Education and risk of breast cancer in the Norwegian‐Swedish women's lifestyle and health cohort study

A positive relationship between level of education and female breast cancer risk is well supported by scientific evidence, but few previous studies could adjust for all relevant potential confounding factors. The authors' purpose was to examine how risk for breast cancer varies with level of education and to identify factors that explain this variation, using data from a prospective cohort study including 102,860 women from Norway and Sweden who responded to an extensive questionnaire in 1991/1992; 1,090 incident primary invasive breast cancer cases were revealed during follow‐up, which ended in December 1999. The Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Women with more than 16 years of education had a 36% increased risk compared to the lowest educated (7–9 years) (Age adjusted RR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.68). This relationship was slightly stronger among postmenopausal (RR 1.51) than among premenopausal (RR 1.25) women. In both groups, however, the relative risk estimates turned close to unity by adjustment for parity, age at first birth, body mass index (BMI), height, age at menarche, menopausal status, use of oral contraceptives and consumption of alcohol. The overall multivariate relative risk among the highest educated women was 1.04 (95% CI 0.82–1.32). The results of our study suggest a clear positive gradient in risk for breast cancer by level of education, which can be fully explained by established breast cancer risk factors. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Dufour,et al.  Epidemiology. Introduction. , 1995, Recent developments in alcoholism : an official publication of the American Medical Society on Alcoholism, the Research Society on Alcoholism, and the National Council on Alcoholism.

[2]  Ø. Kravdal The High Fertility of College Educated Women in Norway: An Artefact of the 'Piecemeal Approach' , 2001 .

[3]  J R Marshall,et al.  Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  E. Lynge,et al.  Occupational cancer in Denmark. Cancer incidence in the 1970 census population. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[5]  J. Mission,et al.  Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology , 2004 .

[6]  L. Brinton,et al.  A prospective study of reproductive, familial and socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer using NHANES I data. , 1989, Public health reports.

[7]  R S Paffenbarger,et al.  Characteristics that predict risk of breast cancer before and after the menopause. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  Breast Cancer Incidence before Age 55 in Relation to Parity and Age at First and Last Births: A Prospective Study of One Million Norwegian Women , 1994, Epidemiology.

[9]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Social factors, diet and breast cancer in a northern Italian population. , 1984, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  F. Speizer,et al.  Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Socioeconomic status, migration and the risk of breast cancer in Italy. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[12]  K. Gorey,et al.  Association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Toronto, Ontario: possible confounding of cancer mortality by incidence and survival. , 1998, Cancer prevention & control : CPC = Prevention & controle en cancerologie : PCC.

[13]  R. Goldbohm,et al.  Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence: a prospective cohort study. , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  M. Ewertz,et al.  Risk of breast cancer in relation to social factors in Denmark. , 1988, Acta oncologica.

[15]  W. Wright,et al.  Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups , 2001, Cancer Causes & Control.

[16]  H. Adami,et al.  Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[17]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Level of education, use of oral contraceptives and reproductive factors: the Tromsø Study. , 1990, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  R. Goldbohm,et al.  Differences in Cancer Incidence and Mortality Among Socio-Economic Groups , 1995, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[19]  A Morabia,et al.  Misclassification bias related to definition of menopausal status in case-control studies of breast cancer. , 1992, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  G. Costa,et al.  Cancer risk and social inequalities in Italy. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[21]  J. Horm,et al.  Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among blacks and whites. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  W. Mackillop,et al.  Associations between community income and cancer incidence in Canada and the United States , 2000, Cancer.

[23]  T. Lappegård New fertility trends in Norway , 2000 .

[24]  R. Williams,et al.  Association of cancer sites with tobacco and alcohol consumption and socioeconomic status of patients: interview study from the Third National Cancer Survey. , 1977, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  K. Heck,et al.  Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  C. Willie,et al.  Sociology in medicine. , 1961, New York state journal of medicine.

[27]  S. Devesa,et al.  Association of breast cancer and cervical cancer incidence with income and education among whites and blacks. , 1980, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  W. Willett,et al.  Menstrual factors in relation to breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[29]  A. Lunde,et al.  The person-number systems of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Israel. , 1980, Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research.

[30]  N. Krieger,et al.  Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, black, Hispanic, and white residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 (United States) , 1999, Cancer Causes & Control.

[31]  P. Peeters,et al.  Early age at menopause and breast cancer: are leaner women more protected? A prospective analysis of the Dutch DOM cohort , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[32]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Attributable risks for breast cancer in Italy: Education, family history and reproductive and hormonal factors , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[33]  R. Goldbohm,et al.  Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease , 2001, The Lancet.

[34]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  Associations of cancer site and type with occupation and industry from the Third National Cancer Survey Interview. , 1977, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  Ivar Heuch,et al.  A prospective study of reproductive factors and breast cancer. II. Age at first and last birth. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[36]  A. Maguire,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer in Brazil. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[37]  H. Gobbi,et al.  A case-control study of risk factors for breast cancer in Brazil, 1978-1987. , 1995, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  A. Jemal,et al.  Social inequalities and cancer. , 1997, IARC scientific publications.

[39]  R. Gofin,et al.  Indicators of social class. A comparative appraisal of measures for use in epidemiological studies. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[40]  D. Torgerson Risk factors for breast cancer , 1994, BMJ.