Difference between adolescent and collegiate baseball pitchers in the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs and trunk during pitching motion.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the differences between adolescent and collegiate baseball pitchers in the kinematic and kinetic profiles of the trunk and lower limbs during the pitching motion. The subjects were thirty-two adolescent baseball pitchers aged 12-15 years (APG) and thirty collegiate baseball pitchers aged 18-22 years (CPG). Three-dimensional motion analysis with a comprehensive lower-extremity model was used to evaluate kinematic and kinetic parameters during baseball pitching. The ground reaction forces (GRFs) of the pivot and stride legs during pitching were determined using two multicomponent force plates. The joint torques of hip, knee, and ankle were calculated by the inverse-dynamics computation of musculoskeletal human models using motion-capture data. To eliminate any effect of variation in body size, kinetic and GRFs data were normalized by dividing them by body mass. The velocity of a pitched ball was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in CPG (35.2 ± 1.9 m·s(-1)) than in the APG (30.7 ± 2.7 m·s(-1)). Most kinematic parameters for the lower limbs were similar between the CPG and the APG. Maximum Fy (toward the throwing direction) on the pivot leg and Fy and resultant forces on the stride leg at ball release were significantly greater in the CPG than in the APG (p < 0.05). Hip and knee joint torques on the lower limbs were significantly greater in the CPG than in the APG (p < 0.05). The present study indicates that the kinematics of lower limbs during baseball pitching are similar between adolescent and collegiate pitchers, but the momentum of the lower limbs during pitching is lower in adolescent pitchers than in collegiate ones, even when the difference in body mass is considered. Key pointsCollegiate baseball pitchers can generate the hip and knee joint torques on the pivot leg for accelerating the body forward.Collegiate baseball pitchers can generate the hip and knee joint torques to control/stabilize the stride leg in order to increase momentum on the stride leg during the arm acceleration phase.The kinematics of the lower limbs during baseball pitching are similar between adolescent and collegiate pitchers, but the momentum of the lower limbs during pitching is lower in adolescent pitchers than in collegiate ones, even when the difference in body mass is considered.Adolescent baseball pitchers cannot generate the hip and knee joint torques in the pivot and stride leg for transfer of the energy of trunk and the arm.

[1]  W. Kibler Specificity and sensitivity of the anterior slide test in throwing athletes with superior glenoid labral tears. , 1995, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  Matthew D Milewski,et al.  Adolescent baseball pitching technique: lower extremity biomechanical analysis. , 2012, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[3]  Hiroaki Kanehisa,et al.  Kinematic and Kinetic Profiles of Trunk and Lower Limbs during Baseball Pitching in Collegiate Pitchers. , 2014, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[4]  R F Escamilla,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Glenn S. Fleisig,et al.  Relationship of Pelvis and Upper Torso Kinematics to Pitched Baseball Velocity , 2001 .

[6]  S. Sakurai,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Cinematographic Analysis of Upper Limb Movement during Fastball and Curveball Baseball Pitches , 1993 .

[7]  G. Fleisig,et al.  Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison between Baseball Pitching and Football Passing , 1996 .

[8]  Kibler Wb Specificity and sensitivity of the anterior slide test in throwing athletes with superior glenoid labral tears. , 1995 .

[9]  W Ben Kibler,et al.  The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part I: pathoanatomy and biomechanics. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  T. Rowland,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Youth Baseball Pitches: Is the Curveball Potentially Harmful? , 2009 .

[11]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  Timing of the Lower Limb Drive and Throwing Limb Movement in Baseball Pitching , 1988 .

[13]  N. Zheng,et al.  Kinematic Comparisons of Throwing Different Types of Baseball Pitches , 1998 .

[14]  A. Atwater,et al.  BIOMECHANICS OF OVERARM THROWING MOVEMENTS AND OF THROWING INJURIES , 1979, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[15]  Yuichi Hirano,et al.  Effects of Non-throwing Arm on Trunk and Throwing Arm Movements in Baseball Pitching , 2004 .

[16]  G. Fleisig,et al.  Passive Ranges of Motion of the Hips and Their Relationship with Pitching Biomechanics and Ball Velocity in Professional Baseball Pitchers , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  J. Dapena,et al.  Dynamics of the shoulder and elbow joints of the throwing arm during a baseball pitch , 1986 .

[18]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Kinetic Comparison among the Fastball, Curveball, Change-up, and Slider in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Glenn S. Fleisig,et al.  Comparison of Kinematic and Temporal Parameters between Different Pitch Velocity Groups , 2001 .

[20]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Somatosensory computation for man-machine interface from motion-capture data and musculoskeletal human model , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[21]  Edmund Y. S. Chao,et al.  Characteristic Ground-Reaction Forces in Baseball Pitching , 1998 .

[22]  D. Stodden,et al.  Lower Extremity Muscle Activation During Baseball Pitching , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.