Improved signal processing approaches in an offline simulation of a hybrid brain–computer interface

In a conventional brain-computer interface (BCI) system, users perform mental tasks that yield specific patterns of brain activity. A pattern recognition system determines which brain activity pattern a user is producing and thereby infers the user's mental task, allowing users to send messages or commands through brain activity alone. Unfortunately, despite extensive research to improve classification accuracy, BCIs almost always exhibit errors, which are sometimes so severe that effective communication is impossible. We recently introduced a new idea to improve accuracy, especially for users with poor performance. In an offline simulation of a "hybrid" BCI, subjects performed two mental tasks independently and then simultaneously. This hybrid BCI could use two different types of brain signals common in BCIs - event-related desynchronization (ERD) and steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs). This study suggested that such a hybrid BCI is feasible. Here, we re-analyzed the data from our initial study. We explored eight different signal processing methods that aimed to improve classification and further assess both the causes and the extent of the benefits of the hybrid condition. Most analyses showed that the improved methods described here yielded a statistically significant improvement over our initial study. Some of these improvements could be relevant to conventional BCIs as well. Moreover, the number of illiterates could be reduced with the hybrid condition. Results are also discussed in terms of dual task interference and relevance to protocol design in hybrid BCIs.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Bohorquez,et al.  Neuromonitoring of cochlea and auditory nerve with multiple extracted parameters during induced hypoxia and nerve manipulation , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfacing for Intelligent Systems , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[5]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[6]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Harmonic coupling of steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects , 2007, Expert review of medical devices.

[8]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[9]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Classification of movement-related EEG in a memorized delay task experiment , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  N Birbaumer,et al.  A binary spelling interface with random errors. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  The Hybrid BCI , 2010, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[15]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Visualization of significant ERD/ERS patterns in multichannel EEG and ECoG data , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  K. Jellinger Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2009 .

[17]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Self-initiation of EEG-based brain-computer communication using the heart rate response. , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Graz brain-computer interface II: towards communication between humans and computers based on online classification of three different EEG patterns , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  J.R. Wolpaw,et al.  A $\mu $-Rhythm Matched Filter for Continuous Control of a Brain-Computer Interface , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  J. Summers,et al.  Neural correlates of performance trade-offs and dual-task interference in bimanual coordination: An ERP investigation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based brain computer interface (BCI). Search for optimal electrode positions and frequency components. , 1995, Medical progress through technology.

[24]  José del R. Millán,et al.  An Introduction to Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2007 .

[25]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[27]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Comparison of DFT and lock-in amplifier features and search for optimal electrode positions in SSVEP-based BCI , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Noninvasive brain-actuated control of a mobile robot by human EEG , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[30]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Could the beta rebound in the EEG be suitable to realize a “brain switch”? , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Self-Paced Operation of an SSVEP-Based Orthosis With and Without an Imagery-Based “Brain Switch:” A Feasibility Study Towards a Hybrid BCI , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[32]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Analysis of sensorimotor rhythms for the implementation of a brain switch for healthy subjects , 2010, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[33]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Toward a hybrid brain–computer interface based on imagined movement and visual attention , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[34]  E Donchin,et al.  Resource reciprocity: an event-related brain potentials analysis. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[35]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[36]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing revisited. , 1984, Psychological review.

[37]  C D Wickens,et al.  The dynamics of P300 during dual-task performance. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[38]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[40]  J. Summers,et al.  The behavioural and electrophysiological effects of visual task difficulty and bimanual coordination mode during dual-task performance , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[42]  S. Martens,et al.  Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[43]  Karla Felix Navarro,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Brain Interface Technology Designs , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.