa for the management of strictures and defects of the upper third of the ureter. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[9]  A. Mundy,et al.  Augmentation cystoplasty , 2001, BJU international.

[10]  U. Nagele,et al.  In vitro investigations of tissue-engineered multilayered urothelium established from bladder washings. , 2008, European urology.

[11]  E. Oosterwijk,et al.  Urethral reconstruction of critical defects in rabbits using molecularly defined tubular type I collagen biomatrices: key issues in growth factor addition. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[12]  E. Cheng,et al.  Urologic tissue engineering with small-intestinal submucosa: potential clinical applications , 2000, World Journal of Urology.

[13]  E. Tanagho,et al.  Organ-specific acellular matrix for reconstruction of the urinary tract , 2000, World Journal of Urology.

[14]  R. Boldrini,et al.  In vivo bladder regeneration using small intestinal submucosa: experimental study , 2006, Pediatric Surgery International.

[15]  A. Freeman,et al.  Routine surveillance cystoscopy for patients with augmentation and substitution cystoplasty for benign urological conditions: is it necessary? , 2009, BJU international.

[16]  P. Caione,et al.  Pelvic floor reconstruction in female exstrophic complex patients: different results from males? , 2007, European urology.

[17]  M. Grynberg,et al.  Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) perspectives en chirurgie urogénitale , 2005 .

[18]  D. Canning A long-term follow-up of autoaugmentation in myelodysplastic children. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[19]  V. Molinie,et al.  Development of a seeded scaffold in the great omentum: feasibility of an in vivo bioreactor for bladder tissue engineering. , 2007, European urology.

[20]  G. Jakse,et al.  Different Types of Scaffolds for Reconstruction of the Urinary Tract by Tissue Engineering , 2007, Urologia Internationalis.

[21]  A. Atala Tissue engineering for the replacement of organ function in the genitourinary system , 2004, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[22]  James J. Yoo,et al.  Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty , 2006, The Lancet.

[23]  J. Southgate,et al.  Tissue engineering and stem cell research in urology , 2003, BJU international.

[24]  E. Palminteri,et al.  Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short-term results. , 2007, European urology.

[25]  A. Fierabracci,et al.  Identification and characterization of adult stem/progenitor cells in the human bladder (bladder spheroids): perspectives of application in pediatric surgery , 2007, Pediatric Surgery International.

[26]  R C Harruff,et al.  Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute. , 1995, Urology.

[27]  C. Bosman,et al.  Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[28]  S. Gorham,et al.  The in vitro assessment of a collagen/vicryl (polyglactin) composite film together with candidate suture materials for use in urinary tract surgery , 1987, Urological Research.