Assistive Technology and Mathematics: What is There and Where Can We Go in Special Education

Technology is a natural part of education for all students across a variety of subjects, including mathematics, as educators work to prepare students for tomorrow's work force and align their curriculum and teaching with national standards such those developed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM, 2000). This article reviews the literature on mathematics, assistive technology (AT), and educating students with high-incidence disabilities in grades K-12 from 1996 through 2007. The results of the literature review revealed three main areas of AT in mathematics for students with disabilities: anchored instruction, computer-assisted instruction, and calculators. The review focuses on what has been done and suggests that we do know some things in terms of effective AT and mathematics education (i.e., anchored instruction). It then discusses where the field needs to go to improve its knowledge base (i.e., researching AT currently used in the teaching and learning of mathematics, and researching recent innovations in mathematics technology).

[1]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Number Combination Skill in At-Risk First Graders , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Mary Heinrichs,et al.  Weighing the Benefits of Anchored Math Instruction for Students with Disabilities in General Education Classes , 2002 .

[3]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Can Computers Teach Problem-Solving Strategies to Students with Mild Mental Retardation? , 1997 .

[4]  Paula Maccini,et al.  Mathematics Instructional Practices and Assessment Accommodations by Secondary Special and General Educators , 2006 .

[5]  T. Hasselbring,et al.  Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. , 2000, The Future of children.

[6]  Craig A. Michaels,et al.  Assistive Technology Integration in Special Education Teacher Preparation: Program Coordinators' Perceptions of Current Attainment and Importance , 2003 .

[7]  John F. Cawley,et al.  Seeking Excellence in Mathematics Education for Student with Mild Disabilities , 1992 .

[8]  B. Elbaum,et al.  Effects of an Oral Testing Accommodation on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 2007 .

[9]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  State Policies on Assessment Participation and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities , 2005 .

[10]  Qing Li.  Infusing technology into a mathematics methods course: any impact? , 2005 .

[11]  John F. Cawley,et al.  Cross-Sectional Comparisons of the Mathematical Performance of Children with Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[12]  Robert D. Hannafin,et al.  Using Web-Based Computer Games to Meet the Demands of Today’s High-Stakes Testing , 2003 .

[13]  John F. Cawley,et al.  Arithmetic Computation Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities: Implications for Curriculum. , 1998 .

[14]  Paula Maccini,et al.  Best Practices for Teaching Mathematics to Secondary Students with Special Needs , 2000 .

[15]  Herbert J. Rieth,et al.  A Retrospective View of Computer-Based Instruction , 1993 .

[16]  Emily C. Bouck,et al.  Does it Add Up? Calculators as Accommodations for Sixth Grade Students with Disabilities , 2008 .

[17]  G. W. Beers,et al.  The effect of teaching method on objective test scores: problem-based learning versus lecture. , 2005, The Journal of nursing education.

[18]  M. Montague,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Mathematics Reform for Students with LD , 2002 .

[19]  Ronald C. Serlin,et al.  Shrinking Achievement Differences With Anchored Math Problems , 2007 .

[20]  R. Dods,et al.  An Action Research Study of the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Promoting the Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge , 1997 .

[21]  Joseph Calvin Gagnon,et al.  Mathematics Instruction in Secondary Interim, Short- and Long-Term Alternative School Placements , 2006 .

[22]  John F. Cawley,et al.  Arithmetic Performance of Students: Implications for Standards and Programming , 2001 .

[23]  Sandra Callis Bethell,et al.  From an E To an A in First-Year Algebra with the Help of a Graphing Calculator. , 1998 .

[24]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  The impact of home computer use on children's activities and development. , 2000, The Future of children.

[25]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Assisted Versus Teacher-Directed Instruction on the Multiplication Performance of Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  Ted S. Hasselbring,et al.  Developing Math Automaticity in Learning Handicapped Children: The Role of Computerized Drill and Practice. , 1988 .

[27]  Brian A. Bottge,et al.  Effects of Contextualized Math Instruction on Problem Solving of Average and Below-Average Achieving Students , 1999 .

[28]  John Woodward.  Redoing the Numbers , 1999 .

[29]  Juliet A. Baxter,et al.  Rules and Reasons: Decimal Instruction for Academically Low Achieving Students , 1999 .

[30]  John Woodward,et al.  Uses of Technology for Mathematics Assessment and Instruction: Reflection on a Decade of Innovations , 1993 .

[31]  Evan M. Glazer.  K-12 Mathematics and the Web , 2004 .

[32]  Stephen B. Dunbar,et al.  Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria , 1991 .

[33]  L. Berkson.  Problem‐based learning: have the expectations been met? , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[34]  Cynthia M. Okolo,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction Format and Initial Attitude on the Arithmetic Facts Proficiency and Continuing Motivation of Students with Learning Disabilities. , 1992 .

[35]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  When researchers swim upstream: reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media , 1991 .

[36]  Rena B. Lewis,et al.  Assistive Technology and Learning Disabilities , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[37]  Elizabeth A. Watson,et al.  Effects of Video-Based and Applied Problems on the Procedural Math Skills of Average- and Low-Achieving Adolescents , 2003 .

[38]  Brian A. Bottge,et al.  Situating Math Instruction in Rich Problem-Solving Contexts: Effects on Adolescents with Challenging Behaviors , 2006 .

[39]  Kathleen A. McGee,et al.  Enabling or Disabling? Observations on Changes in Special Education , 2004 .

[40]  Cheryl Irish,et al.  Using Peg- and Keyword Mnemonics and Computer-Assisted Instruction to Enhance Basic Multiplication Performance in Elementary Students with Learning and Cognitive Disabilities , 2002 .

[41]  John Woodward,et al.  Mathematics Education in the United States , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[42]  B. Bottge,et al.  A Comparison of Two Approaches for Teaching Complex, Authentic Mathematics Problems to Adolescents in Remedial Math Classes , 1993, Exceptional children.

[43]  Marley W. Watkins,et al.  Computerized Drill-and-Practice and Academic Attitudes of Learning Disabled Students , 1989 .

[44]  Ronald C. Serlin,et al.  Anchoring Adolescents' Understanding of Math Concepts in Rich Problem-Solving Environments , 2001 .

[45]  R. Quinn.  Technology: Preservice Teachers' Beliefs and the Influence of a Mathematics Methods Course , 1998 .

[46]  Gail Fitzgerald,et al.  Empirical Advances in Technology-Assisted Instruction for Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities. , 1996 .