The dramatic extraction construction in French

Relying on spoken corpora (Corpaix, CRFP) and on previous studies (Sabio 1995, 1996), we identify a construction common in spoken French, which we analyze as a particular case of extraction: a. dix sept ans il a. (Seventeen years he has) [Corpaix] b. deux cigarettes j'ai fume. (Two cigarettes I smoked) [on the fly] The construction can only be a root clause and a declarative clause. Its interpretation is that of a thetic proposition. On the other hand, it is not associated with a unique information structure, since it is compatible with a focus-ground partition, with the extracted constotunet as a narrow focus, or with an all focus interpretation. We call this construction 'dramatic extraction', and the extracted element a 'center' (i.e. a focus or a figure). We formalize our analysis in the HPSG grammar.

[1]  Olivier Bonami,et al.  The Syntax of French de-N' Phrases , 2004 .

[2]  J. Milner.  De la syntaxe à l'interprétation : quantités, insultes, exclamations , 1978 .

[3]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates , 1995 .

[4]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  French Clitic Movement Without Clitics or Movement , 1997 .

[5]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Semantics and Conversations for an Agent Communication Language , 1997, IJCAI.

[6]  Jean-Marie Marandin,et al.  From Complex to Simple Speech Acts: a Bidimensional Analysis of Il- locutionary Forces , 2006 .

[7]  Frédéric Sabio,et al.  Choix de textes de français parlé : 36 extraits , 2002 .

[8]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Context in Dynamic Interpretation , 2008 .

[9]  William A. Ladusaw.  Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong , 1994 .

[10]  Danièle Godard,et al.  Reinforcing negation: The case of Italian , 2006, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[11]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[12]  Anne Abeillé,et al.  Two types of NP preposing in French , 2008, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[13]  Daniel Büring,et al.  The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent , 1997 .

[14]  E. Prince.  On the Limits of Syntax, with reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization , 1998 .

[15]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[16]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  How Not to Mark Topics: 'Topicalization' in English and Yiddish , 1999 .

[17]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[18]  Joachim Jacobs,et al.  The dimensions of topiccomment , 2001 .

[19]  Stefan M̈uller,et al.  Complex Topic-Comment Structures in HPSG , 2007 .

[20]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of given-new information , 1981 .

[21]  Danièle Godard,et al.  Aspects pragmatiques de la négation renforcée en italien , 2007 .

[22]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure , 2011 .