Electrotactile perception of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen

A comparison of auditory and visual perception of scatterplots showed similar correlation estimation performance in both modalities. The present study replicated this experiment using electrotactile (electrocutaneous) presentation of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen, as well as visual presentation. The correlation estimation task resulted in a slightly poorer performance on electrotactile scatterplots (abdomen r=+0.847; fingertip r=+0.723) compared with the previous Flowers auditory displays (r=+0.91). There were similar levels of performance in the visual (control) condition in both the studies (r for both approx.+0.91). The performance in the correlation estimation task was similar across the two electrotactile displays, with perhaps a slight, but not significant (p=0.077), advantage for the abdominal array. However, a preliminary digit identification task on both displays produced a better performance on the fingertip display (p<0.05), suggesting that the relative performance of the two displays may be task specific. The present results demonstrate electrotactile perception of complex graphs and provide useful information for improving future versions of tactile displays.

[1]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Tactile displays , 1995 .

[2]  John H. Flowers,et al.  Cross-Modal Equivalence of Visual and Auditory Scatterplots for Exploring Bivariate Data Samples , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[3]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Hairy skin: psychophysical channels and their physiological substrates. , 1994, Somatosensory & motor research.

[4]  H. Schwan,et al.  Biological Engineering , 1970 .

[5]  K.A. Kaczmarek,et al.  Pattern identification as a function of stimulation on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  K. Kaczmarek,et al.  Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Frank A. Saunders,et al.  Electrocutaneous Stimulation for Sensory Communication in Rehabilitation Engineering , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Development of Tactile Mice for Blind Access to Computers: Importance of Stimulation Locus, Object Size, and Vibrotactile Display Resolution , 1991 .

[9]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Pattern identification on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display , 1997, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 'Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering' (Cat. No.97CH36136).

[10]  T. Yoshioka,et al.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  R W Cholewiak,et al.  Individual differences in the vibrotactile perception of a “simple” pattern set , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Similarity of Tactual and Visual Picture Recognition with Limited Field of View , 1991, Perception.

[13]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Frances Aldrich,et al.  Tactile graphics in school education: perspectives from pupils , 2001 .

[15]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J M Loomis,et al.  A model of character recognition and legibility. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  S Grimnes.  Electrovibration, cutaneous sensation of microampere current. , 1983, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  S Weinstein,et al.  Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality , 1968 .

[19]  John H. Flowers,et al.  Musical versus Visual Graphs: Cross-Modal Equivalence in Perception of Time Series Data , 1995, Hum. Factors.