Vessel TRIAGE: A method for assessing and communicating the safety status of vessels in maritime distress situations

Efficient response to maritime incidents and accidents requires good communication processes and situation awareness by all involved parties, in particular between the Search and Rescue (SAR) response operators and the crew of the distressed vessel. In this paper, a method is proposed for enhancing the communication between the involved parties, by focusing on the safety status of the vessel. Borrowing ideas from well-established working methods in especially emergency medicine, the Vessel TRIAGE method has been established through a broad stakeholder consultation process. Its intended application is to assess and communicate whether a vessel can provide a safe environment for the people onboard. Using a set of threat factors and a four-level ship safety categorization, the method aims to establish a shared understanding of the nature of the distress situation, which in turn has implications for the operational focus of the SAR operators and vessel crew. An evaluation of the proposed method indicates a positive reception among various maritime stakeholders, suggesting that implementing the Vessel TRIAGE method in maritime SAR procedures may act as a useful tool to assist in the management of maritime distress situations.

[1]  Thomas Lübcke,et al.  Intuition or deliberation - How do professionals make decisions in action? , 2015, ISCRAM.

[2]  J. Shanteau How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? , 1992 .

[3]  James S. Hodges,et al.  Six (Or So) Things You Can Do with a Bad Model , 1991, Oper. Res..

[4]  J. Z. Bonilla Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal , 2010 .

[5]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management , 2015 .

[6]  G. Klein,et al.  A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. , 1993 .

[7]  J. Shanteue COMPETENCE IN EXPERTS: THE ROLE OF TASK CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[8]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Philosophical roots of model validation: Two paradigms , 1990 .

[9]  Jinxian Weng,et al.  Investigation of shipping accident injury severity and mortality. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Kerrie L. Mengersen,et al.  A proposed validation framework for expert elicited Bayesian Networks , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  I. van der Wulp,et al.  Reliability and validity of emergency department triage systems , 2010 .

[12]  Oyvind Breivik,et al.  An operational search and rescue model for the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea , 2011, 1111.1102.

[13]  Sharon Scrofine,et al.  Triage: the sorting of patients. , 2014, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[14]  James S. Hodges,et al.  Is It You or Your Model Talking?: A Framework for Model Validation , 1992 .

[15]  Andrzej Jasionowski Decision Support for Crisis Management and Emergency Response , 2010 .

[16]  Yusuf Volkan Aydogdu,et al.  A Comparison of Maritime Risk Perception and Accident Statistics in the Istanbul Straight , 2014 .

[17]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Tsz Leung Yip,et al.  Determinants of injuries in passenger vessel accidents. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Ulf Paulsson,et al.  A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Osiris A. Valdez Banda,et al.  A risk analysis of winter navigation in Finnish sea areas. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Risk analysis in maritime transportation : principles, frameworks and evaluation , 2015 .

[22]  Primiano Iannone,et al.  A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  Erland Wilske,et al.  e-Navigation and situation-dependent manoeuvring assistance to enhance maritime emergency response , 2011 .

[24]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart , 1999 .

[25]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Exploring the context of maritime SAR missions using visual data mining techniques , 2015 .

[26]  Pekka Ruponen,et al.  Validation of a simulation method for progressive flooding , 2007 .

[27]  Bekir Sahin,et al.  A Root Cause Analysis for Arctic Marine Accidents from 1993 to 2011 , 2015 .

[28]  J Wang,et al.  An analysis of fishing vessel accidents. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Jean Craig,et al.  A validation study of 5 triage systems using data from the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, chlorine spill. , 2014, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[30]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Developing information systems to support situational awareness and interaction in time-pressuring crisis situations , 2014 .

[31]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Analyses and Implications of Accidents in Singapore Strait , 2012 .

[32]  Ji Ho Ryu,et al.  Characteristics and triage of a maritime disaster: an accidental passenger ship collision in Korea , 2010, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[33]  Irène Abi-Zeid,et al.  SARPlan: A decision support system for Canadian Search and Rescue Operations , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..