Canine small bowel transplantation. A study of the immunological responses.

A canine small bowel allograft model was used to determine the effects of radiation to the graft in modifying the immunological effects of the passenger leukocytes. When untreated allografts were transplanted, death of the recipient animals occurred at a mean of nine days. The allograft was well-preserved and showed no signs of rejection. The reasons for attributing death to graft-versus-host (GVH) disease are discussed. When allografts were treated with 150 rads prior to transplantation, allograft rejection occurred, with death of the recipient animals at a mean of 9.2 days. This was the only group in which cell-mediated immunity developed. When allografts were treated with 50 rads, prolonged survival of the recipients to a mean of 28 days was noted. It is postulated that in this group a balance was struck between the allograft rejection reaction and GVH disease, with prolongation of allograft survival.

[1]  H. Bitter-Suermann Induction of lethal graft versus host disease in rats by spleen grafting. , 1974, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  L. Toledo-Pereyra,et al.  Prolonged survival of canine orthotopic small intestinal allografts preserved for 24 hours by hypothermic bloodless perfusion. , 1974, Surgery.

[3]  Guttmann Rd,et al.  The effect of recipient thymectomy on rat cardiac allograft rejection. , 1974 .

[4]  W. Lapp,et al.  EFFECT OF LYMPHOID TISSUE TRANSPLANTS ON THE INTENSITY OF AN EXISTING GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST REACTION , 1974, Transplantation.

[5]  L. Toledo-Pereyra,et al.  Role of exdotoxin and bacteria in long-term survival of preserved small-bowel allografts. , 1974, Surgery.

[6]  D. R. Wilson,et al.  Assessment of the cellular immune response to HL-A antigens in human renal allograft recipients. , 1973, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[7]  E. Diener,et al.  Liver infiltration in graft-versus-host reaction. Effect of anti-theta serum. , 1972, Transplantation.

[8]  R. Tigelaar,et al.  SYNERGY AMONG LYMPHOID CELLS MEDIATING THE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST RESPONSE , 1972, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  H. Cantor,et al.  Synergy among lymphoid cells mediating the graft-versus-host response. 3. Evidence for interaction between two types of thymus-derived cells. , 1972, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  L. Schultz,et al.  Problems in absorption and immunosuppression after entire intestinal allotransplantation. , 1972, American journal of surgery.

[11]  P. Russell,et al.  Transplantation of small bowel in the rat: technical and immunological considerations. , 1971, Surgery.

[12]  G. Warden,et al.  Prolonged survival of rat heart and kidney allografts irradiated in vitro. , 1971, Transplantation.

[13]  G. Möller Suppressive effect of graft versus host reactions on the immune response to heterologous red cells. , 1971, Immunology.

[14]  D. Steinmuller,et al.  Passenger leukocytes and induction of allograft immunity. , 1971, Transplantation proceedings.

[15]  J. Gómez-Acebo,et al.  Homotransplant of the small intestine and the graft-versus-host reaction. , 1970, Revue europeenne d'etudes cliniques et biologiques. European journal of clinical and biological research.

[16]  R. Guttmann,et al.  RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN THE INBRED RAT: XI. Reduction of Allograft Immunogenioity by Cytotoxic Drug Pretreatment of Donors , 1969, Transplantation.

[17]  W. Lapp,et al.  Prolonged survival of H-2 incompatible skin allografts on F1 animals treated with parental lymphoid cells. , 1969, Immunology.

[18]  G. O. Bain,et al.  Liver infiltration in the graft-versus-host reaction. , 1969, Transplantation.

[19]  M. Simonsen,et al.  THE PROPERTY OF “STRENGTH” OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS, AND THEIR ABILITY TO PRODUCE ANTIGENIC COMPETITION , 1967, Transplantation.

[20]  Preston Fw,et al.  Survival of homografts of the intestine with and without immunosuppression. , 1966 .

[21]  V. Kočandrle,et al.  Regeneration of the lymphatics after autotransplantation and homotransplantation of the entire small intestine. , 1966, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[22]  R. Good,et al.  AN ASSAY OF GRAFT-HOST INTERACTIONS ACROSS STRONG AND WEAK HISTOCOMPATIBILITY BARRIERS IN MICE , 1963, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  M. Simonsen Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. , 1962, Progress in allergy.