Research Paper: Electronic Health Records in Specialty Care: A Time-Motion Study

BACKGROUND Electronic health records (EHRs) have great potential to improve safety, quality, and efficiency in medicine. However, adoption has been slow, and a key concern has been that clinicians will require more time to complete their work using EHRs. Most previous studies addressing this issue have been done in primary care. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of using an EHR on specialists' time. DESIGN Prospective, before-after trial of the impact of an EHR on attending physician time in four specialty clinics at an integrated delivery system: cardiology, dermatology, endocrine, and pain. MEASUREMENTS We used a time-motion method to measure physician time spent in one of 85 designated activities. RESULTS Attending physicians were monitored before and after the switch from paper records to a web-based ambulatory EHR. Across all specialties, 15 physicians were observed treating 157 patients while still using paper-based records, and 15 physicians were observed treating 146 patients after adoption. Following EHR implementation, the average adjusted total time spent per patient across all specialties increased slightly but not significantly (Delta = 0.94 min., p = 0.83) from 28.8 (SE = 3.6) to 29.8 (SE = 3.6) min. CONCLUSION These data suggest that implementation of an EHR had little effect on overall visit time in specialty clinics.

[1]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System: Letter Report , 2004 .

[3]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Center for Information Technology Leadership , 2003 .

[4]  H. Bauchner,et al.  Use of an electronic medical record improves the quality of urban pediatric primary care. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[5]  J. Corrigan,et al.  COMMITTEE ON DATA STANDARDS FOR PATIENT SAFETY , 2004 .

[6]  C. Delpierre,et al.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[7]  David W. Bates,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Health Care IT Collaboration in Massachusetts: The Experience of Creating Regional Connectivity , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  David W. Bates,et al.  Physicians And Ambulatory Electronic Health Records U.S. physicians are ready to make the transition to EHRs—which is clearly overdue, given the rest of the world's experience. , 2005 .

[9]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  C. McDonald,et al.  A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Charles Safran,et al.  Electronic Medical Records: A Decade of Experience , 2001 .

[12]  D. Simel,et al.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. , 1994, Health services research.

[13]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Using information systems to measure and improve quality , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Jennifer S. Haas,et al.  Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  C Safran.  msJAMA. Electronic medical records: a decade of experience. , 2001, JAMA.

[17]  D. Brailer.  Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. , 2005, Health affairs.

[18]  W. Hersh.  Medical informatics: improving health care through information. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Research Paper: Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine Practices , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  P. Maurette.  [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[21]  Ida Sim,et al.  Electronic Medical Records: Lessons from Small Physician Practices , 2003 .

[22]  P. Diggle.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[23]  David W. Bates,et al.  Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: A time-motion study , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[25]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[26]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  Moving toward a United States strategic plan in primary care informatics: a White Paper of the Primary Care Informatics Working Group, American Medical Informatics Association. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[27]  B. Middel.  The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review1) , 2008 .

[28]  David Grembowski,et al.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[29]  D. Bates.  Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. , 2005, Health affairs.

[30]  P W DeBry.  Considerations for choosing an electronic medical record for an ophthalmology practice. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[31]  R. Baron,et al.  Electronic Health Records: Just around the Corner? Or over the Cliff? , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  R. Grol,et al.  Work satisfaction of general practitioners and the quality of patient care. , 1985, Family practice.