A participatory approach to helicopter user interface design

The importance of involving users during user interface (UI) design activities is widely recognised however the nature of this involvement may vary significantly. This study investigated the benefits and challenges of applying Participatory Design (PD) during the development of helicopter UI. During the first phase, four helicopter design professionals were interviewed in order to understand their views on user involvement and current approaches. The second phase involved three helicopter test pilots and three human factors specialists participating in a PD workshop (based on design thinking) focussed on a helicopter UI design case study (the Automatic Flight Control System within a Royal Navy Merlin Mark 2). There was strong agreement from all the participants that user involvement is important and current approaches were described as mainly consultative. Benefits identified included a better understanding of the problem and context of use and therefore closer alignment of the design with user needs. The approach encouraged divergent thinking and benefitted from being multidisciplinary. Minor changes to the workshop format should be considered in order to minimise the risk of bias and make the best use of the participants’ time. This study developed a valuable approach to PD which is likely to be generalizable to other domains.

[1]  Takeo Yoshida On User Participation in Design , 1972 .

[2]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[3]  Gyuchan Thomas Jun,et al.  A participatory systems approach to design for safer integrated medicine management , 2018, Ergonomics.

[4]  Eva Olsson,et al.  What active users and designers contribute in the design process , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[5]  Michael J. Muller Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique , 1992, CHI.

[6]  G. Potter Design Thinking 101 , 2017 .

[7]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models , 2000, Ergonomics.

[8]  Kenneth D. Eason,et al.  User-centred design: for users or by users? , 1995 .

[9]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  The Methodology of Participatory Design , 2005 .

[10]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Alexandra Fort,et al.  Automotive HMI design and participatory user involvement: review and perspectives , 2017, Ergonomics.

[12]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Göran Falkman,et al.  User Participation in the Design of Cockpit Interfaces , 2017 .

[14]  A. Lancaster,et al.  Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[15]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  From user-centered to participatory design approaches , 2002 .

[16]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The 'problem' of automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction , 1990 .

[17]  Michael J. Muller PICTIVE—an exploration in participatory design , 1991, CHI.

[18]  Nigan Bayazit,et al.  An ergonomics based design research method for the arrangement of helicopter flight instrument panels. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Clive Frankish,et al.  User involvement in the early stages of the development of an aircraft warning system , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  D A Norman,et al.  The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..