Structurally and Functionally Optimized Silk‐Fibroin–Gelatin Scaffold Using 3D Printing to Repair Cartilage Injury In Vitro and In Vivo

Articular cartilage repair remains a great challenge for clinicians and researchers. Recently, there emerges a promising way to achieve one-step cartilage repair in situ by combining endogenic bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) with suitable biomaterials using a tissue engineering technique. To meet the increasing demand for cartilage tissue engineering, a structurally and functionally optimized scaffold is designed, by integrating silk fibroin with gelatin in combination with BMSC-specific-affinity peptide using 3D printing (3DP) technology. The combination ratio of silk fibroin and gelatin greatly balances the mechanical properties and degradation rate to match the newly formed cartilage. This dually optimized scaffold has shown superior performance for cartilage repair in a knee joint because it not only retains adequate BMSCs, due to efficient recruiting ability, and acts as a physical barrier for blood clots, but also provides a mechanical protection before neocartilage formation and a suitable 3D microenvironment for BMSC proliferation, differentiation, and extracellular matrix production. It appears to be a promising biomaterial for knee cartilage repair and is worthy of further investigation in large animal studies and preclinical applications. Beyond knee cartilage, this dually optimized scaffold may also serve as an ideal biomaterial for the regeneration of other joint cartilages.

[1]  Jerry C. Hu,et al.  Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[2]  Y. Chan,et al.  A novel, minimally-invasive technique of cartilage repair in the human knee using arthroscopic microfracture and injections of mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronic acid--a prospective comparative study on safety and short-term efficacy. , 2012, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[3]  S. Kundu,et al.  Silk proteins for biomedical applications: Bioengineering perspectives , 2014 .

[4]  Deok‐Ho Kim,et al.  Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink , 2014, Nature Communications.

[5]  Hai Yao,et al.  Regeneration of the articular surface of the rabbit synovial joint by cell homing: a proof of concept study , 2010, The Lancet.

[6]  Yingqian Wang,et al.  A Difunctional Regeneration Scaffold for Knee Repair based on Aptamer‐Directed Cell Recruitment , 2017, Advanced materials.

[7]  Dietmar W. Hutmacher,et al.  A Tissue Engineering Solution for Segmental Defect Regeneration in Load-Bearing Long Bones , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  Xin Zhang,et al.  The effects of co-delivery of BMSC-affinity peptide and rhTGF-β1 from coaxial electrospun scaffolds on chondrogenic differentiation. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[9]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk fibroin biomaterials for controlled release drug delivery , 2011, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[10]  Xin Zhang,et al.  A composite scaffold of MSC affinity peptide-modified demineralized bone matrix particles and chitosan hydrogel for cartilage regeneration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Kang Zhang,et al.  3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2016, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[12]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials , 2015 .

[13]  Xin Zhang,et al.  One-Step Repair for Cartilage Defects in a Rabbit Model , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  S. Kimber,et al.  Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells toward chondrocytes , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  B. Min,et al.  Using Cartilage Extracellular Matrix (CECM) Membrane to Enhance the Reparability of the Bone Marrow Stimulation Technique for Articular Cartilage Defect in Canine Model , 2012 .

[16]  Wenxue Jiang,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional printing and vacuum freeze-dried techniques for fabricating composite scaffolds. , 2016, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  Jeffrey M Karp,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell homing: the devil is in the details. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[18]  L. Pruitt,et al.  Nanoindentation differentiates tissue-scale functional properties of native articular cartilage. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Silk based bioinks for soft tissue reconstruction using 3-dimensional (3D) printing with in vitro and in vivo assessments. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[20]  Ung-Jin Kim,et al.  In vitro cartilage tissue engineering with 3D porous aqueous-derived silk scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[21]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  Xin Zhang,et al.  A functional biphasic biomaterial homing mesenchymal stem cells for in vivo cartilage regeneration. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[23]  Jerry C. Hu,et al.  Unlike Bone, Cartilage Regeneration Remains Elusive , 2012, Science.

[24]  X. Bian,et al.  Chondrogenic regeneration using bone marrow clots and a porous polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite scaffold by three-dimensional printing. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[25]  Ta-Jen Huang,et al.  Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  Joseph M. Mansour,et al.  Mesenchymal Cell-Based Repair of Large Full Thickness Defects of Articular Cartilage , 1994 .

[27]  J A Skinner,et al.  A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. , 2006, The Knee.

[28]  R. Reis,et al.  Genipin-modified silk-fibroin nanometric nets. , 2008, Macromolecular bioscience.

[29]  F. Barry,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells in joint disease and repair , 2013, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[30]  Zhenyu Tang,et al.  Mechano growth factor (MGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β3 functionalized silk scaffolds enhance articular hyaline cartilage regeneration in rabbit model. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[31]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Syndecans in cartilage breakdown and synovial inflammation , 2013, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[32]  M. Göken,et al.  Mechanical properties of hyaline and repair cartilage studied by nanoindentation. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[33]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Directing chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells with a solid-supported chitosan thermogel for cartilage tissue engineering , 2014, Biomedical materials.

[34]  A. Hollander,et al.  Human nasal cartilage responds to oncostatin M in combination with interleukin 1 or tumour necrosis factor α by the release of collagen fragments via collagenases , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[35]  H. Fan,et al.  Ultrasonication and Genipin Cross-Linking to Prepare Novel Silk Fibroin–Gelatin Composite Hydrogel , 2012 .

[36]  R. Reis,et al.  Novel genipin-cross-linked chitosan/silk fibroin sponges for cartilage engineering strategies. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[37]  R. Spontak,et al.  Effect of beta-sheet crystals on the thermal and rheological behavior of protein-based hydrogels derived from gelatin and silk fibroin. , 2005, Macromolecular bioscience.

[38]  Xiaoyang Mou,et al.  Tissue Regeneration: A Silk Road , 2016, Journal of functional biomaterials.