Can a Negative Selection Detect an Extremely few Non-self among Enormous Amount of Self Cells?

We have had lots of reports in which they asserted a negative selection algorithm successfully distinguished non-self cells from self cells, especially in a context of “network intrusion detection” where self patterns are assumed to represent normal transactions while non-self patterns represent anomaly. Furthermore they went on to assert a negative selection gives us an advantage that we use only a set of self cells as training samples. This would be really an advantage since we usually don’t know what do anomaly patterns look like until they complete an intrusion when it’s too late. We, however, suspect, more or less, its applicability to a real system. This paper gives it a consideration to one of the latest such approaches.

[1]  Heitor Silvério Lopes,et al.  AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO SIMULATE COGNITIVE FEEDBACK LEARNING IN MEDICAL DOMAIN , 1997 .

[2]  Zhou Ji,et al.  Augmented negative selection algorithm with variable-coverage detectors , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753).

[3]  Akira Imada Can a Fuzzy Rule Extraction Find an Extremely Tiny non-Self Region? , 2005, ANNIIP.

[4]  A. Imada Can an Immuno-fuzzy Approach Detect Only a Few Non-self Cells Existed in an Enormous Amount of Self Cells? , 2005, 2005 IEEE Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications.

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  How Learning Can Guide Evolution , 1996, Complex Syst..

[6]  Akira Imada Can a Fuzzy Rule Look for a Needle in a Haystack? , 2005, TAINN.