Active Flow Control of Separation in a Branched Duct

Regulation of flow diversion from a primary rectangular channel into a branched secondary duct having an inlet section that spans one of the channel walls is investigated experimentally (Mo ≤ 0.4) using active flow control. The flow distribution between ducts is effected by controlling the inherent separation at the upstream edge of the compact secondary duct inlet using an integrated spanwise array of fluidic oscillating jets. The primary and secondary flows are characterized in the absence and presence of actuation using surface pressure distributions, Mach number mapping, and particle image velocimetry. It is shown that the fluidic actuation can regulate the increase in diverted mass flow rate by more than 50%. Furthermore, the mass flow rate through the primary channel increases by up to 25% due to associated reduction in losses at the entrance to the secondary duct. Analysis of the flow field in the vicinity of the separation using proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) indicates that the actuation significantly alters its incipient dynamics. As the magnitude of the actuation increases, the energy content of the dominant POD modes near separation is enhanced as manifested by the increase in the characteristic scale of the vorticity concentrations. These changes suggest that the present actuation is dissipative and therefore limits fine-scale dynamics.

[1]  Michael Amitay,et al.  Separation Control in Duct Flows , 2002 .

[2]  Roger L. Simpson,et al.  Turbulent Boundary-Layer Separation , 1989 .

[3]  K. Blanckaert Flow separation at convex banks in open channels , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  L. Sirovich TURBULENCE AND THE DYNAMICS OF COHERENT STRUCTURES PART I : COHERENT STRUCTURES , 2016 .

[5]  M. Amitay,et al.  Flow Control in a Diffuser at Transonic Conditions , 2015 .

[6]  Melissa A. Green,et al.  Detection and tracking of vortex phenomena using Lagrangian coherent structures , 2015 .

[7]  Ari Glezer,et al.  Development of an extended proper orthogonal decomposition and its application to a time periodically forced plane mixing layer , 1989 .

[8]  L. Graftieaux,et al.  Combining PIV, POD and vortex identification algorithms for the study of unsteady turbulent swirling flows , 2001 .

[9]  M. Nishi,et al.  Control of Separation in a Conical Diffuser by Vortex Generator Jets. , 1998 .

[10]  A. Glezer,et al.  Investigation of Trapped Vorticity Concentrations Effected by Hybrid Actuation in an Offset Diffuser , 2016 .

[11]  William Yang,et al.  Experimental investigation of dilute turbulent particulate flow inside a curved 90° bend , 2006 .

[12]  Andrzej Banaszuk,et al.  Adaptive Control of Flow Separation in a Planar Diffuser , 2003 .

[13]  M. V. Otugen,et al.  Separating and Reattaching Flow Structure in a Suddenly Expanding Rectangular Duct , 1995 .

[14]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[15]  A. Glezer,et al.  Active Shock Control in a Transonic Flow , 2013 .

[16]  H. Sung,et al.  Control of turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing step by local forcing , 1996 .

[17]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Vortex shedding in a two-dimensional diffuser: theory and simulation of separation control by periodic mass injection , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Shinnosuke Obi,et al.  Organized vortex motion in periodically perturbed turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing step , 2001 .

[19]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Perturbed Free Shear Layers , 1984 .

[20]  Bojan Vukasinovic,et al.  Dissipative small-scale actuation of a turbulent shear layer , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Steady flow separation patterns in a 45 degree junction , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Y. Elimelech,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation on steady blowing flow control within a compact inlet duct , 2015 .