Emerging Collaboration Routines in Knowledge-Intensive Work Processes: Insights from Three Case Studies

This article aims to identify how knowledge workers develop their own collaboration strategies and techniques for getting their work done in complex, dynamic knowledge intensive work environments. Three case studies have been conducted to explore the nature of routines in different collaborative working settings as they provide sufficient detail to better understand the actual state and problems regarding collaborative work processes among knowledge workers. Evidences from these cases show that coordination and control of projects, tasks, information, and little support by collaboration tools in all work patterns seem to be the biggest issues and there is a need for better understanding of collaboration culture as well as harmonious and integrated redesign of collaboration routines with new collaborative working environment technologies. The analysis of the cases also shows that there are considerable differences in ways of how actors communicate and coordinate their work which leads varying degrees of quality in knowledge intensive work. The results can be used to achieve a smoother collaborative working phase through innovative technical developments.

[1]  Bernhard Katzy,et al.  Coordination routines behind knowledge intensive work processes , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).

[2]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  Simon French,et al.  Web-Based Group Decision Support for Crisis Management , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[4]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  ECOSPACE -- Towards an Integrated Collaboration Space for eProfessionals , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.

[5]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[6]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  Organizing New Product Development Projects in Strategic Alliances , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[7]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[8]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Towards an ecology of inter-organizational routines: a conceptual framework for the analysis of net-enabled organizations , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[9]  Elisabeth Davenport,et al.  Mundane knowledge management and microlevel organizational learning: An ethological approach , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Gordon Sung,et al.  OSS tools to support collaborative mobile work practices , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).

[11]  Bjørn Erik Munkvold Levels of Adoption in Organizational Implementation of E-Collaboration Technologies , 2008 .

[12]  Ned Kock Emerging E-collaboration Concepts and Applications , 2006 .

[13]  Ned Kock,et al.  E-Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications , 2009 .

[14]  J. Reiman Thinking for a Living , 2001 .

[15]  Markus C. Becker Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[17]  J. Jarillo On strategic networks , 1988 .

[18]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  The Influence of Supply Chain Collaboration on Process, Relational and Product Innovations , 2010 .

[19]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation , 2004 .

[20]  P. Drucker Management Challenges for the 21st Century , 1992 .

[21]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[22]  A. Puonti,et al.  Tools for Collaboration: Using and Designing Tools in Interorganizational Economic-Crime Investigation , 2004 .

[23]  Kai Riemer,et al.  E-Collaboration Systems: Identification of System Classes using Cluster Analysis , 2009, Int. J. e Collab..

[24]  G. Walker,et al.  The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[25]  P. Drucker,et al.  The age discontinuity. , 1979, Population bulletin.

[26]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[27]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services , 2002 .

[28]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Group Side Effects in Electronic Brainstorming: More Heads are Better than One , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[30]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[31]  J. H. Dyer Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[32]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[33]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[34]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[35]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Work in the Information Age , 2000, First Monday.

[36]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Leadership Style, Anonymity, and the Discussion of an Ethical Issue in an Electronic Context , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..