Evolution of gene order conservation in prokaryotes

BackgroundAs more complete genomes are sequenced, conservation of gene order between different organisms is emerging as an informative property of the genomes. Conservation of gene order has been used for predicting function and functional interactions of proteins, as well as for studying the evolutionary relationships between genomes. The reasons for the maintenance of gene order are still not well understood, as the organization of the prokaryote genome into operons and lateral gene transfer cannot possibly account for all the instances of conservation found. Comprehensive studies of gene order are one way of elucidating the nature of these maintaining forces.ResultsGene order is extensively conserved between closely related species, but rapidly becomes less conserved among more distantly related organisms, probably in a cooperative fashion. This trend could be universal in prokaryotic genomes, as archaeal genomes are likely to behave similarly to bacterial genomes. Gene order conservation could therefore be used as a valid phylogenetic measure to study relationships between species. Even between very distant species, remnants of gene order conservation exist in the form of highly conserved clusters of genes. This suggests the existence of selective processes that maintain the organization of these regions. Because the clusters often span more than one operon, common regulation probably cannot be invoked as the cause of the maintenance of gene order.ConclusionsGene order conservation is a genomic measure that can be useful for studying relationships between prokaryotes and the evolutionary forces shaping their genomes. Gene organization is extensively conserved in some genomic regions, and further studies are needed to elucidate the reason for this conservation.

[1]  J R Roth,et al.  Selfish operons: horizontal transfer may drive the evolution of gene clusters. , 1996, Genetics.

[2]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Prediction of operons in microbial genomes. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  M. Hattori,et al.  Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS , 2000, Nature.

[4]  J. Andersson Evolutionary genomics: Is Buchnera a bacterium or an organelle? , 2000, Current Biology.

[5]  Chris Sander,et al.  EUCLID: automatic classification of proteins in functional classes by their database annotations , 1998, Bioinform..

[6]  L. Orgel,et al.  Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree , 1999 .

[7]  P. Bork,et al.  Measuring genome evolution. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P Bork,et al.  Gene context conservation of a higher order than operons. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[9]  D. A. Palmieri,et al.  The genome sequence of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa , 2000, Nature.

[10]  C. Sander,et al.  Genome sequences and great expectations , 2000, Genome Biology.

[11]  N. Moran,et al.  A molecular clock in endosymbiotic bacteria is calibrated using the insect hosts , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  R. Overbeek,et al.  The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  B. Snel,et al.  Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  T. Galitski,et al.  Rearrangements of the Bacterial Chromosome : Formation and Applications , 1999 .

[15]  Diarmaid Hughes,et al.  Evaluating genome dynamics: the constraints on rearrangements within bacterial genomes , 2000, Genome Biology.

[16]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  RegulonDB (version 3.2): transcriptional regulation and operon organization in Escherichia coli K-12 , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Warren C. Lathe,et al.  Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. , 2000, Genome research.

[18]  A. Valencia,et al.  Conserved Clusters of Functionally Related Genes in Two Bacterial Genomes , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[19]  B. Snel,et al.  Gene and context: integrative approaches to genome analysis. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[20]  Doolittle Wf Phylogenetic Classification and the Universal Tree , 1999 .

[21]  H. Philippe,et al.  Archaea sister group of Bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  P Guerdoux-Jamet,et al.  Mapping the bacterial cell architecture into the chromosome. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  B. Snel,et al.  Genome phylogeny based on gene content , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[24]  J A Eisen,et al.  Assessing evolutionary relationships among microbes from whole-genome analysis. , 2000, Current opinion in microbiology.

[25]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and Bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima , 1999, Nature.

[26]  S. Fitz-Gibbon,et al.  Whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  J. Tamames,et al.  Bringing gene order into bacterial shape. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  H. Mori,et al.  Evolutionary instability of operon structures disclosed by sequence comparisons of complete microbial genomes. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  B. Dujon,et al.  The genomic tree as revealed from whole proteome comparisons. , 1999, Genome research.