Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: a controlled longitudinal study.

Walking and cycling is widely assumed to substitute for at least some motorized travel and thereby reduce energy use and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. While the evidence suggests that a supportive built environment may be needed to promote walking and cycling, it is unclear whether and how interventions in the built environment that attract walkers and cyclists may reduce transport CO2 emissions. Our aim was therefore to evaluate the effects of providing new infrastructure for walking and cycling on CO2 emissions from motorised travel. A cohort of 1849 adults completed questionnaires at baseline (2010) and one-year follow-up (2011), before and after the construction of new high-quality routes provided as part of the Sustrans Connect2 programme in three UK municipalities. A second cohort of 1510 adults completed questionnaires at baseline and two-year follow-up (2012). The participants reported their past-week travel behaviour and car characteristics from which CO2 emissions by mode and purpose were derived using methods described previously. A set of exposure measures of proximity to and use of the new routes were derived. Overall transport CO2 emissions decreased slightly over the study period, consistent with a secular trend in the case study regions. As found previously the new infrastructure was well used at one- and two-year follow-up, and was associated with population-level increases in walking, cycling and physical activity at two-year follow-up. However, these effects did not translate into sizeable CO2 effects as neither living near the infrastructure nor using it predicted changes in CO2 emissions from motorised travel, either overall or disaggregated by journey purpose. This lack of a discernible effect on travel CO2 emissions are consistent with an interpretation that some of those living nearer the infrastructure may simply have changed where they walked or cycled, while others may have walked or cycled more but few, if any, may have substituted active for motorised modes of travel as a result of the interventions. While the findings to date cannot exclude the possibility of small effects of the new routes on CO2 emissions, a more comprehensive approach of a higher 'dosage' of active travel promotion linked with policies targeted at mode shift away from private motorized transport (such as urban car restraint and parking pricing, car sharing/pooling for travel to work, integrating bike sharing into public transport system) may be needed to achieve the substantial CO2 savings needed to meet climate change mitigation and energy security goals.

[1]  S. K. Ribeiro Transport and its infrastructure , 2007 .

[2]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  T. Bridgeman,et al.  Distribution of carbon emissions in the UK : implications for domestic energy policy , 2013 .

[5]  Maria Saxe,et al.  Strategies for a road transport system based on renewable resources – The case of an import-independent Sweden in 2025 , 2010 .

[6]  Tim Straughan,et al.  NHS Information Centre , 2008 .

[7]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Explaining Changes in Walking and Bicycling Behavior: Challenges for Transportation Research , 2009 .

[8]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .

[9]  Anna Goodman,et al.  Who uses new walking and cycling infrastructure and how? Longitudinal results from the UK iConnect study , 2013, Preventive medicine.

[10]  Douglas Crawford-Brown,et al.  Short trips: An opportunity for reducing mobile-source emissions? , 2010 .

[11]  Alan Shiell,et al.  In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[12]  Anna Goodman,et al.  New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect Study. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[13]  Yena Song,et al.  Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study , 2012, BMJ Open.

[14]  F. Bull,et al.  An applied ecological framework for evaluating infrastructure to promote walking and cycling: the iConnect study. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[15]  B. Saelens,et al.  Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[16]  A Cope,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of evidence on the effects of investment in six Cycling Demonstration Towns , 2009 .

[17]  B. Giles-Corti People or places: what should be the target? , 2005, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[18]  L. Steg,et al.  Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change: opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[19]  O. Franco,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport , 2009, The Lancet.

[20]  Robin Lovelace,et al.  Assessing the energy implications of replacing car trips with bicycle trips in Sheffield, UK , 2011 .

[21]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[22]  Jens Troelsen,et al.  Evaluering af Odense - Danmarks Nationale Cykelby , 2004 .

[23]  J. Dargay The effect of prices and income on cartravel in the UK , 2007 .

[24]  D. Ogilvie,et al.  Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Grant Schofield,et al.  10,000 Steps Rockhampton : evaluation of a whole community approach to improving population levels of physical activity , 2006 .

[26]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers , 2009, The Lancet.

[27]  Anna Goodman,et al.  Associations of health, physical activity and weight status with motorised travel and transport carbon dioxide emissions: a cross-sectional, observational study , 2012, Environmental Health.

[28]  David R Bassett,et al.  Urban trails and physical activity: a natural experiment. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  Michael J. Greenwald,et al.  Carbonless footprints: promoting health and climate stabilization through active transportation. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[30]  K. Sælensminde COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES OF WALKING AND CYCLING TRACK NETWORKS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT INSECURITY, HEALTH EFFECTS AND EXTERNAL COSTS OF MOTORIZED TRAFFIC , 2004 .

[31]  Yena Song,et al.  Associations of individual, household and environmental characteristics with carbon dioxide emissions from motorised passenger travel , 2013, Applied energy.

[32]  Great Britain. Office for Standards in Education,et al.  Transport statistics, Great Britain , 1976 .

[33]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Benefits of shift from car to active transport , 2012 .