THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PROCESSES AFFECTING RECRUITMENT OF TWO TEMPERATE REEF FISHES

Local population densities of most benthic marine organisms are determined by a variety of processes that act before, during, and after settlement of planktonic propagules to the benthos. Considerable disagreement exists over the relative contribution of each process to patterns of abundance. Using multifactorial experiments, I assessed the effects of resident conspecifics, potential interspecific competitors, predators, and reef location on patterns of recruitment of two temperate reef fishes. Recruitment of bluebanded gobies (Lythrypnus dalli) and blackeye gobies (Coryphopterus nicholsii) consistently increased with distance from a nearby large reef. Recruitment of Lythrypnus was enhanced by the presence of older resident conspecifics. I found no strong evidence of any competitive effects between the two species. Predators had a variety of important effects on the density of recruits. Recruitment of Lythrypnus was halved by predators; this was the result of direct and indirect effects of predators: in addition to directly reducing recruit density, predators also reduced recruitment indirectly by reducing the density of older residents to which recruits responded. I developed two related methods for quantifying the contributions of the direct and indirect components of the predator effect. The effect of predation was spatially variable for both species: the net effect of this variability was the elimination of recruitment patterns related to reef location. Hence, the effects of spatially variable input of recruits was dependent upon the presence of predators, and thereby, predation altered the relative importance of the other factors that affected recruitment of the gobies. I argue that a much broader understanding of the “relative importance” of multiple causal processes will be gained by striving to understand how the contribution of each process is modified by other processes than by attempting to quantify the “importance” of each process.

[1]  C. S. Holling.  The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[2]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[3]  Daniel J. Miller.  Miller and Lea's Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California. , 1972, Ichthyology & Herpetology.

[4]  J. Wiley.  Life History Of The Western North American Goby Coryphopterus-Nicholsii , 1973 .

[5]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .

[6]  P. Sale.  The effect of territorial adult pomacentrid fishes on the recruitment and survival of juveniles on patches of coral rubble , 1976 .

[7]  J. Wiley.  Life histories and systematics of the western North American gobies Lythrypnus dalli (Gilbert) and Lythrypnus zebra (Gilbert) , 1976 .

[8]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[9]  R. Larson.  Competition, Habitat Selection, and the Bathymetric Segregation of Two Rockfish (Sebastes) Species , 1980 .

[10]  M. Hixon.  COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CALIFORNIA REEF FISHES OF THE GENUS EMBIOTOCA , 1980 .

[11]  P. Doherty.  Some effects of density on the juveniles of two species of tropical, territorial damselfish , 1982 .

[12]  P. Doherty.  Coral reef fishes : recruitment-limited assemblages? , 1982 .

[13]  H. Sweatman.  Influence of conspecifics on choice of settlement sites by larvae of two pomacentrid fishes (Dascyllus aruanus and D. reticulatus) on coral reefs , 1983 .

[14]  B. Victor.  Recruitment and Population Dynamics of a Coral Reef Fish , 1983, Science.

[15]  P. Doherty.  Tropical Territorial Damselfishses: Is Density Limited by Aggression or Recruitment? , 1983 .

[16]  James F. Quinn,et al.  On Hypothesis Testing in Ecology and Evolution , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[17]  J. Ogden,et al.  Priority Effects in the Recruitment of Juvenile Coral Reef Fishes , 1983 .

[18]  H. Sweatman.  The influence of adults of some coral reef fishes on larval recruitment , 1985 .

[19]  Myra J. Shulman.  Variability in recruitment of coral reef fishes , 1985 .

[20]  Myra J. Shulman.  Recruitment of Coral Reef Fishes: Effects of Distribution of Predators and Shelter , 1985 .

[21]  J. Connell.  The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities , 1985 .

[22]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments , 1985 .

[23]  D. R. Robertson,et al.  Interference Compoetition Structures Habitat Use in a Local Assemblage of Coral Reef Surgeonfishes , 1986 .

[24]  C. Welden,et al.  The Intensity of Competition Versus its Importance: An Overlooked Distinction and Some Implications , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  B. Victor.  Larval Settlement and Juvenile Mortality in a Recruitment‐Limited Coral Reef Fish Population , 1986 .

[26]  C. Roberts.  Experimental analysis of resource sharing between herbivorous damselfish and blennies on the Great Barrier Reef , 1987 .

[27]  G. Jones.  COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS AMONG ADULTS AND JUVENILES IN A CORAL REEF FISH , 1987 .

[28]  Kristine C. Behrents.  The influence of shelter availability on recruitment and early juvenile survivorship of Lythrypnus dalli Gilbert (Pisces: Gobiidae) , 1987 .

[29]  T. Hughes,et al.  The population dynamics of reef fishes , 1988 .

[30]  G. Jones.  Some interactions between residents and recruits in two coral reef fishes , 1988 .

[31]  B. Mapstone,et al.  Recruitment and the structure of assemblages of fish on coral reefs. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  G. Jones.  Experimental evaluation of the effects of habitat structure and competitive interactions on the juveniles of two coral reef fishes , 1988 .

[33]  H. Sweatman.  Field evidence that settling coral reef fish larvae detect resident fishes using dissolved chemical cues , 1988 .

[34]  P. Doherty,et al.  The replenishment of coral reef fish populations , 1988 .

[35]  P. Fairweather,et al.  Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  G. Jones.  THE IMPORTANCE OF RECRUITMENT TO THE DYNAMICS OF A CORAL REEF FISH POPULATION , 1990 .

[37]  G. Forrester.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE JUVENILE DEMOGRAPHY OF A CORAL REEF FISH , 1990 .

[38]  P. Sale,et al.  Recruitment of marine species: Is the bandwagon rolling in the right direction? , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  S. Holbrook,et al.  Population Responses of Surfperch Released from Competition , 1990 .

[40]  P. Doherty.  Spatial and temporal patterns in recruitment , 1991 .

[41]  P. Sale.  CHAPTER 19 – Reef Fish Communities: Open Nonequilibrial Systems , 1991 .

[42]  M. Hixon,et al.  CHAPTER 17 – Predation as a Process Structuring Coral Reef Fish Communities , 1991 .

[43]  G. Jones.  CHAPTER 11 – Postrecruitment Processes in the Ecology of Coral Reef Fish Populations: A Multifactorial Perspective , 1991 .

[44]  D. Booth.  Larval settlement patterns and preferences by domino damselfish Dascyllus albisella Gill , 1992 .

[45]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Indirect Effects, Prey Susceptibility, and Habitat Selection: Impacts of Birds on Limpets and Algae , 1992 .

[46]  M. Hixon,et al.  Predation, Prey Refuges, and the Structure of Coral‐Reef Fish Assemblages , 1993 .

[47]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Indirect Effects and Habitat Use in an Intertidal Community: Interaction Chains and Interaction Modifications , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[48]  P. Doherty,et al.  An Empirical Test of Recruitment Limitation in a Coral Reef Fish , 1994, Science.

[49]  M. Hixon,et al.  Predation effects on early post-settlement survivorship of coral-reef fishes , 1995 .

[50]  D. Booth.  Juvenile Groups in a Coral‐Reef Damselfish: Density‐Dependent Effects on Individual Fitness and Population Demography , 1995 .

[51]  M. Steele.  Effects of predators on reef fishes: separating cage artifacts from effects of predation , 1996 .