Mean Diffusional Kurtosis in Patients with Glioma: Initial Results with a Fast Imaging Method in a Clinical Setting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusional kurtosis imaging is an MR imaging technique that provides microstructural information in biologic systems. Its application in clinical studies, however, is hampered by long acquisition and postprocessing times. We evaluated a new and fast (2 minutes 46 seconds) diffusional kurtosis imaging method with regard to glioma grading, compared it with conventional diffusional kurtosis imaging, and compared the diagnostic accuracy of fast mean kurtosis (MK′) to that of the widely used mean diffusivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MK′ and mean diffusivity were measured in the contrast-enhancing tumor core, the perifocal hyperintensity (indicated on T2 FLAIR images), and the contralateral normal-appearing white and gray matter of 34 patients (22 with high-grade and 12 with low-grade gliomas). MK′ and mean diffusivity in the different tumor grades were compared by using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the areas under the curve were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MK′ and mean diffusivity. RESULTS: MK′ in the tumor core, but not mean diffusivity, differentiated high-grade from low-grade gliomas, and MK′ differentiated glioblastomas from the remaining gliomas with high accuracy (area under the curveMK′ = 0.842; PMK′ < .001). MK′ and mean diffusivity identified glioblastomas in the group of high-grade gliomas with similar significance and accuracy (area under the curveMK′ = 0.886; area under the curvemean diffusivity = 0.876; PMK′ = .003; Pmean diffusivity = .004). The mean MK′ in all tissue types was comparable to that obtained by conventional diffusional kurtosis imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The diffusional kurtosis imaging approach used here is considerably faster than conventional diffusional kurtosis imaging methods but yields comparable results. It can be accommodated in clinical protocols and enables exploration of the role of MK′ as a biomarker in determining glioma subtypes or response evaluation.

[1]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  Frederik De Smet,et al.  Branching morphogenesis and antiangiogenesis candidates: tip cells lead the way , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Helpern,et al.  Three‐dimensional characterization of non‐gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  M. F. Falangola,et al.  Preliminary observations of increased diffusional kurtosis in human brain following recent cerebral infarction , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  S. Maier,et al.  Diffusion imaging of brain tumors , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Michael H Lev,et al.  Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading. , 2012, Radiology.

[9]  J. Helpern,et al.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J K Smith,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Quantitative volumetric analysis of conventional MRI response in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[12]  Brian Hansen,et al.  Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean kurtosis , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Scott N. Hwang,et al.  Outcome prediction in patients with glioblastoma by using imaging, clinical, and genomic biomarkers: focus on the nonenhancing component of the tumor. , 2014, Radiology.

[14]  J. Sijbers,et al.  More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion kurtosis imaging , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Masaaki Hori,et al.  Visualizing non-Gaussian diffusion: clinical application of q-space imaging and diffusional kurtosis imaging of the brain and spine. , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[16]  Yu Wang,et al.  Validation of fast diffusion kurtosis MRI for imaging acute ischemia in a rodent model of stroke , 2014, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  Bradford A Moffat,et al.  Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Lagares,et al.  The Added Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Cerebral Blood Volume in the Preoperative Grading of Diffuse Gliomas , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  Sune Nørhøj Jespersen,et al.  Erratum: Hansen, Lund, Sangill, and Jespersen. Experimentally and Computationally Fast Method for Estimation of a Mean Kurtosis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 69:1754–1760 (2013) , 2014 .

[20]  E. Melhem,et al.  Diffusion kurtosis imaging: an emerging technique for evaluating the microstructural environment of the brain. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  A Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Diffusion and diffusion tensor imaging in brain cancer. , 2011, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[22]  T Taoka,et al.  Time Course of Axial and Radial Diffusion Kurtosis of White Matter Infarctions: Period of Pseudonormalization , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  Inas S. Khayal,et al.  Evaluation of diffusion parameters as early biomarkers of disease progression in glioblastoma multiforme. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  S. Crozier,et al.  Correlation of MRI-Derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Newly Diagnosed Gliomas with [18F]-Fluoro-L-Dopa PET: What Are We Really Measuring with Minimum ADC? , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.