Application of the local maximum synchrosqueezing transform for seismic data

Abstract Seismic signal analysis is the main step in data processing through the petroleum exploration via costly seismic investigations. Precision of target delineation by seismic data for exploratory drilling strongly depends on resolution of the seismic image. However, resolution of the seismic image is restricted by the band-limited nature of the seismic signal and inherent deficiencies in signal enhancement and random noise attenuation methods. Generally, it is required to increase resolution of the seismic data both in time and frequency domains. General solution to achieve this goal is employing time – frequency transformation (TFT) methods. The most applicable and conventional TFT method is the short time Fourier transform (STFT). Nevertheless, the STFT method does not provide sufficient resolution for further seismological interpretation on data. Thus, reassignment and simultaneous synchrosqueezing transform methods were introduced that increase resolution in time by reassignment of coefficients to their true position. However, they are still not appropriate for obtaining required resolution in seismic signal. The local maximum synchrosqueezing transform (LMSST) was introduced as an efficient method for signal analysis. The LMSST method yet was not used for analysis of seismic data and the procedure of its parameters optimization for applying on seismic data is unclear. Therefore, in the presented study, we propose a strategy for defining optimum parameters of the LMSST method and the procedure of its application on seismic data, where high resolution seismic image is required for hydrocarbon exploration. The proposed strategy was applied on two synthetic data examples, considering the quality factor expression and contamination by random noise and a field data example from a natural gas reservoir. Result of applying the proposed strategy on synthetic and field data examples and comparison of results with the leading-edge methods, revealed that this strategy could be considered as an alternative to the common signal enhancement methods. Additionally, the proposed method consists of the advantage of easy implementation and full reconstruction of the original signal. It was also proved that the proposed strategy is a robust method against added random noise compared to other competitive methods when applied on nonstationary seismic signal.

[1]  Yandong Li,et al.  High-frequency anomalies in carbonate reservoir characterization using spectral decomposition , 2011 .

[2]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Adaptive singular spectrum analysis for seismic denoising and interpolation , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[3]  Alireza Ahmadifard,et al.  Sparse time-frequency representation for seismic noise reduction using low-rank and sparse decomposition , 2016 .

[4]  Yatong Zhou,et al.  Empirical Low-Rank Approximation for Seismic Noise Attenuation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Abolghasem Kamkar Rouhani,et al.  Seismic resolution enhancement using scale transform in the time-frequency domain , 2018, GEOPHYSICS.

[6]  Liu Fangyu,et al.  Hydrocarbon detection for cavern carbonate reservoir using low-and-high-frequency anomalies in spectral decomposition , 2012 .

[7]  Gang Yu,et al.  General linear chirplet transform , 2016 .

[8]  Ljubisa Stankovic,et al.  Synchrosqueezing-based time-frequency analysis of multivariate data , 2015, Signal Process..

[9]  Deva Prasad Ghosh,et al.  Seismic imaging of complex structures with the CO-CDS stack method , 2016, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica.

[10]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  A Class of Multivariate Denoising Algorithms Based on Synchrosqueezing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Hamid Reza Siahkoohi,et al.  Ground roll noise attenuation by local time-frequency transform , 2011 .

[12]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Seismic Random Noise Attenuation Using Sparse Low-Rank Estimation of the Signal in the Time–Frequency Domain , 2019, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  M. Soleimani Naturally fractured hydrocarbon reservoir simulation by elastic fracture modeling , 2017, Petroleum Science.

[14]  Gang Yu,et al.  Multisynchrosqueezing Transform , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Wei Liu,et al.  A Novel Approach for Seismic Time-Frequency Analysis Based on High-Order Synchrosqueezing Transform , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[16]  P. Anno,et al.  Spectral decomposition of seismic data with continuous-wavelet transform , 2005 .

[17]  Mehrdad Soleimani,et al.  Well performance optimization for gas lift operation in a heterogeneous reservoir by fine zonation and different well type integration , 2017 .

[18]  Hongrui Cao,et al.  An improvement of time-reassigned synchrosqueezing transform algorithm and its application in mechanical fault diagnosis , 2020 .

[19]  Fangyu Li,et al.  Seismic spectral decomposition using deconvolutive short-time Fourier transform spectrogram , 2013 .

[20]  Liguo Han,et al.  Spectral decomposition and de‐noising via time‐frequency and space‐wavenumber reassignment , 2014 .

[21]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Emd via mEMD: multivariate noise-Aided Computation of Standard EMD , 2013, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[22]  Sylvain Meignen,et al.  Time-Frequency Reassignment and Synchrosqueezing: An Overview , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[23]  Thomas M. Daley,et al.  Seismic low-frequency effects in monitoring fluid-saturated reservoirs , 2004 .

[24]  H. Aghajani,et al.  Salt dome boundary detection in seismic image via resolution enhancement by the improved NFG method , 2018, Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica.

[25]  Y. Rao,et al.  Seismic low-frequency amplitude analysis for identifying gas reservoirs within thinly layered media , 2020 .

[26]  Hui Li,et al.  Synchroextracting transform: The theory analysis and comparisons with the synchrosqueezing transform , 2020, Signal Process..

[27]  D. P. Mandic,et al.  Multivariate empirical mode decomposition , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Deconvolutive Short-Time Fourier Transform Spectrogram , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[29]  Zhen Li,et al.  Local maximum synchrosqueezing transform: An energy-concentrated time-frequency analysis tool , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[30]  John,et al.  Instantaneous spectral analysis : Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons , 2022 .

[31]  Shibin Wang,et al.  Time-reassigned synchrosqueezing transform: The algorithm and its applications in mechanical signal processing , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[32]  G. Goloshubin,et al.  Seismic modeling of low-frequency “shadows” beneath gas reservoirs , 2014 .

[33]  François Auger,et al.  Time-Frequency Reassignment: From Principles to Algorithms , 2018, Applications in Time-Frequency Signal Processing.

[34]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Empirical Mode Decomposition-Based Time-Frequency Analysis of Multivariate Signals: The Power of Adaptive Data Analysis , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[35]  Mokhtar Mohammadi,et al.  Seismic Random Noise Attenuation Using Synchrosqueezed Wavelet Transform and Low-Rank Signal Matrix Approximation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  H. R. Siahkoohi,et al.  Random Noise Suppression from Seismic Data Using Time-frequency Peak Filtering , 2009 .

[37]  Hongbo Lin,et al.  Random denoising and signal nonlinearity approach by time-frequency peak filtering using weighted frequency reassignment , 2013 .

[38]  Mengbo Zhang,et al.  Seismic forward and inverse simulation in a tight reservoir model of loess plateau region , 2017 .

[39]  Mehrdad Soleimani,et al.  Automatic salt dome detection in seismic data by combination of attribute analysis on CRS images and IGU map delineation , 2018, Journal of Applied Geophysics.

[40]  C. Robert Pinnegar,et al.  The S-transform with windows of arbitrary and varying shape , 2003 .

[41]  Qingtang Jiang,et al.  Adaptive Short-time Fourier Transform and Synchrosqueezing Transform for Non-stationary Signal Separation , 2018, Signal Process..

[42]  Shibin Wang,et al.  Matching synchrosqueezing transform: A useful tool for characterizing signals with fast varying instantaneous frequency and application to machine fault diagnosis , 2018 .

[43]  Yueyang Li,et al.  Time-Reassigned Multisynchrosqueezing Transform for Bearing Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[44]  Sylvain Meignen,et al.  High-Order Synchrosqueezing Transform for Multicomponent Signals Analysis—With an Application to Gravitational-Wave Signal , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[45]  Junxing Cao,et al.  Detection of gas and water using HHT by analyzing P- and S-wave attenuation in tight sandstone gas reservoirs , 2013 .

[46]  M. Sacchi,et al.  Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis , 2011 .

[47]  Alireza Ahmadifard,et al.  Synchrosqueezing-based Transform and its Application in Seismic Data Analysis , 2015 .

[48]  Hamid Hassanpour,et al.  Using a time-frequency distribution to identify buried channels in reflection seismic data , 2016, Digit. Signal Process..

[49]  Gang Yu,et al.  Synchroextracting Transform , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.