A continuum model of motility in ameboid cells

A continuum model of cell motility in ameboid cells based on a viscoelastic description of the cytoplasm and active stress generation controlled by extracellular signals is developed and analyzed. The characteristics of locomotion depend on the specific active stress, elastic and viscous properties of the cytoplasm as well as on the strength of cell-substrate interactions. A one-dimensional version of the model is applied to describe the motion of a fibroblast. The force balance equation for the cell is solved together with reaction diffusion equations describing the dynamics of proteins essential for cell locomotion. The cell deformation is calculated, and the deformation patterns observed experimentally are reproduced by the model. The cell velocity as a function of cell-substrate interaction is also computed for various cell characteristics such as the active stress generated, the cell elasticity and the coupling between cell-substrate interaction and the ability of the cell to contract.

[1]  T. Kreis,et al.  Guidebook to the extracellular matrix, anchor, and adhesion proteins , 1999 .

[2]  J. Parsons,et al.  Integrin connections map: to infinity and beyond. , 2002, Science.

[3]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Selective regulation of integrin–cytoskeleton interactions by the tyrosine kinase Src , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Marina Chicurel,et al.  Cell Migration Research Is on the Move , 2002, Science.

[5]  G I Zahalak,et al.  Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[6]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[7]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase is involved in mechanosensing during fibroblast migration , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  F. MacKintosh.  Theoretical models of viscoelasticity of actin solutions and the actin cortex. , 1998, The Biological bulletin.

[9]  P. Hollenbeck.  Cytoskeleton: Microtubules get the signal , 2001, Current Biology.

[10]  K Luby-Phelps,et al.  Viscoelastic response of fibroblasts to tension transmitted through adherens junctions. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Paul Martin,et al.  Structures in focus--filopodia. , 2002, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[12]  R Skalak,et al.  Passive deformations and active motions of leukocytes. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  E. Elson,et al.  Mechanics of fibroblast locomotion: quantitative analysis of forces and motions at the leading lamellas of fibroblasts , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Irina Kaverina,et al.  Regulation of substrate adhesion dynamics during cell motility. , 2002, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[15]  R L Juliano,et al.  Integrin signaling and cell growth control. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  M. Dembo,et al.  Distinct roles of frontal and rear cell-substrate adhesions in fibroblast migration. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[17]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[18]  N. Caille,et al.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Strain Hardening of Actin Filament Networks , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[21]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Regulation of actin dynamics in rapidly moving cells: a quantitative analysis. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[22]  J. Faix,et al.  Rac1 GTPases control filopodia formation, cell motility, endocytosis, cytokinesis and development in Dictyostelium. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[23]  W Alt,et al.  Cytoplasm dynamics and cell motion: two-phase flow models. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[24]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[25]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[26]  A. Huttenlocher,et al.  Regulation of integrin‐mediated adhesion during cell migration , 1998, Microscopy research and technique.

[27]  H. Othmer,et al.  A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Actin-Based Cell Motility and Cell Locomotion , 1996, Cell.

[29]  George Oster,et al.  How nematode sperm crawl. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[30]  P. Janmey.  The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[31]  D. Lauffenburger.  A simple model for the effects of receptor-mediated cell—substratum adhesion on cell migration , 1989 .

[32]  R. Skalak,et al.  Leukocyte deformability: finite element modeling of large viscoelastic deformation. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  P. Maini,et al.  Mathematical Models for Biological Pattern Formation , 2001 .

[34]  Robert E. Buxbaum,et al.  Direct Observations of the Mechanical Behaviors of the Cytoskeleton in Living Fibroblasts , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  S Chien,et al.  Membrane model of endothelial cells and leukocytes. A proposal for the origin of a cortical stress. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[36]  M. Titus,et al.  Myosin I Phosphorylation Is Increased by Chemotactic Stimulation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  J. Heath,et al.  Actin alone in lamellipodia , 1991, Nature.

[38]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[39]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[40]  J. Bonner,et al.  A way of following individual cells in the migrating slugs of Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[42]  D. Soll.  The use of computers in understanding how animal cells crawl. , 1995, International review of cytology.

[43]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[44]  A. Mogilner,et al.  A Simple 1-D Physical Model for the Crawling Nematode Sperm Cell , 2003, Journal of statistical physics.

[45]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm , 1999, Current Biology.

[46]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin dynamics on the tail region of migrating fibroblasts. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[48]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Cell migration as a five-step cycle. , 1999, Biochemical Society symposium.

[49]  Erich Sackmann,et al.  Dictyostelium cells' cytoplasm as an active viscoplastic body , 2001, European Biophysics Journal.

[50]  E. Evans,et al.  Cortical shell-liquid core model for passive flow of liquid-like spherical cells into micropipets. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[51]  J. Butler,et al.  Intracellular elasticity and viscosity in the body, leading, and trailing regions of locomoting neutrophils. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[52]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells , 1991, Nature.

[53]  M. Dembo,et al.  Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[54]  M. Sheetz,et al.  A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  H. Haga,et al.  Drastic change of local stiffness distribution correlating to cell migration in living fibroblasts. , 2001, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[56]  J. Small,et al.  Microfilament-based motility in non-muscle cells. , 1989, Current opinion in cell biology.

[57]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  A Minimal Model of Locomotion Applied to the Steady Gliding Movement of Fish Keratocyte Cells , 2001 .

[58]  P. Janmey,et al.  Mechanical properties of cytoskeletal polymers. , 1991, Current opinion in cell biology.

[59]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[60]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[61]  L. Silengo,et al.  Actin cytoskeleton organization in response to integrin‐mediated adhesion , 1999, Microscopy research and technique.

[62]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility , 1992 .

[63]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[64]  P. Gallagher,et al.  A fluorescent resonant energy transfer–based biosensor reveals transient and regional myosin light chain kinase activation in lamella and cleavage furrows , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[65]  Barry Koren,et al.  Numerical methods in fluid dynamics, initial and initial boundary-value problems , 1987, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae.