Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Patrick L. Taylor,et al. Multidimensional Results Reporting to Participants in Genomic Studies: Getting It Right , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.
[2] K. Offit,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[3] L. Beskow,et al. Prospective Biorepository Participants' Perspectives on Access to Research Results , 2009, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[4] Wendy A. Wolf,et al. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[5] N. Berlinger. The Nature of Chaplaincy and the Goals of QI: Patient-Centered Care as Professional Responsibility , 2008, The Hastings Center report.
[6] Kathy Hudson,et al. Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.
[7] D. Callahan. Organized Obfuscation: Advocacy for Physician-Assisted Suicide , 2008, The Hastings Center report.
[8] Suzanne Christopher,et al. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. , 2008, American journal of public health.
[9] L. Parker. The Future of Incidental Findings: Should They Be Viewed as Benefits? , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
[10] Frances P Lawrenz,et al. Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
[11] S. Joffe,et al. Bench to Bedside: Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research , 2008, The Hastings Center report.
[12] S. Offe. Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research , 2008 .
[13] H. Greely. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. , 2007, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.
[14] B. Wilfond,et al. Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[15] M. Rothstein. Tiered Disclosure Options Promote the Autonomy and Well-Being of Research Subjects , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[16] L. Parker. Best Laid Plans for Offering Results Go Awry , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[17] P. Ossorio. Letting the Gene Out of the Bottle: A Comment on Returning Individual Research Results to Participants , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.
[18] Gail P Jarvik,et al. Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[19] L. Henry. Undesirable Implications of Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants , 2006 .
[20] H. Richardson,et al. Medical researchers' ancillary clinical care responsibilities , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[21] H. Richardson,et al. The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects. , 2004, The Hastings Center report.
[22] Donna B. Stoddard,et al. Getting IT right. , 2004, Harvard business review.
[23] E. Emanuel,et al. The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.
[24] P. Smith. The Duty to Rescue and the Slippery Slope Problem , 1990 .