Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases (BTIP-BM).

A recent meeting was held on March 22, 2019, among the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), clinical scientists, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocacy groups to discuss challenges and potential solutions for increasing development of therapeutics for central nervous system (CNS) metastases. A key issue identified at this meeting was the need for consistent tumor measurement for reliable tumor response assessment, including the first step of standardized image acquisition with an MRI protocol that could be implemented in multicenter studies aimed at testing new therapeutics. This document builds upon previous consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) in high-grade gliomas and defines a protocol for brain metastases (BTIP-BM) that addresses unique challenges associated with assessment of CNS metastases. The "minimum standard" recommended pulse sequences include: 1) parameter matched pre- and post-contrast inversion-recovery (IR)-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (IR-GRE); 2) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquired after gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) injection and before post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images; 3) axial 2D or 3D T2-weighted FLAIR; 4) axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images; and 5) post-contrast 2D T1-weighted spin echo images for increased lesion conspicuity. Recommended sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5T and 3T MR systems. An "ideal" protocol is also provided, which replaces IR-GRE with 3D TSE T1-weighted imaging pre- and post-gadolinium, is best performed at 3T, and for which DSC perfusion is included. Recommended DSC perfusion parameters are given.

[1]  C. Brennan,et al.  18F-Fluorocholine PET uptake correlates with pathologic evidence of recurrent tumor after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  H. Baek,et al.  Usefulness of the Delay Alternating with Nutation for Tailored Excitation Pulse with T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolution in the Detection of Cerebral Metastases: Comparison with MPRAGE Imaging , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  E. Prodi,et al.  Brain Tumor-Enhancement Visualization and Morphometric Assessment: A Comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI Techniques , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  P. Wen,et al.  The RANO Leptomeningeal Metastasis Group proposal to assess response to treatment: lack of feasibility and clinical utility and a revised proposal. , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[5]  Ian Law,et al.  PET imaging in patients with brain metastasis-report of the RANO/PET group. , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[6]  J. Boxerman,et al.  Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low–Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  E. Winer,et al.  TBCRC 022: A Phase II Trial of Neratinib and Capecitabine for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Disorder in Pixel-Level Edge Directions on T1WI Is Associated with the Degree of Radiation Necrosis in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Preliminary Findings , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  Max Wintermark,et al.  FDG PET/MRI Coregistration Helps Predict Response to Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastases. , 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Shaw,et al.  Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  P. Huang,et al.  Distinguishing True Progression From Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases With Machine Learning and Radiomics. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J. Boxerman,et al.  Optimization of Acquisition and Analysis Methods for Clinical Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Using a Population-Based Digital Reference Object , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  Comparison of MRI and PET as Potential Surrogate Endpoints for Treatment Response After Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastasis. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  A. Shaw,et al.  Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  M. Atkins,et al.  Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Melanoma Metastatic to the Brain , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Combined FET PET/MRI radiomics differentiates radiation injury from recurrent brain metastasis , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[17]  M. Iv,et al.  Evaluation of Thick-Slab Overlapping MIP Images of Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted CUBE for Detection of Intracranial Metastases: A Pilot Study for Comparison of Lesion Detection, Interpretation Time, and Sensitivity with Nonoverlapping CUBE MIP, CUBE, and Inversion-Recovery-Prepared Fast-Spoiled G , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[18]  C. Sohn,et al.  Application of 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Patients with Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  P. Brown,et al.  Implications of Screening for Brain Metastases in Patients With Breast Cancer and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[20]  B. Zhao,et al.  Postcontrast T1 Mapping for Differential Diagnosis of Recurrence and Radionecrosis after Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  J. Wilmott,et al.  Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in melanoma brain metastases: a multicentre randomised phase 2 study. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  K. Nael,et al.  Interval Change in Diffusion and Perfusion MRI Parameters for the Assessment of Pseudoprogression in Cerebral Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiation. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Jung Hun Oh,et al.  Early posttreatment assessment of MRI perfusion biomarkers can predict long-term response of lung cancer brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  Y. Tao,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Amino Acid and FDG-PET in Differentiating Brain Metastasis Recurrence from Radionecrosis after Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[25]  Whitney B Pope,et al.  Brain metastases: neuroimaging. , 2018, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[26]  K. Blackwell,et al.  Biopsy of enlarging lesions after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases frequently reveals radiation necrosis , 2017, Neuro-oncology.

[27]  N. Tomura,et al.  Differentiation between Treatment-Induced Necrosis and Recurrent Tumors in Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparison among 11C-Methionine-PET, FDG-PET, MR Permeability Imaging, and MRI-ADC—Preliminary Results , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[28]  J. Buckner,et al.  Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  P. Brown,et al.  Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: An Update of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA) , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[30]  Lijun Ma,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues. , 2017, Neuro-Oncology.

[31]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Immunotherapy in melanoma: Recent advances and future directions. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[32]  J. Boxerman,et al.  Effects of MRI Protocol Parameters, Preload Injection Dose, Fractionation Strategies, and Leakage Correction Algorithms on the Fidelity of Dynamic-Susceptibility Contrast MRI Estimates of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in Gliomas , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[33]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Radiation injury versus malignancy after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: impact of time-dependent changes in lesion morphology on MRI , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[34]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[35]  P. Wen,et al.  Leptomeningeal metastases: a RANO proposal for response criteria , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[36]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET imaging for the detection of checkpoint inhibitor-related pseudoprogression in melanoma brain metastases. , 2016, Neuro-Oncology.

[37]  Mauricio Castillo,et al.  Use of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging (SWI) in the Detection of Brain Hemorrhagic Metastases from Breast Cancer and Melanoma , 2016, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[38]  J. Sheehan,et al.  Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases: a prospective validation of diagnostic yield , 2016, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[39]  Eudocia Q Lee,et al.  Updates in the management of brain metastases. , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[40]  Volker W Stieber,et al.  Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[41]  H. Kluger,et al.  Does immunotherapy increase the rate of radiation necrosis after radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases? , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[42]  K. Kim,et al.  The detectability of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced spin-echo or gradient-echo images: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[43]  M. Schulder,et al.  Time-delayed contrast-enhanced MRI improves detection of brain metastases and apparent treatment volumes. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[44]  A. Sahgal,et al.  The predictive capacity of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in response assessment of brain metastases following radiation , 2016, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[45]  Takashi Abe,et al.  Comparison of Brain Tumor Contrast-enhancement on T1-CUBE and 3D-SPGR Images. , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[46]  E. Kasper,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of PET, SPECT, and Arterial Spin-Labeling in Differentiating Tumor Recurrence from Necrosis in Cerebral Metastasis after Stereotactic Radiosurgery , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[47]  E. Tanghe,et al.  Analysis of eddy currents induced by transverse and longitudinal gradient coils in different tungsten collimators geometries for SPECT/MRI integration , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  Naoya Hashimoto,et al.  Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology: a report of the RANO working group. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[49]  Marion Smits,et al.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[50]  J. Weichet,et al.  The Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study) , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[51]  Yoshiya Yamada,et al.  Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases , 2015, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[52]  Martin Bendszus,et al.  Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[53]  M. McDermott,et al.  Adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: incidence, time course, and risk factors. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[54]  David F Kallmes,et al.  Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. , 2015, Radiology.

[55]  Y. Shoshan,et al.  Delayed contrast extravasation MRI: a new paradigm in neuro-oncology. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[56]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  Which is the best advanced MR imaging protocol for predicting recurrent metastatic brain tumor following gamma-knife radiosurgery: focused on perfusion method , 2015, Neuroradiology.

[57]  O. Dietrich,et al.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced modified T1-weighted 3D TSE black-blood and 3D MP-RAGE sequences for the detection of cerebral metastases and brain tumours , 2015, European Radiology.

[58]  M. Wintermark,et al.  Application of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to predict the intracranial metastatic tumor response to gamma knife radiosurgery , 2014, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[59]  John P Mugler,et al.  Optimized three‐dimensional fast‐spin‐echo MRI , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[60]  M. Pinho,et al.  Assessment of irradiated brain metastases using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2014, Neuroradiology.

[61]  A. Vortmeyer,et al.  Significance of histology in determining management of lesions regrowing after radiosurgery , 2014, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[62]  W. Moon,et al.  Effect of Imaging Time in the Magnetic Resonance Detection of Intracerebral Metastases Using Single Dose Gadobutrol , 2014, Korean journal of radiology.

[63]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  18F-FDOPA PET for Differentiating Recurrent or Progressive Brain Metastatic Tumors from Late or Delayed Radiation Injury After Radiation Treatment , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  J. Flickinger,et al.  Extent of perilesional edema differentiates radionecrosis from tumor recurrence following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[65]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 2: neurocognitive, neurological, and quality-of-life outcomes. A report from the RANO group. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[66]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 1: patient population, response, and progression. A report from the RANO group. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[67]  Fernando Calamante,et al.  The 39 steps: evading error and deciphering the secrets for accurate dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[68]  J. Heidenreich,et al.  Quantitative contrast ratio comparison between T1 (TSE at 1.5T, FLAIR at 3T), magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo and subtraction imaging at 1.5T and 3T. , 2013, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[69]  K. Stelzer,et al.  Epidemiology and prognosis of brain metastases , 2013, Surgical neurology international.

[70]  Ulrike I Attenberger,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced 3-Dimensional SPACE Versus MP-RAGE for the Detection of Brain Metastases: Considerations With a 32-Channel Head Coil , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[71]  Tatsuya Ohno,et al.  Usefulness of double dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for clear delineation of gross tumor volume in stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning of metastatic brain tumors: a dose comparison study , 2012, Journal of radiation research.

[72]  R. Floris,et al.  Cerebral neoplastic enhancing lesions: multicenter, randomized, crossover intraindividual comparison between gadobutrol (1.0M) and gadoterate meglumine (0.5M) at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg body weight in a clinical setting. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[73]  K. Takakura,et al.  Differentiation of tumor progression and radiation-induced effects after intracranial radiosurgery. , 2013, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[74]  D. Nass,et al.  Delayed Contrast Extravasation MRI for Depicting Tumor and Non-Tumoral Tissues in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors , 2012, PloS one.

[75]  H. Abujudeh,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[76]  O. Chinot,et al.  Recent trends in epidemiology of brain metastases: an overview. , 2012, Anticancer research.

[77]  H. Herzog,et al.  Role of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET for Differentiation of Local Recurrent Brain Metastasis from Radiation Necrosis , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[78]  J. Villano,et al.  Toward determining the lifetime occurrence of metastatic brain tumors estimated from 2007 United States cancer incidence data. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[79]  G. Barnett,et al.  Conventional MRI does not reliably distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[80]  Eung Yeop Kim,et al.  Detection of Small Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparison of 3D Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Brain Black-Blood Imaging and MP-RAGE Imaging , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[81]  Xianghua Luo,et al.  Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[82]  P. Wen,et al.  Epidemiology of Brain Metastases , 2012, Current Oncology Reports.

[83]  J. Knisely,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of MR Imaging Changes following Radiosurgery to 500 Brain Metastases , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[84]  D. Schellingerhout,et al.  Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted FLAIR and fast spin-echo MRI of the spine at 3 T for evaluation of extradural lesions. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[85]  Y. Inaba,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Brain Metastases From Systemic Malignances With Two Doses of Gadobutrol 1.0 M Compared With Gadoteridol: A Multicenter, Phase II/III Study in Patients With Known or Suspected Brain Metastases , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[86]  K. Yamashita,et al.  3D Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence with Motion-Sensitized Driven-Equilibrium Preparation for Detection of Brain Metastases on 3T MR Imaging , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[87]  A. Khandji,et al.  Review of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and management of brain metastases. , 2011, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[88]  F. Barkhof,et al.  The Holy Grail in diagnostic neuroradiology: 3T or 3D? , 2010, European Radiology.

[89]  S. Lee,et al.  Diagnostic Yield of Double-Dose Gadobutrol in the Detection of Brain Metastasis: Intraindividual Comparison with Double-Dose Gadopentetate Dimeglumine , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[90]  T. Hirai,et al.  Comparison of the Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo Sequences in Relation to Conventional Postcontrast T1-Weighted Images for the Evaluation of Leptomeningeal Diseases at 3T , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[91]  B. Hamm,et al.  Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Linear and Volumetric Measurements of Brain Metastases Using Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[92]  M. Endo,et al.  Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors from radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[93]  R. Scotti,et al.  Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[94]  T. Tominaga,et al.  Differential diagnosis between radiation necrosis and glioma progression using sequential proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and methionine positron emission tomography. , 2009, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[95]  O. Al-saeed,et al.  T1‐weighted fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery and T1‐weighted fast spin‐echo contrast‐enhanced imaging: A comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions , 2009, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[96]  S. Higano,et al.  Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts by Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions in Detection of Small Brain Metastasis at 3T MR Imaging: Comparison with Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo Imaging , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[97]  D. Knol,et al.  Radiological progression of cerebral metastases after radiosurgery: assessment of perfusion MRI for differentiating between necrosis and recurrence , 2009, Journal of Neurology.

[98]  M R Segal,et al.  Distinguishing Recurrent Intra-Axial Metastatic Tumor from Radiation Necrosis Following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Using Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[99]  T. Nagaoka,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D mp-rage) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[100]  W. Friedman,et al.  CAN STANDARD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING RELIABLY DISTINGUISH RECURRENT TUMOR FROM RADIATION NECROSIS AFTER RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES? A RADIOGRAPHIC‐PATHOLOGICAL STUDY , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[101]  Juan Alvarez-Linera,et al.  3T MRI: advances in brain imaging. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[102]  Pieter Leffers,et al.  Detection of brain metastases from small cell lung cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[103]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[104]  M. Harada,et al.  Difference in Enhancement Between Spin Echo and 3-Dimensional Fast Spoiled Gradient Recalled Acquisition in Steady State Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Metastasis at 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[105]  S. Plotkin,et al.  Brain metastases , 2008, Current treatment options in neurology.

[106]  H. Abe,et al.  Metastatic adenocarcinoma in the brain: magnetic resonance imaging with pathological correlations to mucin content. , 2008, Anticancer research.

[107]  E. Merkle,et al.  A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[108]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Detection of brain metastasis at 3T: comparison among SE, IR-FSE and 3D-GRE sequences , 2007, European Radiology.

[109]  J. Knisely,et al.  Prognostic factors for survival after stereotactic radiosurgery vary with the number of cerebral metastases , 2007, Cancer.

[110]  Jerrold L Boxerman,et al.  Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting the outcome of Gamma Knife-treated brain metastases prior to changes in tumor volume: a preliminary study. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[111]  T. Hirai,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histologic type and tumor cellularity. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[112]  P. Cornu,et al.  EFNS Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases: report of an EFNS Task Force , 2006, European journal of neurology.

[113]  C. Vecht,et al.  Therapeutic management of brain metastasis , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[114]  R. Soffietti,et al.  Radiotherapy and chemotherapy of brain metastases , 2005, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[115]  M. Taphoorn,et al.  Symptomatic management and imaging of brain metastases , 2005, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[116]  M. Ando,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnoses of brain metastases of lung cancer. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[117]  Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[118]  T. Nakada,et al.  Evaluation of the response of metastatic brain tumors to stereotactic radiosurgery by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 201TlCl single-photon emission computerized tomography, and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[119]  Y. Olsson,et al.  Hematogenous metastases of the human brain – Characteristics of peritumoral brain changes: A review , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[120]  Armin Thron,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Compared to CCT in Patients with Brain Metastases , 2004, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[121]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Effect of Contrast Dose and Field Strength in the Magnetic Resonance Detection of Brain Metastases , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[122]  T. Araki,et al.  T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery at low field strength: a viable alternative for T1-weighted intracranial imaging. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[123]  M. Van Cauteren,et al.  Effect of Intravenous Gadolinium-DTPA on Diffusion-Weighted Images: Evaluation of Normal Brain and Infarcts , 2002, Stroke.

[124]  C. Matula,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Enhancement of Brain Tumors at 3 Tesla Versus 1.5 Tesla , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[125]  G. Sze,et al.  Comparison of single- and triple-dose contrast material in the MR screening of brain metastases. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[126]  A. Elster How much contrast is enough? Dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequence , 1997, European Radiology.

[127]  K. Krabbe,et al.  MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[128]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Gd-enhanced MR imaging of brain metastases: contrast as a function of dose and lesion size. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[129]  M. Hartmann,et al.  MR enhancement of brain lesions: increased contrast dose compared with magnetization transfer. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[130]  W. Hall,et al.  Brain metastases: Histology, multiplicity, surgery, and survival , 1996 .

[131]  E. Larsson,et al.  Brain Metastases — Comparison of Gadodiamide Injection-Enhanced MR Imaging at Standard and High Dose, Contrast-Enhanced CT and Non-Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging , 1995, Acta radiologica.

[132]  W. Yuh,et al.  The effect of contrast dose, imaging time, and lesion size in the MR detection of intracerebral metastasis. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[133]  E. Shaw,et al.  Brain metastatic lesions. , 1994, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[134]  W. Yuh,et al.  Phase III multicenter trial of high-dose gadoteridol in MR evaluation of brain metastases. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[135]  J. Ehrhardt,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of high-dose MR contrast studies in the evaluation of brain metastases. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[136]  M. Mawad,et al.  Metastatic adenocarcinoma to the brain: MR with pathologic correlation. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[137]  G. Glover,et al.  Comparison of lesion enhancement on spin-echo and gradient-echo images. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[138]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Triple-dose versus standard-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: a randomized study in 199 patients. , 1993, Radiology.

[139]  T. Hilbertz,et al.  Administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging of intracranial tumors: dosage and field strength. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[140]  M. Modic,et al.  MR imaging of metastatic GI adenocarcinoma in brain. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[141]  V. Runge,et al.  High‐dose gadoteridol in MR imaging of intracranial neoplasms , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[142]  J. Ehrhardt,et al.  Experience with high-dose gadolinium MR imaging in the evaluation of brain metastases. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[143]  V. Runge,et al.  High‐dose applications of gadolinium chelates in magnetic resonance imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[144]  W. Schörner,et al.  Dosing of Gd‐DTPA in MR imaging of intracranial tumors , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[145]  P. Hudgins,et al.  Diagnosis of cerebral metastases: double-dose delayed CT vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[146]  L. Heier,et al.  Detection of brain metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR with unenhanced MR and enhanced CT. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[147]  G. Krol,et al.  Distribution of brain metastases. , 1988, Archives of neurology.

[148]  M. Norusis,et al.  Multiple cerebral metastases: detectability with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[149]  G. Press,et al.  Increased detection of intracranial metastases with intravenous Gd-DTPA. , 1987, Radiology.

[150]  V. Vaitkevicius,et al.  Malignant melanoma and central nervous system metastases. Incidence, diagnosis, treatment and survival , 1978, Cancer.

[151]  T. Mandybur Intracranial hemorrhage caused by metastatic tumors , 1977, Neurology.