Controlling ac losses in quantum Hall effect devices

When measured with ac at kilohertz frequencies the quantized Hall resistance (QHR) of a quantum Hall effect (QHE) device is usually found to be current- and frequency-dependent. This is a limitation on its use as a quantum impedance standard. We develop a model for the principal ac losses arising in the QHE device and show how they are responsible for the observed QHR current and frequency coefficients. We believe that losses are mainly caused by dissipative ac charging of the device along its edges. Charging is induced by the passage of the Hall current and by capacitive coupling between an edge and any nearby conductor maintained at an ac potential different to that of the edge, as for example at shield potential. The loss power is proportional to frequency and increases more rapidly than the square of the applied voltage or current. We model losses in terms of in-phase loss currents, which are a function of the amplitude of the ac charge reaching or leaving edges. The QHR frequency coefficient is zero only when the loss current for one portion of the high-potential edge and that for a corresponding portion of the low-potential edge are equal and of opposite sign. We propose a simple method for approaching that balance condition: gates are located under the device edges and their ac potentials adjusted so that the QHR current coefficient, evaluated at a constant frequency, is zero. We report measurements of the residual QHR frequency coefficients obtained after adjustment for GaAs/GaAlAs devices of two different types. For five different devices of the most favourable type, the QHR frequency coefficients do not exceed ±2 parts in 108 per kilohertz.

[1]  J. Melcher,et al.  Comparison of precision AC and DC measurements with the quantized Hall resistance , 1993 .

[2]  Higgins,et al.  Capacitance measurements of a quantized two-dimensional electron gas in the regime of the quantum Hall effect. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[3]  M. E. Cage,et al.  Intrinsic Capacitances and Inductances of Quantum Hall Effect Devices , 1996, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[4]  Luca Callegaro,et al.  Measurements of the ac longitudinal resistance of a GaAs-AlGaAs quantum Hall device , 1999, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[5]  P. Vasek,et al.  AC QHE-based calibration of resistance standards , 1996 .

[6]  F. Delahaye,et al.  Accurate AC Measurements of the Quantized Hall Resistance from 1 Hz to 1,6 kHz , 1995 .

[7]  F. Delahaye,et al.  Technical Guidelines for Reliable Measurements of the Quantized Hall Resistance , 1989 .

[8]  F. Delahaye,et al.  Series and parallel connection of multiterminal quantum Hall‐effect devices , 1993 .

[9]  H. Shtrikman,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR BULK CURRENT IN HALL BAR SAMPLES AND POTENTIAL SCREENING IN THE INTEGER QUANTUM HALL EFFECT , 1998 .

[10]  F. Delahaye,et al.  Accurate AC measurements of standard resistors between 1 and 20 Hz , 1993 .

[11]  François Piquemal,et al.  AC measurements of the minimum longitudinal resistance of a QHE sample from 10 Hz to 10 kHz , 1996 .

[12]  F. Piquemal,et al.  Report on a joint BIPM-EUROMET project for the fabrication of QHE samples by the LEP , 1993 .

[13]  Barry M. Wood,et al.  Improved AC quantized Hall measurements , 1999, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[14]  Inductive probing of the integer quantum Hall effect. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[15]  Bernd Schumacher,et al.  Fabrication of quantum Hall devices for low magnetic fields , 1998, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[16]  Sze Wey Chua,et al.  Measurement of the ac quantized Hall resistance , 1999, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..