Making Use of Foresight to Capture the Co-Evolution of Security Technologies and Societal Development

The following contribution focuses on the question of how emerging security technologies might influence the way people live in the future. Rapidly evolving security technologies come with new opportunities for the security sector on the one hand, but on the other lead to new threats related to privacy and a potential lack of democratic control. Using a foresight approach based on the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries, this paper offers a new approach to consider emerging technologies in the field of public security and reflect their potential impacts on society in Germany. By using storytelling in scenarios, a methodological approach is offered to capture potential future developments and make them accessible in a broader negotiation process about the pros and cons of implementing new security technologies. Referring to the concept of “security culture”, means ideas, norms, and practices of individuals and organizations about why and how security technologies will be implemented in understandable and comprehensible pictures of public security in Germany in the next ten to fifteen years. Those possible scenarios were developed based on data from qualitative content analyses of tech publications and policy papers that focus on emerging security technologies. With this foresight approach, it is possible to provide insight into the impact of security technology and initiate a reflection on current trends.

[1]  Andrew D. Selbst,et al.  Big Data's Disparate Impact , 2016 .

[2]  L. Gerhold,et al.  What Computer Scientists Can Learn From Social Scientists : On the Significance of an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Shaping Digitalization and its Social Implications , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS).

[3]  Lars Ostermeier Der Staat in der prognostischen Sicherheitsgesellschaft , 2018 .

[4]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  What’s new about the “new surveillance”?: Classifying for change and continuity , 2004 .

[5]  Aaron Shapiro,et al.  Reform predictive policing , 2017, Nature.

[6]  Heiko A. Gracht,et al.  A Delphi-based risk analysis — Identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment , 2013 .

[7]  Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al.  Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products , 2019, AIES.

[8]  L. Gerhold,et al.  Security culture 2030. How security experts assess the future state of privatization, surveillance, security technologies and risk awareness in Germany , 2017 .

[9]  Rafael Popper,et al.  Mapping Foresight: Revealing how Europe and other world regions navigate into the future , 2009 .

[10]  James Stewart,et al.  The co-evolution of society and multimedia technology: issues in predicting the future innovation and use of a ubiquitous technology , 1998 .

[11]  Stefan Kaufmann,et al.  Security Through Technology? Logic, Ambivalence and Paradoxes of Technologised Security , 2016 .

[12]  L. Gerhold,et al.  Risk perception and emergency food preparedness in Germany , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[13]  Lucas D. Introna,et al.  Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition Systems , 2002, Surveillance & Society.

[14]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea , 2009 .

[15]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF SOUTH WALES POLICE’S USE OF AUTOMATED FACIAL RECOGNITION , 2018 .

[16]  Kim Sune Karrasch Jepsen Imaginaries of Modernity: STS and Topographies of Power , 2017 .

[17]  Noah McClain,et al.  The horizons of technological control: automated surveillance in the New York subway , 2018 .