Sharing knowledge: contextualising socio‐technical thinking and practice

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to present the empirical findings from a case study in knowledge sharing with the aim of understanding knowledge sharing in a strategic context through a socio‐technical approach. Design/methodology/approach – Knowledge sharing facilitators and barriers were examined in a UK owned multinational engineering organisation. A total of 20 semi‐structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a combination of matrix and template analysis. Findings – The paper highlights leadership, organisational, and individual factors that are perceived to impact knowledge sharing. Furthermore, three sub‐factors: trust, individual motivation and geographical location, are discussed as double‐edged factors, i.e. their impact on knowledge sharing is complex in that they may act as both barriers and enablers. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation of this study is that it is conducted in a single organisational context. A second case study is currently being analysed to explore knowledge sharing in a different context within the same organisation. Practical implications – A balanced approach to knowledge management practices is emphasised where both technical and social aspects are taken into account. Originality/value – This paper provides important contributions. First, it emphasises the impact of strategic change on knowledge sharing as one aspect of the organisational knowledge management. Second, it frames knowledge sharing within a socio‐technical approach. Third, it provides us with empirical evidence through our use of case study in an organisational setting.

[1]  Peter J. Sloane,et al.  SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS , 2006 .

[2]  Albert Cherns,et al.  Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted , 1987 .

[3]  Nigel King,et al.  Using templates in the thematic analysis of text , 2004 .

[4]  Robert J. Jensen,et al.  Presumptive Adaptation and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .

[5]  Annick Willem,et al.  Effects of Organizational Design Dimensions on Inter-unit Knowledge Sharing , 2006 .

[6]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[8]  Elisabeth Brauner,et al.  Beyond knowledge sharing: the management of transactive knowledge systems , 2006 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  Kristian Kreiner,et al.  Tacit knowledge management: the role of artifacts , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Tools and Methods to Support the Design and Implementation of New Work Systems , 2008 .

[12]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Transferring R&D Knowledge : the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success , 2003 .

[13]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[14]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work , 1995 .

[15]  C W Clegg,et al.  Sociotechnical principles for system design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  S. Debowski.  Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[17]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[18]  Jennifer Bates Averill,et al.  Matrix Analysis as a Complementary Analytic Strategy in Qualitative Inquiry , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[19]  Jürgen Kluge,et al.  Knowledge Unplugged: The McKinsey and Company Global Survey on Knowledge Management , 2001 .

[20]  M. P. Kerr.  A Socio-Technical Approach To Knowledge Capture, Sharing And Reuse In Aerospace Design , 2001 .

[21]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆ , 2000 .

[22]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  The Principles of Sociotechnical Design , 1976 .

[24]  Karl M. Wiig,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[26]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[27]  Ryan W. Quinn.  Flow in Knowledge Work: High Performance Experience in the Design of National Security Technology , 2005 .